The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

[Ferguson_Mellochill]

This is very rich for someone caught out posting flat out misinformation multiple times tonight. Maybe tomorrow try posting fewer lies, k?

I have 8 alerts from you today, and by and large, your rebuttals (if I call them that) have been, "Nah, I don't believe dat. That's a right-wing conspiracy."

And then you had a post that said, "Don't believe what Republicans are saying. Instead, believe this opinion piece in the Washington Post..."

Again, the good news is that evidence will come out in the hearings and hacks like you waiving your fist from the wilderness will die down.

 

[Zombie]

I have 8 alerts from you today, and by and large, your rebuttals (if I call them that) have been, "Nah, I don't believe dat. That's a right-wing conspiracy."

And then you had a post that said, "Don't believe what Republicans are saying. Instead, believe this opinion piece in the Washington Post..."

Again, the good news is that evidence will come out in the hearings and hacks like you waiving your fist from the wilderness will die down.

Oh, I see you're as deluded as the rest of the Trump crew on this site.

Out of curiosity, since you've been shown the federalist knowingly peddles falsehoods, is that going to color your perception of them at all?

Or are you going to continue to post their ********?

 

[colton]

Glad you found a safe space.

It wasn't about safety, it was about having my intelligence whittled away by having to read moronic posts.

 

[colton]

In case you're wondering why the whistleblower was able to file a complaint of "urgent concern" without having first-hand knowledge of the events he alleges took place, this is why...

Intel Community Secretly Gutted Requirement Of First-Hand Whistleblower Knowledge

Federal records show that the intelligence community secretly revised the formal whistleblower complaint form in August 2019 to eliminate the requirement of direct, first-hand knowledge of wrongdoing.

https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/2...rement-of-first-hand-whistleblower-knowledge/

Between May 2018 and August 2019, the intelligence community secretly eliminated a requirement that whistleblowers provide direct, first-hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoings. This raises questions about the intelligence community’s behavior regarding the August submission of a whistleblower complaint against President Donald Trump. The new complaint document no longer requires potential whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress to have direct, first-hand knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing that they are reporting.

The brand new version of the whistleblower complaint form, which was not made public until after the transcript of Trump’s July 25 phone call with the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and the complaint addressed to Congress were made public, eliminates the first-hand knowledge requirement and allows employees to file whistleblower complaints even if they have zero direct knowledge of underlying evidence and only “heard about [wrongdoing] from others.”

The internal properties of the newly revised “Disclosure of Urgent Concern” form, which the intelligence community inspector general (ICIG) requires to be submitted under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act (ICWPA), show that the document was uploaded on September 24, 2019, at 4:25 p.m., just days before the anti-Trump complaint was declassified and released to the public. The markings on the document state that it was revised in August 2019, but no specific date of revision is disclosed.

Your information is wrong. You need better sources.

 

[JazzGal]

That had nothing to do with the conversation at hand. I asked who Kavanaugh drugged and raped... What in the flying **** does Bill Cosby have to do with that? Nothing, zero, nada

It's nothing more than not a single one of you being able to answer my question and trying to change the conversation. You all are phycological pros at that.

Perhaps I misunderstood what you were asking. As I recall, you seemed to not believe that women are ever drugged and then raped. You asked for examples, and said something that led me to think you wanted examples other than Kavanaugh. If that wasn't what you meant, sorry.

Sent from my moto z3 using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[fishonjazz]

You asked "in what way is anyone here forgetting about Ukraine"

I gave you a way. There are multiple ways. I chose one and showed you. You left the Ukraine bone because it had no meat, and went back to the Russian bone because its been good to you. Its had a lot of meat. But actually the meat is gone. Now you are starving. You will bounce back and forth and eventually you will just eat the bones.(ill let you know when that happens). So this is going to end soon. You will have a new bone soon too.

You gave an answer to a question like “in what ways have we discussed things other than ukraine?”

Discussing one thing is not an example of forgetting something else. This is obvious.


Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[fishonjazz]

Not sure what your point is.

Obviously.
I was making fun of how jazzyfresh is always asking for proof about stuff and when you give him proof it is never good enough. And how he loves to say “i bet you $50 that this or that wont happen”
Its pretty funny


Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[Red]

I was kidding.

Of course you were kidding. Do you think I'm that stupid not to know that? I did laugh afterall...

You also gave me an opportunity to develop the ideas that had arisen in my mind with Trump's "not concerned" message to his Russian guests, so I took that opportunity in my reply to you.

And pointing out that some Americans apparently have the attitude "we had it coming because we do it too", and "so what if Russia interfered, who cares?" is relevant. And I also think we all know by now that if you don't want "long winded", don't ask me anything. Lol.

 

[Red]

Lol. You asked ME about earlier dams breaking, and I gave you MY opinion. And the opinion I gave you is how I saw things, not how Chris Mathews, et al, saw it. And the answer I gave you has not changed. I have a mind of my own, and do not slavishly follow pundits of any stripes. I'll bet a lot of those same folks were expecting more from Mueller's testimony as well, in fact they made it clear they did, and no dams broke at that point, either. This feels different, at this point. I'm not altering how I feel just because you have a different opinion.

 

[Deleted member 365]

Things are a little different when you appear on a regular news show. You can’t just screech lies and wild conspiracies into the echo chamber. This is great:





Cult 45 still won’t care. For them, it’s all about protecting Great Leader. But not just protecting, but cheerleading him. Great Leader was totally justified on that call and Biden and the “deep state” will pay for it (eventually). Just look at how the GOP’s only priority is to act like him:





What a personality cult. Nonstop victimization, paranoia, and anger.

 

[Deleted member 365]

And here is the full interview of Timothy Snyder, with Maddow introducing viewers to Snyder's "On Tyranny".



And a shorter interview of Snyder from awhile back...

This needed to be reposted, Snyder was amazing.

 

[Red]

Last night's SNL cold open....