What's new
By:

Utah vs. Boise in Las Vegas Bowl

SaltyDawg said:
You have a history of hating on the Utes. You have a history of being wrong about them. Period.


Sent from my HTC Evo using Tapatalk.
Click to expand...

One, I'm going to guess you should get your blood pressure checked.
Two, if being wrong about them once is a history, then yes, you're right, I have a history of being wrong about them.
Three, that is not as much a history as you have as being the running joke.
 
SaltyDawg said:
Safetydan and marcus are both just BYU trolls. They are Utah haters, of course they don't want to admit it on this board.
Click to expand...

You are flat out wrong about this. I am NOT a Utah hater. I cheer for them except when they play BYU. I have stated my feelings towards Utah consistently.

What I do hate is your blind homerism about how good they are, in particular this year, and your incessant need to make your opinion sound as if it is cold hard fact.

I will say this, I have never in my life wanted Utah to lose but after dealing with you I want Utah to get squashed against Boise. And I mean so squashed it takes them a decade to recover just so I can laugh at you while Utah dwells in the PAC basement alongside Washington State.

No, I don't hate Utah, just you.
 
KrazeeEyezKilla said:
One, I'm going to guess you should get your blood pressure checked.
Two, if being wrong about them once is a history, then yes, you're right, I have a history of being wrong about them.
Three, that is not as much a history as you have as being the running joke.
Click to expand...

I have seriously never seen you say anything good about the Utes. And I am not a running joke, lol. A few haters like to stalk me but no big deal.

Sent from my HTC Evo using Tapatalk.
 
Marcus said:
You are flat out wrong about this. I am NOT a Utah hater. I cheer for them except when they play BYU. I have stated my feelings towards Utah consistently.

What I do hate is your blind homerism about how good they are, in particular this year, and your incessant need to make your opinion sound as if it is cold hard fact.

I will say this, I have never in my life wanted Utah to lose but after dealing with you I want Utah to get squashed against Boise. And I mean so squashed it takes them a decade to recover just so I can laugh at you while Utah dwells in the PAC basement alongside Washington State.

No, I don't hate Utah, just you.
Click to expand...

I ****ing love you.
 
Marcus said:
You are flat out wrong about this. I am NOT a Utah hater. I cheer for them except when they play BYU. I have stated my feelings towards Utah consistently.

What I do hate is your blind homerism about how good they are, in particular this year, and your incessant need to make your opinion sound as if it is cold hard fact.

I will say this, I have never in my life wanted Utah to lose but after dealing with you I want Utah to get squashed against Boise. And I mean so squashed it takes them a decade to recover just so I can laugh at you while Utah dwells in the PAC basement alongside Washington State.

No, I don't hate Utah, just you.
Click to expand...

So you didn't start hating Utah until you started hating me for liking them? Lol


Sent from my HTC Evo using Tapatalk.
 
I am not taking any side here, but just for the record, my opinion is:

Auburn v. Oregon = BCS caliber bowl.
Wisconsin v. TCU = BCS caliber bowl.

Va Tech v. Stanford = Stanford has a great team this year, but this is borderline.

Arkansas v. Ohio St. = Meh. Called a BCS bowl, but hardly BCS caliber.

Oklahoma v. UConn = Seriously? This is definitely not a BCS caliber bowl. Minor bowls I would rather watch than this one: Vegas, Poinsettia, Insight, Chick-fil-A, and Capital One.

IMO, being called a BCS bowl, does not make a game BCS caliber, automatically. If the BCS wanted to be true to it's alleged purpose, it would match 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, etc. Instead, we get to watch the Big Least champ stink it up yet again.
 
Bronco70 said:
I am not taking any side here, but just for the record, my opinion is:

Auburn v. Oregon = BCS caliber bowl.
Wisconsin v. TCU = BCS caliber bowl.

Va Tech v. Stanford = Stanford has a great team this year, but this is borderline.

Arkansas v. Ohio St. = Meh. Called a BCS bowl, but hardly BCS caliber.

Oklahoma v. UConn = Seriously? This is definitely not a BCS caliber bowl. Minor bowls I would rather watch than this one: Vegas, Poinsettia, Insight, Chick-fil-A, and Capital One.

IMO, being called a BCS bowl, does not make a game BCS caliber, automatically. If the BCS wanted to be true to it's alleged purpose, it would match 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, etc. Instead, we get to watch the Big Least champ stink it up yet again.
Click to expand...

If this game is a better game than actual BCS games, then I don't see how you can say it isn't BCS caliber.

You may wish the BCS matched up 3-4, 5-6, etc, but it doesn't. The Big East and/or ACC send stinkers to the BCS almost every year.

Sent from my HTC Evo using Tapatalk.
 
Re-watching the Boise-Nevada, I'd say Boise faltering in the 2nd half was a lot to do with the receivers butter fingers and not making plays, they dropped several well thrown passes from kellen moore. moore is as good as advertised but i'd say don't underrate their RB Doug Martin is a bowling ball and Boise does a good job run blocking. They are a physical team no doubt. Nevada had a tough time running the ball in the 1st half. I'd say we have to bring out the bag of tricks in the running game, just lining up in I formation and go right at them isn't going to work. Cain's going to have to be a dynamic QB who will have to play the game of his life just to keep us in it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top