Tucker Carlson’s Rhetoric and White Replacement Theory

[babe]

No, not my agenda. The agenda of the alt-right, who know their agenda better than anyone, and say Tucker Carlson spreads it for them.


I understand you don't like the thoughts of all that they stand for.


Already done, I see.

Tucker talked about the trash, which is due to the numbers of people and the facilities. No Portapotties or trash cans. Biden and his folk are such poor planners, and unwilling to provide the necessities for these people.

But again, you should be ashamed of your dishonesty here. But it is the talking points you're handed, and you're just a loyal unthinking activist I know. Like the poor folk at guvmint camps generally doing what they're told, feeling they must because they have no credentials to decide otherwise.

This is wholesale abandonment of your brain and your conscience, bro.

The "alt righ" in your agenda does not exist except as created by the next level up in the hierarchy of agenda management. They have to create the monster in order to make it the fear gripping issue.

I have never met a white Supremacist. Tucker Carlson is not anything like that.

but no doubt, you can twist everything to fit your imagination.

Most of this kind of Republican comment is directed at stuff like homeless camps the Dems won't do anything about, the "Sanctuary" governments run by Dems who won't clean the streets or provide toilet service.

A lot of Americans decry this kind of filth, created by Dem governance.

 

[babe]

These people are so Catholic, that if Republicans would welcome them with open arms, most would vote Republican on the abortion issue alone.

I have to give you credit on this one. But Catholics who are taught Marxism in public schools. There's a pretty strong element of Marxist or Socialist at least, in the clergy ranks, so that even in Catholic schools a lot of such indoctrination takes place.

But beyond that, it's really the idea of economic opportunity that turns most of these newcomers towards more traditional American politics.

 

[babe]

Tucker talked about the trash, which is due to the numbers of people and the facilities. No Portapotties or trash cans. Biden and his folk are such poor planners, and unwilling to provide the necessities for these people.

But again, you should be ashamed of your dishonesty here. But it is the talking points you're handed, and you're just a loyal unthinking activist I know. Like the poor folk at guvmint camps generally doing what they're told, feeling they must because they have no credentials to decide otherwise.

This is wholesale abandonment of your brain and your conscience, bro.

The "alt righ" in your agenda does not exist except as created by the next level up in the hierarchy of agenda management. They have to create the monster in order to make it the fear gripping issue.

I have never met a white Supremacist. Tucker Carlson is not anything like that.

but no doubt, you can twist everything to fit your imagination.

Most of this kind of Republican comment is directed at stuff like homeless camps the Dems won't do anything about, the "Sanctuary" governments run by Dems who won't clean the streets or provide toilet service.

A lot of Americans decry this kind of filth, created by Dem governance.

Strange notion here.....

If the Dem governance decided to really help the homeless and the poor, and clean their streets, they could really make an impression on everyone.

 

[babe]

This is true. The founders of the progressive movement were almost as racist their opponents. Almost.


This is a lie. They recognize the racism of a Byrd (and his remorse) or a Sanger, just we do for Washington or Lincoln. That doesn't mean we ject everything done by these people.

Well, lie or not, I hope people will make corrections to their thinking, or their traditions, when the evidence shows the need.

 

[Archie Moses]

Already done, I see.

Seems pretty clear but I must have missed it.

As someone who is anti-white supremacy, can you please explain to me how that video promotes white supremacy?

I'm so confused.

I watched it thinking the guy was gonna say something horrible and be a hack.

I'm not sure, but maybe people are diluting what white supremacy really is.

White supremacy is bad, out dated, wrong and I condemn it to the highest degree.

Can we agree on that?

 

[Gameface]

Seems pretty clear but I must have missed it.

As someone who is anti-white supremacy, can you please explain to me how that video promotes white supremacy?

I'm so confused.

I watched it thinking the guy was gonna say something horrible and be a hack.

I'm not sure, but maybe people are diluting what white supremacy really is.

White supremacy is bad, out dated, wrong and I condemn it to the highest degree.

Can we agree on that?

I have not and have no plans to watch a Tucker Carlson video. I have no idea what he says and no interest in what he says.

So that out of the way I just want to say that I agree with you and I believe you.

 

[Deleted member 365]

I have not and have no plans to watch a Tucker Carlson video. I have no idea what he says and no interest in what he says.

So that out of the way I just want to say that I agree with you and I believe you.

Maybe it would’ve helped if you had watched it. But claiming that elites and Democrats are encouraging nonwhite immigration to replace conservative/Christian whites in order to change then politics in the country isn’t just a white supremacist dog whistle, but bull horn.

 

[One Brow]

Tucker talked about the trash, which is due to the numbers of people and the facilities.

He discussed the trash, and he discussed "replacement theory". The former is not tied to white supremacism, that latter is.

 

[One Brow]

Seems pretty clear but I must have missed it.

There are several posts already describing replacement theory, its history and meaning, etc. At some point repetition is pointless. You won't see what you refuse to see.

I'm not sure, but maybe people are diluting what white supremacy really is.

White supremacy is bad, out dated, wrong and I condemn it to the highest degree.

Can we agree on that?

I already agreed that you condemn it when described denotationally, but have a comfort level with the connotations.

 

[Deleted member 365]

 

[cowhide]

Tucker talked about the trash, which is due to the numbers of people and the facilities. No Portapotties or trash cans. Biden and his folk are such poor planners, and unwilling to provide the necessities for these people.

But again, you should be ashamed of your dishonesty here. But it is the talking points you're handed, and you're just a loyal unthinking activist I know. Like the poor folk at guvmint camps generally doing what they're told, feeling they must because they have no credentials to decide otherwise.

This is wholesale abandonment of your brain and your conscience, bro.

The "alt righ" in your agenda does not exist except as created by the next level up in the hierarchy of agenda management. They have to create the monster in order to make it the fear gripping issue.

I have never met a white Supremacist. Tucker Carlson is not anything like that.

but no doubt, you can twist everything to fit your imagination.

Most of this kind of Republican comment is directed at stuff like homeless camps the Dems won't do anything about, the "Sanctuary" governments run by Dems who won't clean the streets or provide toilet service.

A lot of Americans decry this kind of filth, created by Dem governance.

too funny. What did trump and the republicans do about the homeless. Absolutely NOTHING. Please your fake outrage about how democratic states are run while completely ignoring the fact how poor and uneducated most red states are. Lets not forget how any time of safety net the government provides is automatically deemed socialism. The fact that you are in white denial about Tucker Carson only shows how ridiculous your points are. Tucker should just wear a white hood on air so all debate whether he is or isn't racist can stop. Anyone with the slightest understanding of white supremacy in the USA would no he is.

 

[Archie Moses]

There are several posts already describing replacement theory, its history and meaning, etc. At some point repetition is pointless. You won't see what you refuse to see.


I already agreed that you condemn it when described denotationally, but have a comfort level with the connotations.

I haven't read the whole thread. I'm not sure why asking a simple question I have is pointless for you to help educate me.

Just talking about what I saw and heard.