Not true at all. If any true change has happened, he's just changed perceived establishment politicians for establishment welfare queens. The swamp never went away, nor is it going to. We just have ******** water.
"We're going to war, bro."
- Thread starter str8line
- Start date
Not true at all. If any true change has happened, he's just changed perceived establishment politicians for establishment welfare queens. The swamp never went away, nor is it going to. We just have ******** water.
I don't imagine the bureaucracy has gone, or will go, away. The best I could hope for is to reduce staffing numbers and shave off some old deadwood here and there, and eliminate the SES "above the Law" set.
But I hope at this particular moment in time that the fascist, former Nazi-sympathizer, fake Islamist real western political extremist regime in Tehran will have to give up the ghost. Sure, it will mean we have a continuing population explosion in the region, and sure there are no real democracies to be hoped for.
I think Trump has told his people "We have done all we could imagine or invent to change the Middle East, and it's still what it is. So I don't think we're going to change it."
I still think most of the old anti-war base has been turning out for Trump rallies. It's the best shot we have at peace.
Now mixing; zero statistical evidence with moving the goal posts.
so, do you love logical fallacies that much?
False argument that there is not statistical evidence for a need to practically ensure fair elections despite your having no statistical evidence we don't need to do that.
False, unsubstantiated arguments drawn from sheer imagination about who votes for Trump, and what their views are on American foreign policy.
Falsely claiming Trumps view of no American interest in promoting regime change, probably even in Iran is coherent with his view that an attack on an American embassy, supported by Iran and planned and executed by Iran's #2 in command, is an act of war we have every right to respond to, appropriately, and in logical coherence with the offense, by just taking out that one damn opponent. Trump does not believe in "nationalism" enough to blame or go to war with the whole of Iran unless the whole of Iran attacks us first. And he doesn't want to do that. Khomeini has his hands full. There are enough Iranians who want him to fly off to Lebanon and maybe march his loyalists over into Iraq or Syria somehow.
And, apparently, our democrat congress under Pelosi, and the entire slate of democrat candidates for the Presidency, will continue to weigh in on Iran's side even if Iran mounts a massive offensive all over the world against US embassies and military assets.
American citizens have every right to be concerned about this Pelosi coup.
The moving goal posts are the democrats in this country going down to electoral defeat because they are against basic American security. Open Borders and well-funded Terrorists roaming the globe, that's the Pelosi Utopia.
D
Deleted member 365
Guest
Lol. Confusing theocracy with fascism is funny
Red
Well-Known Member
https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/13/politics/state-embassy-threat-iran-blindsideded/index.html
Washington (CNN)State Department officials involved in US embassy security were not made aware of imminent threats to four specific US embassies, two State Department officials tell CNN, further undermining President Donald Trump's claims that the top Iranian general he ordered killed earlier this month posed an imminent threat to the diplomatic outposts.
Without knowledge of any alleged threats, the State Department didn't issue warnings about specific dangers to any US embassy before the administration targeted Qasem Soleimani, Iran's second most powerful official, according to the sources.
The State Department sent a global warning to all US embassies before the strike occurred, a senior State Department official said and the department spokesperson confirmed, but it was not directed at specific embassies and did not warn of an imminent attack.
One senior State Department official described being "blindsided" when the administration justified the deadly Reaper drone strike on Soleimani by saying Iran's "shadow commander" was behind an imminent threat to blow up US embassies. CNN has reached out to the White House for comment on claims that the State Department officials were taken by surprise.
Last edited:
There is no coup. Accept it.
Really though... he's in that category that has lost the right to say "just playin"
Jazzta
Guest
I don’t like this post. Hillary is no better, look what happened in Libya. We had the worst of the worst running against each other in 2016.