The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by colton, Jul 16, 2019.

  1. colton

    colton All Around Nice Guy Staff Member

    12,919
    3,263
    303
    May 25, 2010
     
  2. fishonjazz

    fishonjazz Well-Known Member Contributor 2019 Award Winner 2018 Award Winner

    57,992
    12,877
    388
    Nov 4, 2010
    Of course. They are idiots.

    Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
     
  3. BabyPeterzz

    BabyPeterzz Well-Known Member Contributor

    4,461
    702
    198
    May 26, 2010
    The problem is the R’s and Trump have to release all this early due to COVID response fall out. This **** would fly a few weeks out of an election, but this early? Ha. Good luck dudes.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  4. Avery

    Avery Well-Known Member

    3,438
    1,482
    228
    May 26, 2010
    Hope everyone realizes that we already do this via your phone. And know all your vices, browsing history, where you go, who you talk to, etc.
     
    JazzGal and fishonjazz like this.
  5. fishonjazz

    fishonjazz Well-Known Member Contributor 2019 Award Winner 2018 Award Winner

    57,992
    12,877
    388
    Nov 4, 2010
    Yep.

    What is bill gates motivation? What's his endgame? He gets microchips in all of us and then does what exactly?

    Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
     
  6. Avery

    Avery Well-Known Member

    3,438
    1,482
    228
    May 26, 2010
    He’s going to make us all buy unsold Zunes. We’ve got to get this son of a bitch.
     
  7. colton

    colton All Around Nice Guy Staff Member

    12,919
    3,263
    303
    May 25, 2010
    I shamefully admit I purchased one for my wife. It was so awful.
     
  8. Red

    Red Well-Known Member

    4,003
    1,458
    193
    Mar 17, 2015

    So we cherish free speech, enshrined in our Bill of Rights. And a free press, able to serve as a watchdog, shining light on power, and any potential abuses of that power. Yet, this permits an outlet like Fox to mold and manipulate the world view of its viewers, in a way that can be injurious to the body politic. Is it the job of a free press to promulgate and spread irrational conspiracy theories, with no basis in fact? The fact that Fox does this, to such a degree, is itself an abuse of the freedom we allow our press.

    But who serves as the ref, who determines that such and such press organization offers facts, and this is acceptable, and such and such a press organization offers conspiracy, filling the minds of its viewership with bs and false information as the basis for informing their political calculations, and can we call this unacceptable?

    Free speech and free press allows this, and allowing this permits the growth of ideas injurious to the body politic. Quite the conundrum. How to combat the spread of bs, while protecting free speech and a free press. To the extent an outlet like Fox encourages the growth of crackpot ideas that permeate a portion of the electorate, the goal, if goal it be, of an educated electorate, an electorate educated in the issues, an electorate able to recognize when political figures and certain media are cynically manipulating their thoughts and emotions, is rendered harder to achieve.

    Yet, free speech. And we accept that means allowing speech, ideas, that ultimately hurt the body politic, hurt when alternate realities with no basis in fact are the deliberate product of a free press organ using free speech to mold and manipulate the electorate with false alternative information. And no refs to whistle a flagrant foul.

    But, I am partisan, and anyone is free to zero in on an MSNBC media, and claim that is where alternative realities are being promulgated by our free press and media. And none of this is really new. Politicians of either party have their supporters and detractors in the media, and that has been the case for the life of our republic. It sure isn’t a perfect system, and, if there is a solution to these flaws, it escapes me.
     
    Last edited: May 23, 2020 at 6:30 AM
    olden_undercover likes this.
  9. fishonjazz

    fishonjazz Well-Known Member Contributor 2019 Award Winner 2018 Award Winner

    57,992
    12,877
    388
    Nov 4, 2010
    Douchebag K and Gameface like this.
  10. Political Jazz Fan

    Political Jazz Fan Well-Known Member

    592
    79
    48
    Nov 21, 2019
     
  11. Political Jazz Fan

    Political Jazz Fan Well-Known Member

    592
    79
    48
    Nov 21, 2019
     
  12. colton

    colton All Around Nice Guy Staff Member

    12,919
    3,263
    303
    May 25, 2010
     
  13. silesian

    silesian Well-Known Member

    5,690
    1,850
    228
    May 30, 2010
    Watching trump minions swing and miss on Biden over and over again is great sport.
     
  14. Gameface

    Gameface I actually REALLY like Gobert! Contributor 2018 Award Winner

    25,741
    8,042
    463
    May 25, 2010
    Well based on what I've heard some of his supporters say, that's probably because God has his hand up his *** and is operating him like a puppet.
     
  15. Douchebag K

    Douchebag K Well-Known Member

    9,881
    3,477
    263
    Nov 12, 2014

    Dude ffs you could have said all that in a couple of small paragraphs
     
  16. Douchebag K

    Douchebag K Well-Known Member

    9,881
    3,477
    263
    Nov 12, 2014
    that’s not any kind of proper scientific study.

    There are just too many variables to take into account but it seems pretty clear that drug doesn’t clearly have any great replicable specific beneficial effect. But the fretting about ppl taking it is pretty absurd, the side effects are predominantly long term use concerns
     
  17. colton

    colton All Around Nice Guy Staff Member

    12,919
    3,263
    303
    May 25, 2010
    It actually is. Here's the link to the study.

    https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31180-6/fulltext


    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lancet

    "The Lancet is a weekly peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is among the world's oldest and best-known general medical journals"

    Journal impact factor of 59 is crazy high, far higher than any scientific journal I've published in.
     
  18. infection

    infection Well-Known Member Staff Member 2019 Award Winner 2018 Award Winner

    14,356
    11,392
    463
    May 27, 2010
    I think what he meant to say was that it was not a randomized study, but instead an extraction of EMR data that divides into different groups based on clinical decisions and not any true randomization.
     
  19. Douchebag K

    Douchebag K Well-Known Member

    9,881
    3,477
    263
    Nov 12, 2014
    unless it’s a double blind randomised study it’s worth jack ****
     
  20. Gameface

    Gameface I actually REALLY like Gobert! Contributor 2018 Award Winner

    25,741
    8,042
    463
    May 25, 2010
    Your mom was a randomized double blind study.
     

Share This Page