What's new

Will You Accept the Findings of the Muller Probe?

Will You Accept the Findings of the Muller Probe?


  • Total voters
    29
Hey did you hear that Hillary’s long time personal lawyer is going to jail for 3 years for stuff he did at HRC’s behest?


I may have those facts slightly wrong.
 
Here is what CNN and the left wont tell you about the Muller Investigation.

Thank god for people are honest and still have a spine

 
How long do you think the Democrats can keep spinning this? How big of a hole do you think they will dig themselves?

The Democrats need 2020 to come sooner rather than later. This is is getting bad. They dont know when to stop and have completely forgotten that their charade is on full blast right now. Ive never in my 81 years seen a political party make bigger fools of themselves.
 
Yeah, I don't think there was anything "illegal" about her private servers. She certainly wasn't indicted for anything. I'm just saying it gave a scandal additional legs, and made people think it was a bigger deal than it really was.

Why are we still debating this? It’s not like Obama blocked the investigator from holding a press conference disclosing his findings.

My hell people. It’s like some of you turned off your brains a long time ago and are stuck on Hillary doing illegal things, facts be damned.



https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/p...-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.

In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.

@LogGrad98 either stop producing misinformation intentionally or admit to your clear bias, facts be damned. Clinton did nothing illegal with regards to her email server.

Which is a little bit different than Trump, where we have 450+ prosecutors who believe he would’ve been indicted had he not been president. She didn’t obstruct justice, unlike Trump, who even today is attempting to block Mueller from testifying and prevent he release of his taxes. She didn’t abuse power, unlike Trump, who is abusing his power to impede multiple investigations from the House.

Trumpers, we all know you don’t care about facts.

But the rest of you? time to wake up! Get your facts. It’s honestly not that hard. It took me less than 2 mins to look up Comey’s (a republican) press conference and read his report.
 
How do you figure CNN is not left leaning? If that were true, doesnt it make it odd then that stadiums full of Republicans chant "CNN sucks"?

No, because I understand the difference between propaganda and reality.

Somewhere you read that CNN is sensationalism, and havent even bothered to be objective about it.

I "read" that by looking at the CNN headlines and choices for news stories.

You are too scared to go against the grain of your mad liberal party because you know you will be attacked and ostracized by your supposed own pepes.

I guess you weren't on this board 10 years ago. I was saying stuff (mostly what I say today) and no one liked it.
 
Have you seen the ads that the Russians ran on facebook? I'll comfortably state that they had no bearing on the outcome of the election.

My point exactly.

If that were possible, literally thousands of other entities would have attempted the same with more resources.

They do. It's called "advertising", and people spend money on it because it works.
 
Just imagine that they had hired an international actor to inject Russian-fed propaganda into the FBI as a pretext for spying on a campaign. Oh wait, we don't have to imagine it, because that happened.

Really? You can't be talking about the Steele report, so to what are you referring?
 
If African American voting rates had stayed the same during the general as previous elections Hillary would’ve won. I’ve also read (but cannot find the link) to black turnout declining between the Democratic Party and general election.

Without a black person on the ticket, a black voting rate drop was inevitable.
 
And yet, not one of these people were hired to do Mueller's job. His conclusions are the only ones that matter. He punted. These people do not matter at all.
actually i think it was muellers job to run an investigation which he did and it came up with many instances where a normal civilian would have been charged. Unfortunately Trump is not a normal civilian and i dont think muellers job is to indict, charge, or convict trump. Just to provide info to some dude named Barr.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I don't think there was anything "illegal" about her private servers. She certainly wasn't indicted for anything. I'm just saying it gave a scandal additional legs, and made people think it was a bigger deal than it really was.
Well her illegality is pretty similar to Trump's. You now, can't exactly prove enough to indict. But I guess for you that mean turn the blind eye for Hillary.

By the way, using private email servers was a very very very very gray area. Hard to distinguish from Black.
 
Back
Top