What's new
By:

Reputation Comments, positive and negative

Stickler said:
Your accusations were multiple. Your suspicions were ridiculous and stupid (go figger, eh?). When you smear somebody based on nothing but the fact that you've got a burr under your saddle about that person, and then it comes out that you were wrong, and your smears had no basis in fact, apologizing seems like the least thing. Not you, though. You wouldn't man up like that. No sir, eh?
Click to expand...

+ infinity.
 
Hopper said:
I don't want to git another infraction, Colton. Are you seriously asking me for an answer? I mentioned the reason to you before, but you indicated that you didn't want to hear it or consider it.

Part, but only part, of the reason I don't think it's too clear has been discussed in this thread: https://jazzfanz.com/showthread.php...threads-and-posts-are-intended-to-be-so-bland...
Click to expand...

I read through that thread, and still do not follow your inability to understand trolling. Unless you yourself are trolling by pretending to not understand it... which frankly seems the most likely thing to me (as I've mentioned before).

But, if our description of trolling still confuses you, please feel free to use this description instead:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

Maybe the additional details presented there will help.

I will also mention this: I have received infractions for the very things which you (as I understood you) said would NOT be an infraction, based on the "trolling" definition.
Click to expand...

I suspect you misunderstood me then, but frankly I'm not sure which specific thing you are referring to.
 
What a hack fest this is. Our mods are so bored that they have to have a meeting to discuss whether to infract Sloanfailed and I for giving one false rep? How is that trolling? Do you know what trolling is? It's an anonymous rep system. If you are going to make it all public anyway you might as well have Jason go into vBulletin and code it to be a public rep system.

How about giving Beantown some infractions for trolling? rainhut? ncoloradojazz? Come on.
 
Marty McFly said:
What a hack fest this is. Our mods are so bored that they have to have a meeting to discuss whether to infract Sloanfailed and I for giving one false rep? How is that trolling? Do you know what trolling is? It's an anonymous rep system. If you are going to make it all public anyway you might as well have Jason go into vBulletin and code it to be a public rep system.

How about giving Beantown some infractions for trolling? rainhut? ncoloradojazz? Come on.
Click to expand...

Backseat moderating?
 
Marty McFly said:
It's an anonymous rep system.
Click to expand...

From post #31 of this thread:
colton said:
By the way folks, anonymous reputation comments are NOT truly anonymous. That is, Jason and myself can look up who made what comment to whom and potentially even give you warnings/infractions if your comments cross a line.
Click to expand...

Marty McFly said:
How about giving Beantown some infractions for trolling? rainhut? ncoloradojazz? Come on.
Click to expand...

How do you know they haven't? I didn't check just now, but I'm fairly certain that those first two individuals, at least, have received recent infractions.
 
Just a question, but why is Beantown the target of sooooo many people here? All I get is that they disagree w/his views on marriage and evolution. Is it really that bad to share different views on a message board?

Anyone remember the Bark to the Future cartoon?
 
Found it! Ohhh how this brings me back. I believe there was a Indiana Jones cartoon and a MC hammer cartoon back in the day.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SNhxGQa98E

It's too bad that they couldn't get the News's version of this song.
 
The Thriller said:
Just a question, but why is Beantown the target of sooooo many people here? All I get is that they disagree w/his views on marriage and evolution. Is it really that bad to share different views on a message board?

Anyone remember the Bark to the Future cartoon?
Click to expand...

How many times do we have to go over this? Different views are fine. Lots of people on here have them. It's not OK to target people and purposely offend them whether they be gay, transsexual, etc. The only exception is if they're a moran. Like Beantown.
 
Marty McFly said:
How many times do we have to go over this? Different views are fine. Lots of people on here have them. It's not OK to target people and purposely offend them whether they be gay, transsexual, etc. The only exception is if they're a moran. Like Beantown.
Click to expand...

Ok fair enough.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top