Of course it helps his efficiency, but he’s also proven over time he’s efficient on his own. You didn’t want to use FG% for a reason, so don’t cozy up to it now.
Go start another thread of lies.
4% is the difference between average and great, fwiw.
man you are so pressed about facts.
Of course Curry looks amazing in hindsight. That's what makes this hard, but I'm talking about the first 5 years.
A 4% difference in EFG% is absolutely massive.
This. Maybe 55/45 toward Curry being generous.
I didn't say Don didn't have good weapons. I just said that Curry had better ones. Curry has gotten to play with Klay freaking Thompson. One of the best two way players in the history of the league. An elite shooter. Monta Ellis was also an elite scorer for a couple years there.
Like I said before - this is a like a Trump rally. Everybody with the same toxic mindset. Everybody is on board with just dumping Donovan and losing as much as possible. I'm holding out hope that we don't stoop to those levels.
Again, saying he’s not Curry is not beating down on him. It’s being intellectually honest. Don is a great player, nobody here is saying otherwise. It’s just that nobody other than you (and for good reason) believes his first 5 years track with Curry’s. You can spin and explain away all you want, but it’s just the plain truth. They were not playing at a similar level during those years.
