What's new

Serious quesiton for people who deny human involvement in climate change/global warming

Or we can just work together to solve big problems instead of worrying that every collective action is the equivalent of giving Hitler a *******.

well, aside from Hitler's life in the south woods of Argentina, and such, I think Hitler is pretty much out of the picture.

Lord Cecil Rhodes is also gone.

However, we still have Prince Philip and the Queen, and Maurice Strong, a bunch of banking families and the military industrial corporates, and oh, say, some pharmaceutical and oil cartels, and, well, . . . . I could go one. . . . folks who can inordinately weigh in with a plan for our future. Is it too much to admit that the real meaning of "fascism" from it's Latin roots correlates very well with "influence peddling", and private "connections" with real influence in our politics?

I think government is probably always susceptible to such influences, but we do need to at least make the effort to make it honest, and to hold up actual truth in "science" in a context of objectivity.
 
I have a question for those who don't think man's activities are NOT a contributing factor to climate change?

Where did you stand on the Terri Schiavo case?

Disclaimer: Not trolling.
 
I have a question for those who don't think man's activities are NOT a contributing factor to climate change?

Where did you stand on the Terri Schiavo case?

Disclaimer: Not trolling.

Has there been anyone say they believe our activities have no impact on the environ/climate?

I for one believe we do have an impact. I just also believe it's smaller than those that, for a living/make money from ringing the bell, try to lead us to believe.

It's also nauseating some of our policies.

We can't use coal because it's dirty, but we can mine for it and send it to India so they can burn it into our SAME atmosphere... and in order to get it there we will put onto trucks, trains, and cargo ships burning diesel??
 
Back
Top