cctrackstar
Well-Known Member
This:Send his *** to the D-league haha
This:Send his *** to the D-league haha
Why didn't we amnesty him? Wait, is it still possible?
How would amnesty have hurt Bell? I thought the advantages of amnesty were that his salary wouldn't count against the cap and that if another team signed him that would reduce the amount we have to pay him.If we let our window to amnesty Raja pass so he could shop for a team of his choice, that was our leverage. Terms should have been set for that privilege, and Raja should have been accepting financial risk to avoid amnesty.
there is actually zero suspense on this, guys. bell and the jazz have mutually decided there's no future to that marriage. when the exact transaction takes place and for how much money are fairly unimportant details.
he won't be in camp, he won't be on the roster when games start. that's all that really matters, whether they sign the papers tomorrow on october 30.
Exactly. I'm sure the Jazz were avoiding amnesty so they could get a small trade exception for him. Now they have to probably buy him out for the full amount. If I were Raja, I'd hold out too. With no interest by other teams, you want the Jazz to pay you your full salary. It's like getting suspended with full pay.there is actually zero suspense on this, guys. bell and the jazz have mutually decided there's no future to that marriage. when the exact transaction takes place and for how much money are fairly unimportant details.
he won't be in camp, he won't be on the roster when games start. that's all that really matters, whether they sign the papers tomorrow on october 30.