What's new

The Biden Administration and All Things Politics



The movie is fiction, based on real events but not reflecting those events in great detail. I have not seen it, so I won't pretend accurate knowledge of its contents.
Didn't think so. There is nothing Qanon in it like I said yet you and Gameface had to go there and push your own ******* crazy Qanon lies for what reason? Why even chime in and stick up for something when you have no proof. This is not a random thing to lie about... This is about child rape...My proof? Is Gamefaces link that literally even says it's not there. You have to push a literal lie as always. There is nothing Qanon in the movie like claimed by left wing media(CNN has a strong history of pedophilia, hell your president sniffs underage girls) and Democrats who are trying to demonize a movie based on true story movie about child rape... Nothing... You know this. Why you had to lie is literally mind boggling. I understand GF, but not you.
 
Last edited:
Didn't think so. There is nothing Qanon in it like I said
Nor did I claim otherwise. I said, and you quoted, "The movie is being called a QAnon film because the lead actor repeats the same conspiracy theories as QAnon."

... push your own ******* crazy Qanon lies for what reason?
I offered direct reporting of my claim.

There is nothing Qanon in the movie
That doesn't make the movie accurate or reflective of actual child sex rings.
 
Nor did I claim otherwise. I said, and you quoted, "The movie is being called a QAnon film because the lead actor repeats the same conspiracy theories as QAnon."


I offered direct reporting of my claim.


That doesn't make the movie accurate or reflective of actual child sex rings.
Ok what parts are inaccurate? Be specific. It's literally based off of a true story. Now is the entire thing going be be 100% true? No if course not but you make a claim... Now for once fish, red, thriller Gameface above.. any of you back up your lies. It's exhausting seeing you guys create conspiracies out of thin air then finagle your way out of not backing up your claims.

I bet you won't actually provide anything. You Democrats are taking a movie based off of a true story and calling it Qanon. Then I ask what parts are Qanon and you can't answer. Why? Because Democrats are terrified of this movie. Why? I don't know. Why this movie triggers them is scary but not surprising.

Ps... The movie is pretty damn accurate. Sure it's over dramatized(it's a movie )but the vast majority is based off of true events and you are trying to diminish it by lying that it's inaccurate. Crazy that without even knowing anything about it you would lie that it's inaccurate. How could you possibly even know this? Because your media propagated you knowing you will believe anything without actually looking into it. ..... Just like everything... You and Gameface are proving my point that Democrats are lying about this movie to hide Democrats intentions. Why? I dunno... Why Democrats would try to **** on a true movie showing the atrocities of child sex trafficking is nuts. But you guys also ignore that Biden knowingly and willingly is keeping the borders open and tens of thousands of kids are unaccounted for. Like I said two posters even joked about it strangely


Why can none of you EVER give full answers like me? I'm considered the troll though yet the guys calling me mentally ill that offer nothing but passive aggressive bullying are the smart ones.

You did not put direct reporting you changed the subject completely. You're trying to get away from the actual topic of Democrats lying about the movie. Then you lied about the movie being inaccurate.
 
Last edited:
Ok what parts are inaccurate? Be specific. It's literally based off of a true story.
It's not a biography, documentary, or news report. I.Q. was based off the life of Albert Einstein, nuff said.

No if course not but you make a claim...
I made a claim that I had no reason to expect truth in the film. It's got a QAnon-spouting producer and a QAnon-spouting lead actor, and that is sufficient reason for me, and many others, to doubt its veracity. YMMV.
 
It's not a biography, documentary, or news report. I.Q. was based off the life of Albert Einstein, nuff said.


I made a claim that I had no reason to expect truth in the film. It's got a QAnon-spouting producer and a QAnon-spouting lead actor, and that is sufficient reason for me, and many others, to doubt its veracity. YMMV.
Can you ever answer a question? No you can't. You claim a movie is inaccurate yet can say what parts.

You are exactly what I mean. You literally are proving my point despite me providing actual factual quotes from the main character that it is accurate. Everything I have said is true. Everything you have said is a lie. I have the actual person it's made after saying it's factual. You have nothing. Literally nothing.

Thats extremely f* up. Again my op is 100% spot on. Democrats are taking a true story about child trafficking and lying. You are protecting something insanely evil.
 
Last edited:
Can you ever answer a question? No you can't. You claim a movie is inaccurate yet can say what parts.
I didn't say it was inaccurate, I said I doubted it is accurate. I made a claim about me.

By contrast, you made the claim "The movie is pretty damn accurate." Where is your evidence?

You literally are proving my point despite me providing actual factual quotes from the main character that it is accurate.
The character in the movie says it accurate? Or, did you mean the QAnon-spouting producer and a QAnon-spouting lead actor? I'll need better evidence that that.

