What's new
By:

Trade Rumors Involving the Jazz

That is a bad trade for Rudy. 4 times all NBA 3 times NBA player of the year. Led the league in rebounds. Protector of rim and a double double guy. Besides the pick will be bad considering how much better Atlanta will be with Rudy on the team. Hunter has potential but has been a disappointment so far in the league. I think this guy is just making stuff up to be honest.
 
Ferguson_Mellochill said:
Here's the link. Scroll down to the section on the NW Division. There is supposedly at least one more team involved, so that means more players and picks...

You can see it's ambitious from the Hawks' perspective, getting Lavine in a SNT for Collins, getting Gobert for Capella/Hunter/FRP, even potentially getting Colin Sexton from CLE.

www.hawksquawk.net

The cobbled together, stuff we held on to during the playoffs mega super rumor and team direction thread.

www.hawksquawk.net www.hawksquawk.net
Click to expand...
Lmao. Basically the third team would be trading a GLeague type player. Pass!!
 
cowhide said:
That is a bad trade for Rudy. 4 times all NBA 3 times NBA player of the year. Led the league in rebounds. Protector of rim and a double double guy. Besides the pick will be bad considering how much better Atlanta will be with Rudy on the team. Hunter has potential but has been a disappointment so far in the league. I think this guy is just making stuff up to be honest.
Click to expand...

I don't think he's making stuff up. I think he's heavily biased in favor of the Hawks. None of these deals have happened, so obviously they're not finalized. How credible this is remains to be seen, but it suggests that Gobert is a big target for the Hawks.

Even if you believe every word he says, there are several teams interested in Lavine, so Lavine to the Hawks might not happen. Ayton may not sign with CHA or PHX might keep him. If Ayton is not available, the Hornets may be interested in Gobert. And just because the Hawks and Jazz have discussed a deal for Gobert doesn't mean the Jazz will ultimately accept it. A framework for a deal isn't the same as a done deal. Jazz can still ask for more as the market for Gobert gets better defined.
 
Last edited:
Thee Idiotic Minivan K said:
If the jazz trade Gobert and keep Mitchell, I’ll burn down Jazzfanz
Click to expand...

If you believe what this guy is saying, he thinks the Jazz won't trade Mitchell unless they get a bonafide star in return. He mentions that the Jazz are watching what Portland does with Lillard.

I wonder what would happen if someone offers the Jazz a top-3 pick for Mitchell. Banchero could be a real franchise player if things break the right way.
 
Last edited:
Ferguson_Mellochill said:
If you believe what this guy is saying, he thinks the Jazz won't trade Mitchell unless they get a bonafide star in return. He mentions that the Jazz are watching what Portland does with Lillard.

I wonder what would happen if someone offers the Jazz a top-3 pick for Mitchell.
Click to expand...
I read the piece about the jazz. If the jazz trade Mitchell for Lillard and keep Gobert, I’ll treat Jazzfanz like it’s heaven on earth.
 
Minnesota landing Connelly from Denver is kinda scary… if they are competent and are able to build on their current group they could get quite good.
 
Jingled said:
I wonder if the Blazers would have any interest in Bogey if their pursuit of Jerami Grant falls through?


View: https://twitter.com/DimeUPROXX/status/1528835918928437248
Click to expand...

I would think so. I think 7 for Bogey is way too rich. I proposed the Milwaukee pick they own for Bogey and we get out of the tax completely. There may be some middle ground if they were to trade #7 to like OKC for #12 and Dort, or #12 and Williams plus a couple picks... then maybe #12 and Bledsoe is a fair deal. Bledsoe is non-guaranteed but to be traded they would have to guarantee the salary. If they waive him they really don't clear any cap space because of cap holds.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top