What's new

Trade Rumors Involving the Jazz

gotcha. it's a big difference - again especially considering curry was always injured and had that leap in him if he could get healthy.
I think injury limited his availability but not his shooting %'s. His 3 pt %'s were actually even better his first 5 years.

He just didn't shoot anywhere close to as many 3's as he should've on a per possession basis. Once he did, it propelled him to one of the greatest players of all-time status. Mitchell's already been shooting a high volume of 3's (and obviously isn't in the same stratosphere as Curry in terms of 3%).
 
I think injury limited his availability but not his shooting %'s. His 3 pt %'s were actually even better his first 5 years.

He just didn't shoot anywhere close to as many 3's as he should've on a per possession basis. Once he did, it propelled him to one of the greatest players of all-time status. Mitchell's already been shooting a high volume of 3's.
you just highlighted why TS% is a superior stat to eFG. what his injury limited was his athleticism - his TS% jumped so much once he got healthy because he was able to get to the line. his FT rate jumped by about 50% from his first four seasons to the rest of his career. you can't have a complete picture of offensive efficiency if you ignore a guy's ability to shoot and make FTs.
 
One season comparison? Cute.....

Please tell me these vast difference numbers.

Oh, and be sure to take into account that Curry got to play with Monta Ellis who averaged 24ppg when he played with Curry. And Curry got to play with Klay Thompson for 3 of his first five years. And Draymond Green. And Andre Iguodala.

Through their first 5 seasons, Curry and Donovan are very comparable.
That actually hurts your argument. Don, who is a great offensive weapon, probably isn’t scoring as much his first couple years if there were better offensive options on the team. Ellis took shots and opportunities away from Curry.
 
Holy **** - a couple percentage points better when he is surrounded by better offensive players.

You got me guys. Steph was on another planet his first 5 years. No comparison at all.

You lame asses will do anything to downgrade Donovan Mitchell. You just hate the guy. So pathetic for so called fans. You guys would rather lose on purpose than support Donovan Mitchell. You are disgraceful fans.

Sent from my SM-A516U using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Holy **** - a couple percentage points better when he is surrounded by better offensive players.

You got me guys. Steph was on another planet his first 5 years. No comparison at all.

You lame asses will do anything to downgrade Donovan Mitchell. You just hate the guy. So pathetic for so called fans. You guys would rather lose on purpose than support Donovan Mitchell. You are disgraceful fans.

Sent from my SM-A516U using JazzFanz mobile app
Saying Mitchell isn’t Curry isn’t hateful, spiteful, or downgrading him. It’s just stating the obvious.
 
That actually hurts your argument. Don, who is a great offensive weapon, probably isn’t scoring as much his first couple years if there were better offensive options on the team. Ellis took shots and opportunities away from Curry.
Helps Curry's efficiency when he's not being the focus of attention.

Pick an argument guys. You can't take every angle.

Don has been the absolute focus of our opponent's defense for 4.5 years. What he has done, has been pretty legendary. But keep on bashing him lame *** fans.

Sent from my SM-A516U using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Holy **** - a couple percentage points better when he is surrounded by better offensive players.
I made a mistake. It's actually a big difference (55.3% to 51.2%).

You got me guys. Steph was on another planet his first 5 years. No comparison at all.

You lame asses will do anything to downgrade Donovan Mitchell. You just hate the guy. So pathetic for so called fans. You guys would rather lose on purpose than support Donovan Mitchell. You are disgraceful fans.

Sent from my SM-A516U using JazzFanz mobile app
I don't know if you're aware of how you come off when you do this. There's good points being made and instead of addressing them, you just throw a tantrum. It's childish as hell.
 
I made a mistake. It's actually a big difference (55.3% to 51.2%).


I don't know if you're aware of how you come off when you do this. There's good points being made and instead of addressing them, you just throw a tantrum. It's childish as hell.
4%. Holy ****. 4%. Did that help him get to the playoffs every year?

Didn't think so....

Sent from my SM-A516U using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Helps Curry's efficiency when he's not being the focus of attention.

Pick an argument guys. You can't take every angle.

Don has been the absolute focus of our opponent's defense for 4.5 years. What he has done, has been pretty legendary. But keep on bashing him lame *** fans.

Sent from my SM-A516U using JazzFanz mobile app
We're so lame you should probably stop watching the Jazz so our lameness doesnt rub off on you oh righteous one.
 
Back
Top