What's new

RIP Phillip Seymour Hoffman

ok. what is worong for opposing feeling sad and goin al R.I.P. for some mentally weak dude who essentially killed himself?

seriously whats wrong with that.


dont tell me addiction is a disease. ooh yeah if it is its a disease of being weakminded

Ahem.

https://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/addiction/genes/

I believe the entire genetics department of the University of Utah would like to have a word with you. Along with half the staff in the detox unit.
 
ok. what is worong for opposing feeling sad and goin al R.I.P. for some mentally weak dude who essentially killed himself?

seriously whats wrong with that.

Besides that you're actually, provably wrong and that you are an ******* (saying nothing of your being a trash tornado)? Nothing I guess.
 
Dude. Of all the places you could have linked... The U?



*Credibility, flushed*

I'd like to introduce you to Mario Capecchi

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Capecchi

Again, NOBEL PRIZE WINNING, Mario Capecchi. Nobel prize in 2007 for Physiology or Medicine.. his field of Physiology or Medicine?

Genetics.

Stick that in your credibility pipe and pretend to smoke it you "I wanna be cool but can't", "Mamma's Boys Nephite shirt" wearin, root beer drinking girly man.

I'm surprised they didn't disqualify you from your grappling match for hitting with your purse.
 
like scientific researchers have never been wrong.

You're right. Guess we're gonna have to take the opinion of some bigoted, sexually-conflicted juice head from the Netherlands on the genetic-ramifications on drugs & physiology, instead of an entire body of researchers who have no beneficiary motive to make statements like "genes are implicated in drug addiction".
 
I'd like to introduce you to Mario Capecchi

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Capecchi

Again, NOBEL PRIZE WINNING, Mario Capecchi. Nobel prize in 2007 for Physiology or Medicine.. his field of Physiology or Medicine?

Genetics.

Stick that in your credibility pipe and pretend to smoke it you "I wanna be cool but can't", "Mamma's Boys Nephite shirt" wearin, root beer drinking girly man.

I'm surprised they didn't disqualify you from your grappling match for hitting with your purse.

Dude, I HATE root beer.
 
I get the argument that free will should ultimately trump all other factors. But the idea that because someone made a mistake - even/especially if they know it's a mistake - that costs them their own life, that isn't sad or that their legacy can be summed up by saying "sum dum junkie" is a pretty awful one. At the very least.

From everything I've been able to gather, PSH had been largely clean for the past 20 years and succumbed to relapses from time to time. Considering that, and his noteworthy and overwhelmingly positive contributions to the arts and culture of the world, let's have a little respect.
 
I'd like to introduce you to Mario Capecchi

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Capecchi

Again, NOBEL PRIZE WINNING, Mario Capecchi. Nobel prize in 2007 for Physiology or Medicine.. his field of Physiology or Medicine?

Genetics.

Stick that in your credibility pipe and pretend to smoke it you "I wanna be cool but can't", "Mamma's Boys Nephite shirt" wearin, root beer drinking girly man.

I'm surprised they didn't disqualify you from your grappling match for hitting with your purse.

Obama was a nobel prize winner.
so was arafat nobel price winner do not speak absolute truth
 
Obama was a nobel prize winner.
so was arafat nobel price winner do not speak absolute truth

Did Mario Capecchi win a Nobel peace prize? Can you propose any sort of criteria to devalue Nobel Prizes in Physics, Medicine, or any of the Natural Sciences?
 
I get the argument that free will should ultimately trump all other factors. But the idea that because someone made a mistake - even/especially if they know it's a mistake - that costs them their own life, that isn't sad or that their legacy can be summed up by saying "sum dum junkie" is a pretty awful one. At the very least.

From everything I've been able to gather, PSH had been largely clean for the past 20 years and succumbed to relapses from time to time. Considering that, and his noteworthy and overwhelmingly positive contributions to the arts and culture of the world, let's have a little respect.

cant dney he made some great movies. i can enjoy those movies.

i'm not like the bigotted LBGT BLGT or whatever they call themself.
they boycot enders game because of the guy who worte the books was opposed to homosexuality yada yada.
he basically was cut from movies for marketing reasons.

i still enjoy "his" movies(i say his cause he does not own them and 1 man does ussually not make or break a movie).

BUT DONT SEE THE NEED TO PITY THAT FOOL. there are a whole lot of worse things in the world than feel sad/sorry for some junkie, who is a victim of his own doing.
i'll save my sadness and pity for others who are not a victim of their own doing but some other aholes doing.
 
scientist have been proven wrong over history :P.s
scientist speak no absolute truth

So your answer is no then, predictably.


Still, that's not as embarrassing as a Jewish person pushing forth Eugenic principles. Your ancestors would be disgraced if they read your posts in this thread. I don't feel sorry for them, however-- I feel sorry for you.


And with that, I have no care to carry this conversation onward.
 
So your answer is no then, predictably.


Still, that's not as embarrassing as a Jewish person pushing forth Eugenic principles. Your ancestors would be disgraced if they read your posts in this thread. I don't feel sorry for them, however-- I feel sorry for you.


And with that, I have no care to carry this conversation onward.
wtf are yout alking about do i say go out and kill al junkies put them in a work camp.

i just say junkies are weakminded and desevrve no pity if they die of overdose.
 
wtf are yout alking about do i say go out and kill al junkies put them in a work camp.

i just say junkies are weakminded and desevrve no pity if they die of overdose.

Your entire argument is based on "Scientists have been wrong before"

And they could be wrong. But there's a much better chance they're right than you are.

Go ahead and be happy betting on that mule to win the Kentucky Derby.. .the odds line is remarkable. 1:1,000,000,000,000,000. all you gotta do is bet that $1 and you're the richest person on the planet when it finishes first.
 
Back
Top