Why? If 7/10 is worth listening to, then 10/10 means you found your soulmate!
But the conversation will quickly become boring, unless one is the type that has no interest in learning anything more than what they already believe they know.
Why? If 7/10 is worth listening to, then 10/10 means you found your soulmate!
whatc out people will ccall you alt right and jordan peterson is 100% hate speech or so i have been told. yes i do listen to him quite a lot. read both his books alsoThis is as good a thread as any.
Recently been listening to Jordan Peterson debates and open forums.
He seems quite intelligent and I find myself agreeing with him a lot.
What are people’s thoughts on him? Good, bad and what am I missing?
battlefield v will fail.
because ea listened to the sjw's who literally are socialist and do buy things. adnd now people ar eboycotting battlefield v and sjw are not buycotting the game
i never played battlefield i dont like itOver female characters?
Get over yourself. If someone doesn’t buy this game over female soldiers it’s because they’re a dumbass.
FTFYTLDRTDDR
Yes really. Some opinions are so ****ing terrible that I don't really care what else someone might have to offer.
He brought it up in response to a question about the incel van driving murderer. He is advocating for the idea that the reason these men are driven to violence is due to their inability to find sexual partners, his solution to this problem isn't that these men need to improve themselves, rather that women need to stick with a single sexual partner so that these men have more opportunities in the sexual marketplace. Yeah, it's not as bad as rounding women up and handing them out ala Handmaids Tale, but it's still a pretty ****ed up and backward way of looking at things. And it reinforces in these young damaged minds that it's women who are to blame for their problems.I don't know what you're all bent out of shape over. Enforced monogamy is an anthropological term - it infers that the accepted social norms should lean towards people being in monogamous relationships; which supposedly leads to a more harmonious society. It doesn't mean forcing unattached women to attach themselves to unattached or undesirable men or blaming women because men who can't get laid can tend to become violent.
I disagree with Peterson because enforced monogamy could lead to a whole set of other unintended problems - unhappy marriages, divorce, depression, children in broken/stressful homes, financial strife. In short getting married at 22 because of societal norms or pressures is more of potential problem than a 40 year old virgin that can't get laid.
FTFY
you are too misinformed to undertsand jordan b peterson.He brought it up in response to a question about the incel van driving murderer. He is advocating for the idea that the reason these men are driven to violence is due to their inability to find sexual partners, his solution to this problem isn't that these men need to improve themselves, rather that women need to stick with a single sexual partner so that these men have more opportunities in the sexual marketplace. Yeah, it's not as bad as rounding women up and handing them out ala Handmaids Tale, but it's still a pretty ****ed up and backward way of looking at things. And it reinforces in these young damaged minds that it's women who are to blame for their problems.
You are right though that the idea of 'enforced monogamy' alone is not the problem here. Looking at Petersons comments in context though, are plainly ****ed up.
I see a lot of people on the right complain about how often he is misinterpreted. (I think the guy is purposely vague for this very reason) Frankly, Peterson does not deserve the benefit of the doubt. Take a look at the photo JimLes posted for a good example of why this is the case.
He brought it up in response to a question about the incel van driving murderer. He is advocating for the idea that the reason these men are driven to violence is due to their inability to find sexual partners, his solution to this problem isn't that these men need to improve themselves, rather that women need to stick with a single sexual partner so that these men have more opportunities in the sexual marketplace. Yeah, it's not as bad as rounding women up and handing them out ala Handmaids Tale, but it's still a pretty ****ed up and backward way of looking at things. And it reinforces in these young damaged minds that it's women who are to blame for their problems.
You are right though that the idea of 'enforced monogamy' alone is not the problem here. Looking at Petersons comments in context though, are plainly ****ed up.
I see a lot of people on the right complain about how often he is misinterpreted. (I think the guy is purposely vague for this very reason) Frankly, Peterson does not deserve the benefit of the doubt. Take a look at the photo JimLes posted for a good example of why this is the case.
