Why is bumping an old thread an infractable offense?

Discussion in 'Site Feedback' started by NPC D4617, Feb 2, 2016.

  1. Joe Bagadonuts

    Joe Bagadonuts Well-Known Member

    10,137
    1,500
    228
    Aug 23, 2010
    Wouldn't it be bizarre if one day there was a major conflict on this board that didn't involve NAOS?
     
  2. NAOS

    NAOS Well-Known Member

    18,859
    3,358
    263
    May 27, 2010

    your perceptions's high-degree of selectivity is astounding. As well as the duration of your butthurt.
     
  3. NPC D4617

    NPC D4617 Well-Known Member

    20,398
    2,584
    263
    Aug 10, 2012
    Are you really that defensive and easily offended by someone saying they predicted something, that it becomes an accusation against you?

    How ****ing crazy are you?
     
  4. Saint Cy of JFC

    Saint Cy of JFC Well-Known Member

    80,863
    8,534
    393
    May 27, 2010
    Did Hack and NAOS really get banned for bumping threads? Seems kind of ****ed up. That has never been on a rule on the site.
     
  5. Nate505

    Nate505 Modstapo Lite Staff Member

    7,868
    981
    203
    May 25, 2010
    Pretty much this.
     
  6. ♪alt13

    ♪alt13 Well-Known Member

    11,472
    980
    198
    Jul 5, 2013
    Yeah. This seems like an overreaction by the modstappo. It was annoying that last night there was a bunch of threads that I didn't give 2 ****s about muddying up the site but this thread wasn't hurting anything(it's less than 2 pages). I think the mods need to have thicker skin sometimes. Y'all should be comfortable with criticism. It's quite clear that you're not.
     
  7. Stoked

    Stoked Well-Known Member Contributor 2018 Award Winner

    38,981
    5,572
    388
    Dec 13, 2011
    They got 3 infractions and got banned. Had nothing to do with this thread.
     
  8. ♪alt13

    ♪alt13 Well-Known Member

    11,472
    980
    198
    Jul 5, 2013
    They both must have gotten one today right? Considering that they were posting today. What did that get infracterized for this afternoon? Did they get a fractification for this thread? I didn't notice anything that seemed infractable.

    PS I hope this post wasn't borderline infractish
     
  9. Stoked

    Stoked Well-Known Member Contributor 2018 Award Winner

    38,981
    5,572
    388
    Dec 13, 2011
    I won't get into details but it was nothing from this thread. I also see nothing in here that is infractable. Yes they both hit the magic number today.

    Edit: Yes they timing looks suspicious and I can see how it looks that way. Which is why I am here to say it wasn't this thread.
     
  10. ♪alt13

    ♪alt13 Well-Known Member

    11,472
    980
    198
    Jul 5, 2013
    I don't know why you have to act like such an infracterator about it, geesh.
     
  11. Stoked

    Stoked Well-Known Member Contributor 2018 Award Winner

    38,981
    5,572
    388
    Dec 13, 2011
    Infracterator? lol, nicely done.
     
  12. Joe Bagadonuts

    Joe Bagadonuts Well-Known Member

    10,137
    1,500
    228
    Aug 23, 2010
    Lol.
     
  13. Saint Cy of JFC

    Saint Cy of JFC Well-Known Member

    80,863
    8,534
    393
    May 27, 2010
    They get fracted for what they said in the threads or simply the act of bumping threads?

    NVM, I read further.
     
  14. colton

    colton All Around Nice Guy Staff Member

    12,437
    2,660
    268
    May 25, 2010
    Pot calling the kettle black.

    We cannot possibly decide who is the "initiater" and who is the "defender" in every conflict. In fact, it's completely impossible to do so in the vast majority of the conflicts that occur here at jazzfanz because of their escalating nature.

    If they get warned/infracted, then YES THEY HAVE. And eventually the discouragement results in a ban.

    You're still making the mistake of thinking that we care about who is defending/who is attacking, when in actuality both are doing both (the vast majority of times). Therefore we tend to judge posts on a case-by-case basis, or sometimes a batch of related posts at once.

    Pot calling the kettle black.
     
  15. colton

    colton All Around Nice Guy Staff Member

    12,437
    2,660
    268
    May 25, 2010
    https://jazzfanz.com/faq.php
     
  16. colton

    colton All Around Nice Guy Staff Member

    12,437
    2,660
    268
    May 25, 2010
    To be more specific, I think they were each at 1 infraction. Then they each got one for spamming the board with their necro-bumps. Then they each got one more for inappropriate/abusive language due to posts in other places (i.e. nothing related to this thread). That put them each at 3 infractions, which resulted in a temporary ban for each.
     
  17. ♪alt13

    ♪alt13 Well-Known Member

    11,472
    980
    198
    Jul 5, 2013
    No fracting way! That's unfractingbelievable.

    [​IMG]
     
  18. Nate505

    Nate505 Modstapo Lite Staff Member

    7,868
    981
    203
    May 25, 2010
    I have no problem saying I voted for a fract for all the necro bumping. It was irritating beyond belief, and I'm not the only one who felt that way.

    They both needed a break anyway. Their back and forths were getting well beyond the line. I'm sure they'll be back in a week to whine about it though.
     
  19. Stoked

    Stoked Well-Known Member Contributor 2018 Award Winner

    38,981
    5,572
    388
    Dec 13, 2011
    I also voted for the infractions. They have been going at it for weeks now and enough is enough.
     
    Maneesh likes this.
  20. fishonjazz

    fishonjazz Well-Known Member Contributor 2019 Award Winner 2018 Award Winner

    54,698
    10,261
    388
    Nov 4, 2010
    Lol
     

Share This Page