simple minded comments here.
Some of Russia's worst leaders in the twentieth century may have been "Jews" by blood or ethnic background, but secular or materialist in their minds. Race really has nothing to do with it, when the issue is motives or ideas. Hitler ran his holocaust program on racial rhetoric, but the idea of "Aryan" or white supremacy was more than a program against "Jews". It was meant to consolidate financial control of the world, specifically. The reason for it was the British deal with some bankers to cut off funds for the Kaiser during WWI. The creation of the state of "Israel" as we call it today was the British end of that deal. Without it, some believe England would have lost the war, even with US help.
In politics, the use of terms often goes to a least common denominator sort of rhetoric that "wins" in the public mind because of "simplicity". Usually that means something more like "Stupid".
George Soros, a Jew, has been funding "Nazi" elements in Eastern Europe, not because his real aim is racist or to create another holocaust, but because it is useful as a tool. Soros is not "Stupid", he just knows there are a lot of people in Eastern Europe who can be used because of their stupidity.
Putin's rhetoric justifying his invasion of Ukraine is actually "accurate" only in the claimed symbolism of the Azov Battalion or Regiment, or of other "stupid" folks who think the title useful in their self-serving aims. The real aim is to drive Russian people out of Ukraine. That is indeed a genocidal campaign, but it's not directed at "Jews". The practical aim is not even that. The Russian ethnic folks are not so much the problem as Putin's non-compliant statist regime that is more like a nuisance to "Progress" globally.
Russian propaganda and Russian disinformation are real things, but of the same class as our media propaganda and disinformation.
One aspect of war is missiles, bullets, bombs and crap, an equally distasteful side of war is propaganda. "Stupid" rhetorical "bombs" like activist and partisan comments.
In the Ukraine war, the lead up was the Zelensky government deciding to refuse to negotiate as the previous Ukrainian government had promised, dismissing the Minsk accords as obsolete, while Zelensky's military leaders ramped up boasting about how they were going to run the Russians or "Separatists" out of the Donbas. Russia had some tanks do parades across the borders, and NATO did training exercises in Eastern Europe, with Ukrainian units invited.
I think Biden's comments revealed an intent to start a war like Madeline Albrights comments about Kuwait helped instigate the Iraq war. I don't know why Putin decided to invade. I think he was suckered into that huge mistake on purpose. But other than that, he might be participating in a "Bowery" War like the Aztecs used to host with their ostensible enemies. You agree to put on a war for show, for practice, for developing armaments and seeing how they work. Whatever. The Aztecs and their neighbor kings each got some new slaves from the exercise, plus a day of drinking in the shade on a hilltop where they could watch the show.
But I still think a more probable purpose behind this war might be to simply get rid of Putin and install a compliant pro-British rube. Other "good" purposes might be to create an oil crisis, or secure Russian oil in "friendly" Western-influenced hands.
But the fact that I can articulate Putin's professed views and factually discuss the basis for his claims does not make me a propagandist for anyone. Comments like this from Thriller hardly rise above the personal attack level of discussion.
