What's new

Will Hayward replace Davis in the AS game?

He is questionable for the game and listed from day to day. Is he out of the AS game? I hadn't heard that..

https://www.nba.com/2015/news/02/08/anthony-davis-shoulder-sprain-day-to-day-release/index.html?ls=iref:nbahpts

I just saw this also. The AS game is this week, so I was assuming he wouldn't be playing, but maybe he will. They've got a game today, obviously, and on Wednesday, and then the AS events start on Friday. If he can't play, they're going to have to fly someone in last minute, it seems.
 
Do you think Hayward would be an Allstar if the Allstar weekend was in Utah this year? Does anyone think the Allstar game will ever come back to Utah?

The league generally hosts the All Star Game in the most recently constructed or renovated arena. It's the carrot-on-a-stick for owners to upgrade their facilities. So yes, the All Star game will be back in Salt Lake, but likely not until we see the EnergySolutionsDelta CenterArena 2.0.
 
The reason I don't agree with this reasoning is that the All-star selection is by its nature an individual accolade and not a team one. In reality you are punishing great players for the weaknesses of their teams even if they have absolutely nothing to do with those weaknesses. The reason the Jazz is bad has absolutely nothing to do with Hayward. Single players very rarely are able to put a team on their back and get a team over .500. We are talking once in a generation talents - the Lebrons, the Kevin Durants(even though he needed a rising Westbrook to put OKC in playoff contention)...
I agree with your point, but the reality is, team record DOES matter. The MVP award is also an individual award, yet you rarely ever see a star player from a losing team win the award. Hayward's numbers are deserving of All-Star consideration, however, Ellis and Notwitzkis numbers are similar. I think one of those two gets the nod, simply because they're on a winning team.
 
Shouldn't Mike Conley be included in this discussion. Although he scores slightly less per game, his stats are right there with the other guys, and for those arguing that record should be a factor, he plays for the best team.

He is averaging 17.4. 3.3, 5.4 and 1.2 (46%, 41% and 86%)

WAR 3.87
RPM 2.35
PER 20.00
BPM 1.4
VORP 2.1
WS 5.2
TS% .574

Obviously as a Jazz homer I would love to see Gordon added, and I think he deserves it. But I really like the "chip on his shoulder" way Gordon has played since being left off the all star roster was announced. So I wouldn't be heart broken if he was left out this year if the Brow doesn't play.
 
Crazy how deep the West is team and individual talent wise this year.
 
Shouldn't Mike Conley be included in this discussion. Although he scores slightly less per game, his stats are right there with the other guys, and for those arguing that record should be a factor, he plays for the best team.

He is averaging 17.4. 3.3, 5.4 and 1.2 (46%, 41% and 86%)

WAR 3.87
RPM 2.35
PER 20.00
BPM 1.4
VORP 2.1
WS 5.2
TS% .574

Obviously as a Jazz homer I would love to see Gordon added, and I think he deserves it. But I really like the "chip on his shoulder" way Gordon has played since being left off the all star roster was announced. So I wouldn't be heart broken if he was left out this year if the Brow doesn't play.

Yeah, I thought of Conley as well, and he is close to these guys on a very good team. You might even throw, gulp, Randolph into the conversation. Dudes an underrated defender, monster rebounder, and pretty damn good on offense with good numbers.
 
Crazy how deep the West is team and individual talent wise this year.

Dwight Howard isn't even mentioned. Then you have probably 5-8 players after the players already selected who are really good, but not on a superstar level anymore/yet. Thinks Spurs, Grizzlies, Mavericks.
 
I don't have a problem with valuing wins before stats with regard to an event such as this. Fans of basketball should hope that the league tries to incentivize good basketball over gawdy numbers in crap situations. That's not to say that all players that produce on bad teams are themselves undeserving, but the incentive of playing winning basketball needs to win out most of the time regardless.

Hayward shouldn't get in over either of those guys. Demarcus Cousins notwithstanding.
 
considering that there has been no talk whatsoever about Hayward being in the mix would make me think that he's not going to make it. I'm pretty sure Cousins and Lillard were chosen due to being the next on the list from the coaches.

Everyone saw Cousins and Lillard as the two completely obvious snubs.

I don't think that the choice has any bearing on Hayward's selection.

We do not know who was the coaches third-in-line, it could have been Hayward. It would not surprise me. He gets a lot of love from coaches and has a balanced game that coaches love (versus a one- dimensional scoring machine that may be more loved by fans)
 
Because he's played better than them this year would be the conventional answer. The only reason they should pick those two over Hayward is team record or lifetime achievement considerations. I don't think Duncan deserved to be an AS this year, but his lifetime greatness prevailed etc.

In the last couple of weeks, Hayward has definitely been playing the best of the three.
 
Back
Top