So, I'm going to take your question in good faith and assume you aren't being sarcastic, because I think you're a good dude, and I want to believe you intended it that way.
My answer: I don't
think so-- but I'm interested, if you have a link. Honestly. Message me privately, even, if you don't want to discuss it in the thread.
And listen, I heard part of Sekulow's presentation and all of Dershowitz's, and sincerely found their comments-- if I'm listening to learn-- incredibly interesting. They aren't making it easy for the House Managers. I have no doubt their examples where past presidents were accused and acquitted of abuse of power allegations can be argued with equally strong examples, though. And I also have no doubt recent presidents-- I have no problem saying Obama, even-- did things that may have qualified as abuses of power, under the House Managers' definition. But here's the thing: Nobody considered those abuses egregious enough to do something about it. I'm not terribly interested in "but Obama/Hilary/Biden/name-your-Democrat did it first!" conversations. We are way too hung up on that, in our dogmatic defense of whichever side of this issue we are on. I believe our politicians should very simply be held to a higher standard, and if it starts with the guy who not only engages in misconduct behind closed doors, but also behaves like a complete jackass publicly, then all the better-- let's start there. Then we apply that same standard to the not-so-public actions of future presidents-- Republican, Democrat, or otherwise-- regardless of their public image. But honestly, enough with what other people may or may not have gotten away with as a reason to excuse Trump... or anybody else, for that matter.