If only judges, lawyers, and law makers could pull their heads out of their asses. I don't expect it to happen to me, but if I get divorced, I'm screwed. Soon to be six kids, wife hasn't worked since my oldest was about two. I would literally be forced to live in my parents basement while 110% of my paycheck went to someone else. My only saving grace might be that I'm now self-employed. I could find ways to hide some income/purchases.I've kind of wanted to say that in this thread I'm 100% biased in favor of the male POV. I'm a man and I've mostly heard about divorce from other men. So my sympathy has to do mostly with what men have gone through. I haven't had the same conversations with women. I haven't ever known a woman who had to send the majority of her earned post tax income to support her ex and his new lady, leaving her living at a standard well below what she had before the divorce while the ex enjoys the standard of living he always had, but I see that frequently with men.
I think men should have to pay some child support if they don't have primary custody, but I think the woman should have to show receipts demonstrating that the money is being paid directly for the children's expenses. And I think the standard of living of both the man and the woman should factor into how much is paid. If a guy making over 50K/year lives like someone below the poverty line, something is wrong. He shouldn't have to pay so that while his kids are at mom's they have all the comforts and while they're with him they have to eat ramen noodles and share a sleeping bag on the floor.
I think the father should have the option to offset his child support payments by purchasing things for the kids, dollar for dollar. So that if the guy wants to he can pay ZERO in child support if he can show that he spent the equivalent on things his kids need.