Recently, a young man named Alek Minassian drove through Toronto trying to kill people with his van. Ten were killed, and he has been charged with first-degree murder for their deaths, and with attempted murder for 16 people who were injured. Mr. Minassian declared himself to be part of a misogynist group whose members call themselves incels. The term is short for “involuntary celibates,” though the group has evolved into a male supremacist movement made up of people — some celibate, some not — who believe that women should be treated as sexual objects with few rights. Some believe in forced “sexual redistribution,” in which a governing body would intervene in women’s lives to force them into sexual relationships.
Violent attacks are what happens when men do not have partners, Mr. Peterson says, and society needs to work to make sure those men are married.
“He was angry at God because women were rejecting him,” Mr. Peterson says of the Toronto killer. “The cure for that is enforced monogamy. That’s actually why monogamy emerges.”
Mr. Peterson does not pause when he says this. Enforced monogamy is, to him, simply a rational solution. Otherwise women will all only go for the most high-status men, he explains, and that couldn’t make either gender happy in the end.
“Half the men fail,” he says, meaning that they don’t procreate. “And no one cares about the men who fail.”
I laugh, because it is absurd.
But aside from interventions that would redistribute sex, Mr. Peterson is staunchly against what he calls “equality of outcomes,” or efforts to equalize society. He usually calls them pathological or evil.
. It's the same sort of thing as Trump and white nationalists. He uses vaguely racist language and people like David Duke and Richard Spencer love him for it, but when Trump himself is called out, the rest of the right wing comes to his defense.
good thing he moved the embassy to Jerusalem so the people wearing national socialist armbands who are stupid, and who believe the media get the messages that trump is no (neo)national socialist!If I was a political leader and I started noticing a bunch of people wearing nazi arm bands coming to my rallies it might cause a moment of introspection about just what it is I'm accomplishing. And why it is that my message is attracting these unsavory types rather than repelling them. It's not so different with Peterson and the MRA Incel crowd.
Your agenda has always been explicitly bigoted and you’ve earned every measure of dislike and contempt from me and anyone else on this board.when we dont like something because it is agenda pushing. we are racist sexist bigotted homphobic. nazis or whatever.
those words are becoming meaningless! but people keep doubling down.
at least i am not supporting the racist democrats whose racism is of the worse kind! the soft bigotry of low expectationsYour agenda has always been explicitly bigoted and you’ve earned every measure of dislike and contempt from me and anyone else on this board.
And you don’t even deny it.at least i am not supporting the racist democrats whose racism is of the worse kind! the soft bigotry of low expectations
Sure. Everyone's got to have their line in the sand though. If a person is espousing white supremacy or **** like forced monogamy, I'm out.
As far as his non-political stuff goes, I don't much go for Jungian psychobabble. I truly don't get his appeal.
“He was angry at God because women were rejecting him,” Mr. Peterson says of the Toronto killer. “The cure for that is enforced monogamy. That’s actually why monogamy emerges.”
Those are his words. Whether he is advocating for a government body to restribute sexual partners, or simply advocating for society to I dunno, do so on it's own, isn't really the point. Whether he means to or not (again it's remarkable how his use of vague language results in him claiming is being misinterpreted) the message he's getting across to incels is- it's not really your fault, it's those darn women who won't sleep with your that are to blame for your violent behaviors.
Look, there's a reason he's a huge hit with the incel crowd. He may not consider himself their ally, but they sure as **** do. It's the same sort of thing as Trump and white nationalists. He uses vaguely racist language and people like David Duke and Richard Spencer love him for it, but when Trump himself is called out, the rest of the right wing comes to his defense.
If I was a political leader and I started noticing a bunch of people wearing nazi arm bands coming to my rallies it might cause a moment of introspection about just what it is I'm accomplishing. And why it is that my message is attracting these unsavory types rather than repelling them. It's not so different with Peterson and the MRA Incel crowd.