I agree that social cohesion is a serious issue but I don't see a lot of evidence that global leaders, or at least our President is terrified of it. On the contrary, Joe Biden seems to be deliberately ripping the nation into pieces to play one off the other. There was a poll out recently from Quinnipiac that showed 76% of Americans believed political instability was the biggest threat our nation faced. A plurality of respondents in that poll said they believed Biden is doing more to divide the country.
"A fear of the enemy within, not a foreign threat, punctuates a grim assessment by Americans of a democracy in peril and a future of deepening political divisions," said Quinnipiac University Polling Analyst Tim Malloy.
poll.qu.edu
Immediately after this poll was released showing that a plurality of Americans believed Joe Biden was dividing the country, Joe seemed to feel the need to prove all those people correct. His very next public speech told Americans to pick a side. Are they going to be on this side or that side? To make sure his meaning wasn't missed for being to subtle, he invoked names from the actual American Civil War where Americans took up arms to kill each other! "Do you want to be on the side of Abraham Lincoln or Jefferson Davis?” Biden said. If you want the United States to descend into Civil War, Joe Biden is your guy.
This is a remarkable post.
You are so historically illiterate that you literally repeat the same sad arguments against equality and democracy that have been made for hundreds of years.
Take for example, you accusing Biden of dividing America. Did you know that Alabama accused Lincoln of dividing the country?
Upon the principles then announced by Mr. Lincoln and his leading friends, we are bound to expect his administration to be conducted. Hence it is, that in high places, among the Republican party, the election of Mr. Lincoln is hailed, not simply as [a] change of Administration, but as the inauguration of new principles, and a new theory of Government, and even as the downfall of slavery. Therefore it is that the election of Mr. Lincoln cannot be regarded otherwise than a solemn declaration, on the part of a great majority of the Northern people, of hostility to the South, her property and her institutions—nothing less than an open declaration of war—for the triumph of this new theory of Government destroys the property of the South, lays waste her fields, and inaugurates all the horrors of a San Domingo servile insurrection, consigning her citizens to assassinations, and her wives and daughters to pollution and violation, to gratify the lust of half-civilized Africans.
You brought up Jefferson Davis, he too made threats if elections didn't work out the way he wanted:
I say to you here as I have said to the Democracy of New York, if it should ever come to pass that the Constitution shall be perverted to the destruction of our rights so that we shall have the mere right as a feeble minority unprotected by the barrier of the Constitution to give an ineffectual negative vote in the Halls of Congress, we shall then bear to the federal government the relation our colonial fathers did to the British crown, and if we are worthy of our lineage we will in that event redeem our rights even if it be through the process of revolution.
The meaning of the Confederate flag is best discerned in the words of those who bore it.
www.theatlantic.com
You cited the poll which showed the majority of Americans believe democracy is in crisis. But you're too dishonest to tell the entire story:
A new
NPR/Ipsos poll finds that 64% of Americans believe U.S. democracy is "in crisis and at risk of failing." That sentiment is felt most acutely by Republicans:
Two-thirds of GOP respondents agree with the verifiably false claim that "voter fraud helped Joe Biden win the 2020 election" — a key pillar of the "Big Lie" that the election was stolen from former President Donald Trump.
The majority of those who believe democracy is at stake are upset because they don't believe Biden won. They want to believe the big lie.
Which goes to the root of the problem:
MANY AMERICANS ESPECIALLY ON THE RIGHT DO NOT WANT OR SUPPORT A MULTI-RACIAL DEMOCRACY.
Again, if you were historically literate, you'd know that this has been among the top problems in American society since the Civil War ended. Yes, slavery was technically outlawed but socially and politically, were blacks equal?
Throughout Reconstruction, blacks made strides in gaining political and social equality. They never obtained it but they made strides. The Republicans party with the help of loyal black voters kept things competitive between the two parties until the 1890s. This helped maintain black voting rights and representation.
Unfortunately, the late 19th and early 20th century put an end to that. In the 1890s the American south saw a horrendous economic recession. The Republicans party was thrown out of office and dropped its support of blacks. This encouraged the formation of black and white "fusionist" political parties and candidates. The Democratic establishment fearing these populist parties saw an opportunity. In order to regain power and repeal black voting rights and representation made blacks their scapegoat. They focused on white supremacy through hatred, fear, and often violence.
They accused blacks of ruining American democracy, making the recession worse, and taking the "white women." They preyed on the "fear" of whites being ruled by blacks. Here are a few of the hateful political cartoons of the pivotal 1898 election and race riots in North Carolina. Shortly after this election, blacks were stripped of office and voting rights until the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s.
1. Accusations of voter fraud from blacks. Hard not to see comparisons to the Big Lie spewing of dishonesty and controversy from the party of White Supremacy:
2. Preying on the fears of whites even going so far as to compare losing power to becoming enslaved:
3. Dividing Americans by conflating race with good governance:
4. Hinting at the use of violence being justified. Why is it justified? Because whiteness is honesty and "negro rule" isn't. Therefore, no white person could be honest by supporting blacks. therefore, violence and intimidation are completely justified in order to win political power:
So as you can see, the accusations of illiberal and racist forces in accusing those fighting for equality and democracy isn't new.
As you can see, white backlash against equality isn't new.
White supremacists fighting against equality and using fear and hate to fight back against democracy isn't anything new.
You would've fit right in with Jefferson Davis and segregationists.
You claim that the Civil War was over state's rights.
You blamed Lincoln for instigating it.
And now you're repeating the same tired attacks against equality and democracy as many of our white supremacists ancestors have done.
Time to learn from history man and change.