Wow, I agree. Good point.I think the good games are more translatable for success than the bad has for failure at this stage.
The Spurs have 3 great players to build a system around. The Jazz really just have 1 unless Jefferson is having a really solid night. If the Jazz could get another player as dynamic and consistent as Ginobli, we'd be in business.
Brook Lopez sucks.I don't see why people feel they need to eat crow. Hayward has played a few good games, but that's it. Is that consistent enough for you guys? honz, you're pretty quick to call people out and say how right you are, but in reality, how right are you about Hayward?
You mean he's played like a rookie?As much as I hated the pick, I feel I've kept my arguments based on the here-and-now and tried to stay away from crying over spilled milk and then making proclamations to validate that. I feel it's too early to call scrub or savior on the kid, but he has played some incredibly, terribly bad basketball and some very nice, good games as well. I think the good games are more translatable for success than the bad has for failure at this stage.
All that may be true, but Sanders is a 4, we are stacked with players who can play the 4 on this team. Hayward fills a need and is much better than you give him credit for. Hayward's best case senario as far as his career goes is a starter who is considered a borderline All-Star and the ultimate role-player, which is exactly what we need.
Damn, seems I was pretty close with that call. Looks like Hayward may even exceed that though.
Pretty fun thread read if you like seeing ncolorado being ridiculously wrong.