What's new

The Official Bolerjack Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 95
  • Start date Start date
anyways, I'm sure I've made my point.

I got stuff to do.

--

As for this thread, Boler's voice (a decent thing) doesn't make up for his insanely low basketball intelligence. Listening to other announcers is painful sometimes, realizing how much better they are than ours.

The homerism isn't on Boston-Tommy's level (thank God) but other than his voice that's really all there is to offer.

I don't see him getting canned until he decides to move on. Whatever. At this point, it's almost become a nostalgic thing for me. I just laugh when he says skip-pass now.

Matt on the other hand, I think is totally totally fine. Not among the best, not among the worst either.

Decent?

Boler has a voice from the Gods.

Who cares about basketball IQ? I'm not looking for any TV announcer to educate me on basketball. Just speak well and have the occasional funny catch phrase and sound excited when some big **** happens.
 
I don't exactly agree that I started it. But whatever.

And, yeah, you accused me of being an internet tough guy... so I agreed to meet sometime so you could have a different experience. It's your assumptions that have run amok on both sides of this.

You *******. I didn't propose to meet offline. YOU did. So therefore you didn't AGREE to it. You lie.
 
I'm surprised he is so well liked maybe my expectations are too high. I do think he calls games like we are children at a monster truck show.
 
lol, Darkwing said "..even Bolerjack wouldn't have screwed up as bad as they did," and fish takes that as evidence of approval. lololol
Approval? Nah. Maybe not the worst? Ya.
 
You *******. I didn't propose to meet offline. YOU did. So therefore you didn't AGREE to it. You lie.

Dude... let's walk through this really slow:

1. You called me a tough internet M'Fer or something like that.
2. I offered to take our interaction offline if you wanted.

In other words, I'm not what you're accusing me of being. If you want to test your accusation, you can.
 
Dude... let's walk through this really slow:

1. You called me a tough internet M'Fer or something like that.
2. I offered to take our interaction offline if you wanted.

In other words, I'm not what you're accusing me of being. If you want to test your accusation, you can.

Fu
 
Turns out this is the official NAOS "the people who dislike me are pretty equally offset by the people who don't" thread. Hilarious.
 
I'm sure the lovers and haters of the Boler will love these:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbMAdP_CU1w
 
I'm surprised he is so well liked maybe my expectations are too high. I do think he calls games like we are children at a monster truck show.

That's what they usually want is to cater to LCD. I used to watch on mute, but Harpring improved to the point that I can listen, and as I think Loggrad mentioned, and Bolerjack hasn't done his 3 point call gave him a two thing on 18 foot jump shots.
 
That's what they usually want is to cater to LCD. I used to watch on mute, but Harpring improved to the point that I can listen,

Good point.

I'm happy Harpring takes his craft seriously and has improved considerably.
 
how does someone type this out, and not realize how condescending this comes across?

If you're as bad with social cues IRL as you are on here, there's a strong chance you're on the spectrum. In which case I gotta learn to be less hard on you, not call you NAOSpergers and stuff.

frreal, how does it make your heart feel that you've been making fun of me with the NAOSbergers stuff for years, and now you're actually learning I'm on the spectrum? How does this news ding your liberal credentials?
 
I shed a tear

[MENTION=848]dalamon[/MENTION], I'm calling on you, to hereby make a donation, to a charity to be determined by [MENTION=249]NAOS[/MENTION]

(NAOS, you didn't have to come out the closet like that.. we already knew)
 
Back
Top