What's new

Who Should the Jazz Cut?

It was interesting last night how often the Jazz went to a no PG lineup, and even with NWG in the game he rarely played the part of a PG. Quinn seems intent on letting everyone handle the ball, Royce had the ball in his hands a lot with the "second" unit. All this to say, he seems intent on being able to survive without a natural PG on the floor. NWG can go in my opinion, I liked Howard.
NWG seemed to struggle bringing the ball up the court at times.
 
Stanton Kidd. I believe NWG will show a lot more than he did. He improved a lot in Europe.

Howard or Niang competes for minutes.
 
Stanton Kidd. I believe NWG will show a lot more than he did. He improved a lot in Europe.

Howard or Niang competes for minutes.
I think best case NWG is like a score first Neto, but there have been a string of physically underwhelming PG's in the NBA who have had a lot of success (VanVleet and Monte Morris) so maybe there is room for potential.
 
Lmao. As much as I hate agreeing with Cy, this kind of comment is just pure derp. Both Favors and Udoh were very good backups at the 5 last year. The fact that Bradley couldn't beat them out for minutes in his 2nd year doesn't mean a ****ing thing.

Bradley may end up being good or he may not, but right now there just isn't enough evidence to be drawing conclusions either way. Not being able to beat out Favors or Udoh for minutes doesn't mean jack ****.
Would old-school rep this.
 
I think best case NWG is like a score first Neto, but there have been a string of physically underwhelming PG's in the NBA who have had a lot of success (VanVleet and Monte Morris) so maybe there is room for potential.
I think if NWG can hit on better than 40% of his threes (the bulk of which would be catch-n-shoot), then he’s a nice piece. Body control and finishing on his drives looks much improved. If he can get people closing out hard, then he can create advantages.
 
I was at the game last night. Here are a few comments...

NWG: The Jazz just brought him over from Europe. He can do the things that Neto did for us. He plays decent position-defense, can hit some open shots, and can credibly drive to the rim and finish without getting injured. He's fine for a 3rd-string PG, and he'll make the roster.

Bradley: He has gravity at the rim, he rebounds as well as Kanter did at the same age, and he's a credible roll-man who can catch and finish efficiently. He's fine as a 3rd-string center. He'll get exposed a bit guarding out on the floor, but against back-ups it shouldn't be too big a problem.

Oni: He is already a multi-positional defender, an adequate corner-3pt shooter, and an athlete who can fill the lane and finish at the rim. He's not going anywhere. He's a steal for a late 2nd-round pick. If he could dribble and change directions, he'd have star potential. He's going to be a text-book 3/D wing with plus speed and athleticism. He's smart and disciplined, perfect for the Jazz's system, and he's better than Royce was as a rookie.

Where the Jazz have a log-jam is the 3rd-string PF spot, where we have Niang, Kidd and Howard. The Jazz can keep two of these guys and play one of them as a 3rd-string SF. That's why both Howard and Kidd were on the floor together last night. TBH, I'd like to see Brantley in that mix as well, but the Jazz can develop him in the G-League and give him a few assignments with the Jazz if they want.

Howard: He's really a wing, so think of him as the 3rd SF. He's not used to the speed of the NBA game, and he needs to work on his strength a bit. He likes to hang out on the perimeter for catch-and-shoot opportunities. He's a knock-down shooter with an easy, smooth stroke out to 28 feet. He keeps his composure and shoots well under game pressure. He was 3/3 last night and hit from multiple locations around the arc. Guys were passing up shots to get him the ball. I also liked the way he attacked a close-out and finished with a reverse lay-up. The Jazz bought out his contract in Europe, and even though it isn't much, I'd be surprised if they cut him.

So to me, the question comes down to keeping Kidd or Niang. The problem with Kidd is that he's an inconsistent shooter. If he shoots a 3, I expect it to miss. If he'll defend and rebound that makes up for some of it, but I'm not sure how consistently he does that. The problem with Niang is that he's a non-athlete by NBA standards. That limits his defense, rebounding and play off the dribble. He's a smart player who knows the system. He's a better shooter and passer than Kidd, and that will probably make the difference.

Probably Kidd is the guy who gets cut, and the 15-man roster would look like this:

Conley / Mudiay / Williams-Goss
Mitchell / Exum / Oni
Bogdanovic / O'Neale / Howard
Green / Ingles / Niang
Gobert / Davis / Bradley
 
The two candidates to be cut are Kidd or Howard as they are the only two partially guaranteed players.

The Jazz could cut someone like NWG, Oni, Bradley, Mudiay, or Niang though at a very low cost.
Howard: Seems like he can really shoot and he seems longer/quicker than Niang.

Kidd: Athletic and strong. Jazz might need some Royce insurance as well if he gets overpaid next year.

NWG: Unremarkable backup PG. Seems like a good shooter though. Do the Jazz really need a 4th PG though, especially when they have so many other players who play quasi-backup PG?

Oni: Don't see anyway he gets cut personally.

Bradley: Doubt he gets cut since the Jazz only have two other centers.

Mudiay: Doubt he gets cut with his potential and sizee

Niang: Doubt he gets cut because of his locker-room presence and shooting ability.

So overall I think there are two spots for Kidd, NWG, and Howard. And right now I'd probably cut NWG.
I agree with everything here. Must be the end of times.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
 
Howard came out of nowhere.

If he can shoot like that all the time he has to stay. His shot looked so smooth.

Lets see how he holds up against better comp
 
Back
Top