Donovan Mitchell might become a PG when he's like 32 years old and he has to drop his hero ball ego, but that isnt going to happen anytime soon.
Look,You can't compare Rudy and Don for the playoffs. Rudy has never dominated.
I don't think it's that you don't care about the comparison; I think it's that you don't know what the word comparison means.
Sent from my SM-A516U using JazzFanz mobile app
Donovan is going to be bad defensively at either guard position.I think Don would be a fine defender if he was playing the point position and we had a bigger guard who could take on tough assignments or a wing that could do that as well… I don’t understand why Mitchell appears to have a reluctance to play the point position on the regular. You got to think that if he wanted to play the point he would be playing the point.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mitchell has been great in the pick and roll. Arguably one of the best in the NBA this year. He is also creating a lot for others, just as much as anyone in our system. He has done it as well as Conley this season. Ingles is a distant 3rd this year. Mitchell is slightly better at it this year, but even last year he was solid here.Donovan is going to be bad defensively at either guard position.
Donovan isnt a PG because his best skill is unrelenting pursuit of being an aggressive offensive player. His passing is mediocre besides being a pretty good drive and kick player. He isn't going to help a guy get going. He doesn't make players around him better. He's going to put a lot of defensive pressure on his backcourt partner because that player will always have to guard the tougher matchup.
What's that line from Billy Maddison where he receives zero points... this post is that.This team is not built around Rudy. Its just as much and probably much more built around Mitchell.
Gobert has dominated in the playoffs and does not get exposed or drop off. He has dominated plenty in the playoffs. Iso offensive basketball is not the only way to dominate a game. Gobert cant create for himself, but that doesnt mean he cant dominate. He has a huge positive impact on both ends and stats back that up.
Were kind of ****ed no matter who we trade. You never get equal value back for a star player. You get 3 quarters back. We probably can get some decent picks but that isnt helping around either player for awhile. Its a step back for sure. But it might end up being the only option if there is a problem between the two. I dont know if there is though. Who we trade is dependent on what trades come up and what kind of commitment we have from the player staying I guess.If we are forced to trade either Mitchell or Gobert we have to trade Mitchell. His value will be way higher and we’d get way more for him. We’d be more likely to contend getting pieces for him than we would getting pieces for Gobert. Gobert is our entire defensive system where as we can make up the scoring we’d lose from Mitchell more than we could on defense from losing Gobert.
We aren't that far off. It's ain't that hard -Were kind of ****ed no matter who we trade. You never get equal value back for a star player. You get 3 quarters back. We probably can get some decent picks but that isnt helping around either player for awhile. Its a step back for sure. But it might end up being the only option if there is a problem between the two. I dont know if there is though. Who we trade is dependent on what trades come up and what kind of commitment we have from the player staying I guess.
Were kind of ****ed no matter who we trade. You never get equal value back for a star player. You get 3 quarters back. We probably can get some decent picks but that isnt helping around either player for awhile. Its a step back for sure. But it might end up being the only option if there is a problem between the two. I dont know if there is though. Who we trade is dependent on what trades come up and what kind of commitment we have from the player staying I guess.
No we got rid of Favors and added Bojan to give Mitchell more room work in, not Gobert. We brought in a veteran PG to let Mitchell play his more natural SG position that the team and Mitchell felt he was better at. You can create this false narrative in your head but it doesnt make it true. If we were building around Gobert we would have better defenders to help his strengths and have an elite defense. But we built around Mitchell and the offense, hoping Gobert could simply do his thing without any help from the other 4 positions. We gave Mitchell help so he wasnt our only offensive weapon. We gave him weapons to pass to and spread the court out so he wasnt double and triple teamed like we was earlier. The team has been pretty clear about catering to Mitchell.What's that line from Billy Maddison where he receives zero points... this post is that.
Built around Don? Lol. Let's have zero perimeter defenders around him and have two ball dominant small guys as running mates. We got rid of Favors to give more space to Rudy by adding Bojan.
Yeah built around him...him being Rudy Gobert.
Rudy couldn't dominate Capella. Or Adams. Or Jokic. Or 6'3" guys from LA.
I'm so tired of the lazy excuse making Jazz fans who don't know basketball. This fanbase doesn't deserve Donovan Mitchell.
Sent from my SM-A516U using JazzFanz mobile app