Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by colton, Jul 16, 2019.
Keep reading that sentence there buddy. Sentences end with a period, FYI.
The report concluded that he committed no crimes the but...but...but... part means absolutely nothing in a court of law. 3 years and he couldn't rightfully find ANY crime so he's innocent. 100%. You can't be guilty of crime that was never committed.
That is absolutely not what it said. I'm done talking to you if you want to be willfully ignorant.
Lol of course. It's so predictable. It's some new outrage every...single...day. That's why I started the "let's impeach Trump again" thread. It only took 3 days lol.
Its the only way you'll beat Trump and you all know it but will never admit it.
"We conducted that investigation, and we kept the office of the Acting Attorney General apprised of the progress of our work. As set forth in our report, after that investigation, if we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that."
In other words I'm right again and your wrong.
You made up some crazy conspiracy that Mueller was dishonest in his report that specifically said no crimes was found. Some crazy fairy tale that Mueller had to leave things out of his report and couldn't talk about it. It's unfounded and paranoid delusion. I'm sorry to be a jerk but it's true. You're talking 100% conspiracy.
LOL how naive to believe that socialism means the complete redistribution of wealth, as if there are no wealthy people in Germany or Sweden.
Yet he clearly would've said that he did commit a crime as well.
They are not Socialist lol. Wow...
Nope, try again.
"After stating that he and his colleagues couldn’t clear Trump, Mueller reiterated that they also didn’t make any determination “as to whether the President did commit a crime.” Then he explained the reasoning behind this omission. Under a long-standing Department of Justice policy, “a President cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office,” he said. “That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view—that, too, is prohibited. The special counsel’s office is part of the Department of Justice, and, by regulation, it was bound by that department policy. Charging the President with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider.”
“It would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of an actual charge,”
That makes no sense lolololplolollol.
I demand you take this post down...
didn’t make any determination “as to whether the President did commit a crime"
back on ignore...
Did I violate your first amendment rights?
You are slow AF.
Except, Sweden and Germany are socialist.
Keep it that way. I didn't ask for your potential mass murdering *** to respond.