What's new

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

"Last week, the Trump administration kicked over 700,000 people off of their food stamps just weeks before the holidays. Now, they’re proposing $738 billion in defense spending."

Thus remarked Congressman Ro Khanna, one of the few voices in power in Washington and in the U.S. corporate media that shatter the common pretense that war is free and everything else too expensive.

Earlier this month, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Adam Smith called the worst and biggest military spending bill we've seen "progressive." Ro Khanna stood up in Congress, surrounded by his colleagues, and called that language "Orwellian."

Khanna pointed out that the military budget being voted on was $120 billion larger than it had been just three years earlier. "That could fund free public college for every American," Khanna noted.

Congressman Khanna also effectively refuted the ridiculous notion that by spending more on wars you'll somehow end up with fewer wars, denouncing the spending and the "endless wars" thereby generated. Khanna insisted that we must hold Congress accountable for the current wars as long as it continues funding them.
 
I literally have not heard a single person say this. Where are you hearing it?

Did you not read the headline about the impeachment being about keeping Trump from appointing the next supreme court judge? Just one example. But in listening to family members and coworkers, that seems to be a point that they forget - that Pence would be the president, not Clinton or Pelosi.
 
Did you not read the headline about the impeachment being about keeping Trump from appointing the next supreme court judge? Just one example. But in listening to family members and coworkers, that seems to be a point that they forget - that Pence would be the president, not Clinton or Pelosi.

The Democrats are trying to undo the election! Amiright?
 
Did you not read the headline about the impeachment being about keeping Trump from appointing the next supreme court judge? Just one example.

It is a core republican value that no Supreme Court justice should be confirmed in the year before a presidential election. They should be chosen by the next president. Let the people decide who should pick the next SCOTUS judge.
 
The Democrats are trying to undo the election! Amiright?
No, but they’re running a losing campaign that will get Trump re-elected, by focusing the campaign on vigorously attacking Trump and pushing establishment candidates. Thanks Dems!
 
The Democrats are trying to undo the election! Amiright?
Sorry, @JazzGal, in case it's clear--by that I mean that I've read/heard similar comments by some Republicans that you have, which indicate that they don't understand impeachment at all. Hopefully it's a small minority but who knows.
 
No, but they’re running a losing campaign that will get Trump re-elected, by focusing the campaign on vigorously attacking Trump and pushing establishment candidates. Thanks Dems!

Actually, their establishment candidates do great against Trump in head-to-head polls. It's their ultra-liberal candidates which, if nominated, may lead to Trump getting a second term.
 
It is a core republican value that no Supreme Court justice should be confirmed in the year before a presidential election. They should be chosen by the next president. Let the people decide who should pick the next SCOTUS judge.

That was bad when the Republicans did it then, and would be equally bad if the Democrats were to do it now.
 
Actually, their establishment candidates do great against Trump in head-to-head polls. It's their ultra-liberal candidates which, if nominated, may lead to Trump getting a second term.
Nothing further from the truth, you defeat Trump with policy that favors the middle class, which is what a progressive can bring to the table with more conviction than any other candidate.
 
Actually, their establishment candidates do great against Trump in head-to-head polls. It's their ultra-liberal candidates which, if nominated, may lead to Trump getting a second term.

there you go again using facts and evidence. Sigh
 
I'd say 50% of them are totally uneducated ****ing idiots, 25% of them think Trump is helping them even though he's screwing them(that goes for the first 1/2 too), and another 25% are actually being helped either directly or indirectly. I might be off on that last percentage.
And then there's the ones that think of him as some kind of God

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
You've heard it too? Where?
Literally had a conversation with a guy on Facebook today who said that impeachment was all about trying to negate the election and get Hillary elected. 100% serious.

I will do a copy and paste of our conversation.

Him: if they were doing their job they would be serving the people not trying to negate the last election the president has done nothing but good for the country and the people but the stupid Democrats can't get over loosing the last election and want Hillary for president so no matter what he does or says doesn't matter to them get over it he won and the country is better off

Me: Negate the last election? Impeachment isn't time travel. That's not how impeachment works. Trump is still president as far as I know.
Also, if he were removed from office then Hillary wouldn't become president silly. Another conservative republican named Mike Pence would be the president.
Hope that helps you better understand the process.


Him: So what is the point they still won't get in the while house you are just another stupid Democrat with your head up your butt president Trump has done more for this country than any other president and he will win again in 2020

Me: I'm not a Democrat though. Maybe Trump will win again in 2020. I don't know. I was simply explaining to you how impeachment works. You're welcome.



That's the Facebook conversation I had today.

Note the spelling and punctuation in his posts. Trumpers have all the best spelling and punctuation.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Back
Top