The Official Welcome Back Rasp/Trout and Hopper/Taint Thread

[TroutBum]

You're stumped too, eh, Mo? Go figure, eh? Me too. This is the "rule" I have been told I must comply with on pain of banishment for disobedience. I was told to change my posting style so that I add to prior posts rather than make new ones. I have NEVER understood it, or the reason for it, either. Many attempts to find out what this rule is, and how it applies have garnered me no new insight. Kicky explicitly refuses to discuss the parameters of this so-called rule. He won't give what he wants to call "advisory opinions," in his words. What he WILL do, in a heartbeat, is issue an infraction whenever he determines that a vague "rule" has been violated. A very convenient tool to have for use against your "enemies," I spoze.

Do you how annoying it is to open up a thread and see 14 out of 18 posts by you? Almost as bad as when you're on ignore and you have to filter through 14 blocks of, "Hopper is currently on your ignore list." How do you not see that?

Anyhow, I am here to give you my full support of banning yourself. And I thought TaterBoob was pathetic. Just end it dude, we all hate you. (except Clutch)

 

[GVC]

Does hopper really think he's not the worst thread hijacker in jazzfanz history?

 

[Archie Moses]

Does hopper really think he's not the worst thread hijacker in jazzfanz history?

Don't let him steal my thunder, bro.

 

[C l u t c H 385]

_

Do you how annoying it is to open up a thread and see 14 out of 18 posts by you?

not at all?

Almost as bad as when you're on ignore and you have to filter through 14 blocks of, "Hopper is currently on your ignore list." How do you not see that?

Wahhhh! Wahhhh! Reading is harrrd!

Anyhow, I am here to give you my full support of banning yourself. And I thought TaterBoob was pathetic. Just end it dude, we all hate you. (except Clutch)

Ya know who else liked to speak for others and claim they hate people...Hitler.

 

[TroutBum]

<---- hates reading.

 

[Hopper]

As far as you're concerned, I WANT you to follow the standard procedure for QUOTING TEXT. That is by using the QUOTE TAGS that are provided for that purpose. Those are the tags that look like this - [ ] and [/ ] with the word QUOTE in the middle. I believe you know what they are and I believe you know how to use them, you just choose not to.

Yes, Mo, once again you emphatically reiterate what you "want" ("demand" is the better term, doncha think?). I have told you my reason, caused by a glitch in the malfunctioning software at this site, why I tend to avoid that. You totally ignore that of course. You don't care about my needs. You don't care if I end up with totally illegible posts 100 miles long because only one letter per line is displayed. What else is new, eh?

I have no inherent objection to using cartoon balloons. But given the state of the software here, using them tends to destroy the readability of the board for me.

 

[Archie Moses]

What's the difference between hopper's "annoying" style of posting and UB's style of posting in which he posts tons of annoying pictures in a row that clog up the boards?

 

[Hopper]

Does hopper really think he's not the worst thread hijacker in jazzfanz history?

I hope that aint no hangin crime round these here parts, eh, Commie?

 

[C l u t c H 385]

It always take mo than one ta hijack, I figya.

 

[TroutBum]

What's the difference between hopper's "annoying" style of posting and UB's style of posting in which he posts tons of annoying pictures in a row that clog up the boards?

UB is funny, Hopper is annoying. Consider yourself in the know now.

 

[Hopper]

What's the difference between hopper's "annoying" style of posting and UB's style of posting in which he posts tons of annoying pictures in a row that clog up the boards?

I've never complained about UB's posts, and I never will. But I must confess I'm not sure what he's trying to accomplish when he posts the exact same (unless there are some subtle differences which I am unable to detect) huge picture four or five times in a row. Bum finds this very entertaining, it seems. Mebbe he can explain what I missing, eh?

 

[sirkickyass]

What's the difference between hopper's "annoying" style of posting and UB's style of posting in which he posts tons of annoying pictures in a row that clog up the boards?

You're not in possession of the facts Archie. If you were you might know what UB has received his warnings/infractions for. Do you really think we've never discussed that exact issue?

As far as the forum being "open" and "public" the reality is that it's not truly and never has been. People, including Hopper, have been getting banned on these boards for years for not following the rules by not posting within specified paramaters. It is only through a relatively odd circumstance that everyone was invited back because there was no way for us to fully recomprise the ban list. The reality is that over 600 people, i.e. not gimmick duplicate accounts or spammers, have registered on these boards in the last few months and only two are in any real danger of having their right to post taken away. If 99.7% of the posters are able to post within the rules without any real problems, then frankly I'm not too worried about an overzealous moderating staff.