Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
I clearly wrote this in my first post in this thread. Clearly.No.
My “I’ll be damned” post was just because I finally understood what you were trying to say btw.
I clearly wrote this in my first post in this thread. Clearly.No.
My “I’ll be damned” post was just because I finally understood what you were trying to say btw.
Finally someone else gets it. I was beginning to think I had entered some alternate universe where nobody could see what was right in front of their eyes. This post is pretty much spot on.Before anyone bites my head off, hear me out...
I used to be the biggest Gobert fan. Great defensive presence, passion, etc. Now that he was injured for a couple games and back, you can really see how much better the jazz play without him on the floor.
While he was injured the jazz were scoring in triple digits every night and blowing teams away by 15+ points, since he has been back we've been losing.
It's so clear to see. When he's in the game, the jazz struggle offesnively, he's so big that he clogs the middle. when he has the ball he has no finess and zero fundamental skills for a big man. without him the offense seems fluid, efficient, fast, fun to watch. with him in the game slows down, these days the nba doesn't use big man like when we had malone and mark eaton.
i really also saw favors shine at center while gobert was out. what do you all think? i know we could have beat the past 3 teams if gobert was out, i know it.
thanks fellow jazz brothers and sisters. Go Jazz
From my first post, please, tell me what was so confusing or what you didn't get or what you had a problem with.Lol at archie
From my first post, please, tell me what was so confusing or what you didn't get or what you had a problem with.
Thank you. Not going to lose sleep over a dude that gets confused, but can spell it out, but is still confused and type lol @.You first post talks about cards and stuff.... talks about how people should respond to the op..... talks about how you would rather keep gobert than favors..... talks about how the jazz are better without gobert on the court with favors in his place.
Then you have a more posts throughout the thread about trading gobert. And other posts that kinda confuse what your original point was which seems to be that the jazz are better without gobert and he should be traded but that you would rather keep gobert.
Anywho, this isn't why I come to this site (wastes to much of my time. I would rather be reading my book before bed than having this stupid convo with you) so I think I will just put you on ignore at this point.
Before anyone bites my head off, hear me out...
I used to be the biggest Gobert fan. Great defensive presence, passion, etc. Now that he was injured for a couple games and back, you can really see how much better the jazz play without him on the floor.
While he was injured the jazz were scoring in triple digits every night and blowing teams away by 15+ points, since he has been back we've been losing.
It's so clear to see. When he's in the game, the jazz struggle offesnively, he's so big that he clogs the middle. when he has the ball he has no finess and zero fundamental skills for a big man. without him the offense seems fluid, efficient, fast, fun to watch. with him in the game slows down, these days the nba doesn't use big man like when we had malone and mark eaton.
i really also saw favors shine at center while gobert was out. what do you all think? i know we could have beat the past 3 teams if gobert was out, i know it.
thanks fellow jazz brothers and sisters. Go Jazz
Finally someone else gets it. I was beginning to think I had entered some alternate universe where nobody could see what was right in front of their eyes. This post is pretty much spot on.
Prepare to have a bunch of insecure idiots pile on the insults as they froth at the mouth at anyone having the gall to say a bad word about their beloved Gobert.
Hehepeepeecaca or retard?Don’t you think that is a really outdated derogatory term? I’m generically challenged.
I thought they did away with 82games.comStats +/- (82 games.com) :
Rubio-Favors-Gobert : 203 min ; rating : -69 disastrous
Rubio-Favors : 163 min ; rating : -33 bad
Rubio-Gobert : 68 min ; rating : +34 very good
Favors-Gobert : 21 min ; rating : +6 average
Only Rubio : 21 min ; rating : +25 excellent
Only Favors : 78 min ; rating : +15 average
Only Gobert : 13 min ; rating : +4 average
Sans Rubio/Favors/Gobert : 49 min ; rating : +45 excellent