What's new

SL Trib Sez:

Player of the year means nothing in the NBA. Trey Burke was player of the year. Kaminsky absolutely has red flags. 4th year seniors who don't make an impression their 1st 2 years of college rarely have the raw talent to compete at an NBA level. He is not a stretch 4, He's a 5. Maybe he can play limited minutes at the 4 only because Gobert is so damn good at covering for other people. But Kaminsky guarding any 4 that can shoot past 15 feet is going to be a disaster. I realize we aren't getting a star at #12. And I'd probably be happy with Kaminsky at that spot. But he does have about the biggest bust potential of any of the top 15 or so players in the draft. This guy has big awkward stiff written all over him.

That's basically right, but there's also counter examples that are starting caliber (Draymond Green) and rotational talent (Jae Crowder.) There's various analytic formulas that are used to attempt to translate how talent will project in the NBA through WARP - I'll confess I don't totally understand how they work, but in Pelton's latest analysis, Kaminsky's WARP projects out really well, and just below Okafor. In Pelton's words:

While age has historically been an important factor in draft prospects' potential, consider Kaminsky exhibit A that seniors can rate well, too. His 2.7 WARP projection is the best for a senior since Draymond Green (2.8)

Here's Chad Ford on Kaminsky:

Frank Kaminsky is not just a big man who can shoot. He's a flat out shooter.


"I hear 'guys your size,' and that doesn't mean anything to me," Kaminsky told me after the workout. "I just play one way. I count on myself to make every shot. ... It's competition within myself to make everything. It's always been that way."

Kaminsky shot the lights out in his one-on-none workout. That shouldn't come as a huge surprise to those who followed him the past two years at Wisconsin. Kaminsky shot 42 percent from 3-point range this season as a senior and 38 percent as a junior. Still, his shooting prowess caught some NBA general managers off guard.

"I knew he could shoot it," one GM told ESPN.com. "But not like that."

Kaminsky said he's always been a great shooter. As a high school freshman, he stood just 6-foot-2 and was a wing. He grew to 6-foot-6 as a sophomore. He didn't hit big-man status until his junior year, when he reached 6-foot-9. By then his coach knew what Kaminsky could do from outside and created an offense that allowed him to roam the perimeter.

EDITOR'S PICKS

Ford: Who's in, who's out of 2015 NBA draft?
The latest on which players are entering the 2015 NBA draft and which are staying put.
People talk about D'Angelo Russell and Devin Booker as the best shooters in the draft. But Kaminsky is right there with them -- if not past them. It just so happens that he stands 7-feet tall.

Kaminsky flirted with entering the draft after his junior season. NBA scouts predicted he'd be a late first-rounder. But Kaminsky said he wasn't quite ready for the NBA.

"I knew I needed to get better. I wanted to go back to school, finish my degree and do more research by watching NBA basketball so I could see what I needed to get better at," he said. "It was like a free year to study for your final exam."

It paid off. Kaminsky was the college basketball Player of the Year. By virtually all accounts, Kaminsky will be lottery pick this year.

But why isn't he higher? He's a 7-footer who can stroke the 3 and play in the paint. He's had two incredible seasons at Wisconsin. Is it a little crazy that teams hold it against him that he's a senior? The NBA is one of the few careers in the world in which a 22 year old is considered old.

Kamisnky said he's frustrated by the age slight but that he understands. This season he played head-to-head against the two guys -- Karl-Anthony Towns and Jahlil Okafor -- who will likely go No. 1 and No. 2 in the draft. He averaged 21 PPG and 11.RPG in those two contests. Yet 10-plus spots in the draft separate him from them.

"I see the top-three picks, with the way drafts have gone in the past, as players with potential to be really good players for longer than potentially myself," Kaminsky said, before acknowledging that Towns and Okafor were better at 19 than he was. "If I had tried to go to the NBA after my freshman year, people would've laughed at me. Just where they are, their potential, if they went back to college for three more years, they'd probably have better seasons than I did this year."

Still, Kaminsky thinks he has a place in the NBA today. And he's not trying to be a back-to-the basket center like Okafor or Towns. He wants to be the next Dirk Nowitzki. "I'm going to try," Kaminsky said. "I see myself playing the 4. At least initially in my career, while I'm moving as well as possible. I feel like I'm shooting the ball well and moving well and I think that stuff translates just the way the NBA goes with pick-and-rolls, pick-and-pops, pick-and-fades ... there's a lot of room to operate. It's the trend and it's lucky for me that I play that way."
 
if he had his offensive skill set and was also a great defender he'd be picked ahead of Okafor.

This is the point people really ought to put some thought into. Utah really, really could benefit from having a stretch big to give us another dimension to our offense. However, finding a guy like that who is also a great defender isn't going to be easy. That type of player doesn't grow on trees. Obviously most of us have a bunch of players we'd rather have, but realistically, who has a bigger impact on the dynamic of our offense, a guy like Frank, or someone like Booker who could be a really nice pick up, but kinda duplicates what we are already getting from Hood? I guess if you really believe Frank will be a terrible defender, I could understand the apprehension, but with Frank playing next to Favors or better, next to Rudy, I don't think it's too far fetched that he could defend adequately enough to make it worth drafting him at 12.
 
I just have a hard time seeing how he'll be worse than olynyk. Kelly isn't great but he's a good 3rd big. If you can get a good rotation player on a cheap contract it is a huge boost to the team.
 
Normally I'd be against going for the big white stiff, but Frank Kaminsky is really intriguing. Especially since he's a perfect fit for us.

I'd still like to see an aggressive move up if the FO can identify a future star.
 
I have said it for months, Frank Kaminsky will not be there if we pick at #12. He will be going in the top 10.
 
I just have a hard time seeing how he'll be worse than olynyk. Kelly isn't great but he's a good 3rd big. If you can get a good rotation player on a cheap contract it is a huge boost to the team.

This is a great point on an important intangible of signing Kaminsky -- that he is NBA ready and gives you more financial flexibility and cap space for 4 years. Easier to fill in guard/wing slots at the end of the bench for cheap than to get quality backup bigs on the cheap.
 
I'm on board for Kaminsky of he's there. I'd like to fill out the roster with guys who can shoot. Is Doug McDermott available?
 
Top