Which five-man combo would you rather see at the end of a game?

[Joncolton]

If you put your 5 best players on the floor to finish the game, that could be:

Mitchell, Clarkson, Ingles, Bogdanovic, Gobert

I don't think Clarkson was better than Conley last season, but this season he might pass him. Also 6'5" vs 6'1" could make a difference on both ends.

 

[NAOS]

If you put your 5 best players on the floor to finish the game, that could be:

Mitchell, Clarkson, Ingles, Bogdanovic, Gobert

I don't think Clarkson was better than Conley last season, but this season he might pass him. Also 6'5" vs 6'1" could make a difference on both ends.

Cool off-topic comment. You haven’t voted

 

[Joncolton]

Cool off-topic comment. You haven’t voted

Well, the combo I would like to see was not a voting option. This seems to happen to me everywhere.

 

[NAOS]

****ing hell. So hard around here.

 

[NAOS]

Well, the combo I would like to see was not a voting option. This seems to happen to me everywhere.

This isn’t about what you want. Or about what I want. Or about what’s ideal for the jazz. This is ****ing obvious and has been mentioned repeatedly. Christ!

 

[Handlogten's Heros]

This isn’t about what you want. Or about what I want. Or about what’s ideal for the jazz. This is ****ing obvious and has been mentioned repeatedly. Christ!

Yes but what if the lineup I like isn’t listed?

 

[Handlogten's Heros]

I’m giving you a hard time obvi

 

[NAOS]

I’m giving you a hard time obvi

Definitely knew that. I laughed.

 

[infection]

I don't think Clarkson was better than Conley last season, but this season he might pass him. Also 6'5" vs 6'1" could make a difference on both ends.

This might be backwards. Conley's numbers came out a little okay-ish because he did alright in the bubble, but Conley had a disastrous season. I have a hard time thinking he could have a worse season this year than he did last. Clarkson was pretty good last season.

 

[Thee Jazz Fan]

If there was a choice where both Conley and favors sat in crunch time. I’d pick that.

 

[NUMBERICA]

There are matchups I think the Favs and Rudy combo will be helpful with. There aren’t a ton but sometimes.

The other lineup seems to have a ton of creation, shooting, and ball handling but I always kept hoping for some Spurs beautiful game magic with the Mike, DM, Ingles lineups and it never felt like the whole equaled the sum of its parts.

I don't disagree that Favors could play some 4, but any lineup that slots Joe or Bojan as the nominal 2 gets a puke emoji from me. That lineup is lumbering as a mother-****er.

And lineup 1 doesn't work. Not enough touches to go around.

People love to bag on Royce but he kinda makes everything work since we have so many people that want to handle the ball and/or score, while having no one else that is athletic enough, big enough, and skilled enough to matchup with the NBA's most dangerous scorers. Royce isn't even a great option for any one thing, but he's the best we got as a jack-of-all-trades guy that is our best perimeter defender by default.

 

[NAOS]

I don't disagree that Favors could play some 4, but any lineup that slots Joe or Bojan as the nominal 2 gets a puke emoji from me. That lineup is lumbering as a mother-****er.

And lineup 1 doesn't work. Not enough touches to go around.

Dumb people love to bag on Royce but he kinda makes everything work since we have so many people that want to handle the ball and/or score, while having no one else that is athletic enough, big enough, and skilled enough to matchup with the NBA's most dangerous scorers. Royce isn't even a great option for any one thing, but he's the best we got as a jack-of-all-trades guy that is our best perimeter defender by default.

Fify