What's new
By:

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

Political Jazz Fan said:
Hey, just like you guys...

Click to expand...

You're a couple plays behind big guy. Trump is no longer arguing that he's innocent of the charges, they've moved on to abuse of power not being an impeachable offense, as laughable as that is.

So you can give up this charade that he did nothing wrong and that this is some sort of witch hunt- that ship has sailed.
 
silesian said:
at least he didn’t break any laws.


The Government Accountability Office says President Trump broke the law when he withheld military aid to Ukraine after it had already been appropriated by Congress.



oops
Click to expand...
Whoa, this sounds like a game changer! For reference could you please tell us how many times the GAO said that Obama broke the law?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
The Thriller said:
So this is the Republican rationale now? Wow



keep in mind, Alan is one of Donald’s actual impeachment defenders. I’d give my next paycheck for a reporter to ask senators Romney, Lee, Collins, Gardner, and Murkowski what they think about Alan’s comment.
Click to expand...

He is making a constitutional argument. Is that too much for you to comprehend?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
Joe Bagadonuts said:
Whoa, this sounds like a game changer! For reference could you please tell us how many times the GAO said that Obama broke the law?
Click to expand...
Two wrongs not making a right notwithstanding - Trump violated that law in furtherance of his own personal interest,Obama's DoD did so to bring a US POW back home.
 
Zombie said:
Two wrongs not making a right notwithstanding - Trump violated that law in furtherance of his own personal interest,Obama's DoD did so to bring a US POW back home.
Click to expand...
The GAO accused Obama of breaking the law seven times. The GAO did not accuse or prove that Trump did anything for any more personal reason than Obama did. That's purely your spin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
Zombie said:
A very bad one, and one he wouldn't be making if he believed Trump wasn't guilty of abusing of power.
Click to expand...
He made a similar argument when Clinton was impeached. In 2016 he was public in his support of Hillary. He is not a Trump fan. He is a fan of the constitution. He's well respected and he is making a clear constitutional argument.
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
He is making a constitutional argument. Is that too much for you to comprehend?
Click to expand...

He claims that abuse of power isn’t an impeachable offense. Which is laughable. Not only did the founders make it clear that they feared the executive would gain too much power but they gave the legislative branch the impeachment to guard against the executive’s abuse of power.

If abuse of power isn’t impeachable, why even have impeachment in the constitution anyway?
 
I’m curious, do Trumpers not understand where this is headed? Are they this ignorant of history? This stupid?



maybe this answers my own question...

 
  • Like
Reactions: Red
The Thriller said:
He claims that abuse of power isn’t an impeachable offense. Which is laughable. Not only did the founders make it clear that they feared the executive would gain too much power but they gave the legislative branch the impeachment to guard against the executive’s abuse of power.

If abuse of power isn’t impeachable, why even have impeachment in the constitution anyway?
Click to expand...
Are you aware that Republicans consistently accuse Democrats of "abuse of power." Many Republicans believe that Obama and Clinton abused their power repeatedly. They kept using their power to do things that the Republicans didn't like at all. Have you ever heard of a crime called "abuse of power?" No, you haven't, because it doesn't exist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top