Sure, I think I could have an absolutely civil debate with him. I think he is frustrated because of the responses or lack there of, he gets from the other side. Then he turns it into spamming with additional posts. But look at some of the rebuttals from some posters, it’s frustrating to read.
I think Gameface and I are not very close politically, yet we have civil debates. There's topics that I will not engage him in because of my ignorance; it's better to learn than look like a fool. When we do debate, there is effort on both sides, rather than a quick gotcha line.
Strange that not one single person has ever had a civil debate with him. Not even one brow who is about as civil as anyone in history.
Here is the most recent post from their “civil” debate: Transphobe. You hate Trans people. I'm just going to start using your childish tactic you transphobe. You fell for an onion article. Fitting for a pathological lying troll. How embarrassing that you fell for a satire article.
Maybe the person who almost everyone ignores might just be the problem. I doubt you could have a civil debate with him if there was a topic that you two were on opposite sides about.
I mean this was his response to your recent post: So supporting Ukraine who is a well established fascist country is what? Ukraine is literally one of the most fascist countries in Europe. Am I wrong?
They have historically been as corrupt as any nation out there... Now we are sending 100s on billions to them....
There's extremest killing innocent people all over the globe and while it's terrible should we intervene? There's needless wars going on in Sudan, Israel and Palestine are constantly provoking each other, wars in Libya.
These are not our wars
How can you debate with that? He says ukraine is literally one of the most facist countries in europe. He post things like this all the time. How can you debate that? Is there a facism test that you can run to determine which european countries are the most and least facist? He posts things as fact without any data so often. Question that opinion and you just get spammed with a bunch of crap that has nothing to do with the discussion.
He compares russia invading a country militarily with extremists doing stuff and asks if we should intervene in every issue in the entire world. As if since we dont get involved in everything then we cant/shouldnt get involved in anything.
He says the war wouldnt have happened if trump were president. How do you debate that?
You should go ahead and try to debate him on some of the things he posts. I’ll bring the popcorn.