I have the actual person it's made after saying it's factual.
That would be the QAnon-spouting producer. I'll need a more reliable source. You do you.
 
I didn't say it was inaccurate, I said I doubted it is accurate. I made a claim about me.

By contrast, you made the claim "The movie is pretty damn accurate." Where is your evidence?


The character in the movie says it accurate? Or, did you mean the QAnon-spouting producer and a QAnon-spouting lead actor? I'll need better evidence that that.


That would be the QAnon-spouting producer. I'll need a more reliable source. You do you.
No Thriller Jr... That would be Tim Ballard in the unbiased links I posted that you should've read if you weren't so busy sniffing your own farts on your intellectual high horse creating blatant lies. This is his accounts about the accuracy of the movie. If you would stop making **** up and just listen to me for once you'd see I already addressed this.

I'm curious how you are pathologically lie on this one and fabricate falsehoods but that's what liars do. Convince themselves through any means. You are really good at that. One of the more polished I've ever conversated with.


Now I've provided his own testimony pointing out it's accuracies in most areas now you provide your evidence that Tim Ballard is lying. Let's see you evidence outside of a rally 2 years ago that has nothing to do with it. What parts are Qanon, liar?


Tim Ballard even chose the actor.......

More unbiased reporting.



View: https://youtu.be/n1kPrJew2RY
 
Last edited:
I didn't say it was inaccurate, I said I doubted it is accurate. I made a claim about me.

By contrast, you made the claim "The movie is pretty damn accurate." Where is your evidence?


The character in the movie says it accurate? Or, did you mean the QAnon-spouting producer and a QAnon-spouting lead actor? I'll need better evidence that that.


That would be the QAnon-spouting producer. I'll need a more reliable source. You do you.
I happened to read this article just the other day:

 

I laugh at the thought you consider Ballard himself and Angel Studios "unbiased sources".
So what's parts are fake? Your alt-left article uses the term Qanon like you cant even name what parts. It's not a difficult question.

Now instead of attacking the movie. You have completely attacked the person. All because you googled something. You had no clue 5 minutes ago or you would've brought this up.

Wow the hate towards lds in your bigoted link says a lot about you. How awful.
 
Last edited:
I happened to read this article just the other day:

Welp... I'm done. Now the board Marxist proves my point for me... Your...own... article.......***Edit as I can admit when I'm wrong... This was a from a linked Slate article I unknowingly hit switching phone windows but same source... Not that it changes anything as it still prove me right and you 3 wrong but I pride myself on being honest and owning mistakes unlike some***



And...I...quote..................

"Although the movie makes no reference to QAnon or its associated conspiracy theories,"

Great stuff guys. You and Gameface literally provided links for me proving my point, thanks! Like literally saying exactly what I was saying. I got a tee time at 7:10. Great flex bro.

 
Last edited:
so do you blue maga folks suggest that Luft get the death penalty for the same failing to register charge that hunter dodged?
 
Republican Party is a laughing stock….



View: https://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/-failure-raskin-on-missing-gop-informant-turning-out-to-be-fugitive-187630661543

Lol. Its predictable at this point.

We have a whistleblower who has all the dirt on the bidens! Is he a trustworthy source? No he is a criminal fugitive but dont worry about that, he is extremely trustworthy in this particular partisan instance.
 
Lol. Its predictable at this point.

We have a whistleblower who has all the dirt on the bidens! Is he a trustworthy source? No he is a criminal fugitive but dont worry about that, he is extremely trustworthy in this particular partisan instance.
So predictable! Who would have thought we’d see the democrats want to hunt down this dangerous “free speaker” and weaponize the fbi against him to shut him up. We’ve not seen that before with MLK Jr, Malcom X, Julian Assange, Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowden, and on and on.

All of us around here know the only reliable source of “true” information is only directly from the Bidens.
 
Who would have thought we’d see the democrats want to hunt down this dangerous “free speaker” and weaponize the fbi against him to shut him up.
Any evidence? Ya, I didn't think so.
You are a really good parrot crossed with a sheep though, so congrats.
 
Any evidence? Ya, I didn't think so.
You are a really good parrot crossed with a sheep though, so congrats.
FIoSBuTXMAQjwIP.jpg
 
So predictable! Who would have thought we’d see the democrats want to hunt down this dangerous “free speaker” and weaponize the fbi against him to shut him up. We’ve not seen that before with MLK Jr, Malcom X, Julian Assange, Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowden, and on and on.
All of those individuals were (wrongly) perceived as threats to the state. Luft is not, and he was charged before he tried to tried to take advantage of Comer.
 
Back
Top