What's new

Will You Accept the Findings of the Muller Probe?

Will You Accept the Findings of the Muller Probe?


  • Total voters
    29
Hello bubble heads. What world do you live in?

Hillary's reasons for using a private server..... on official SD business.... was to evade the FOIA law. It is illegal to do that. A crime. A serious crime. We may not ever know what all she was doing that was illegal.

It is also illegal to turn over such a server to a private company for any reason.

We know that the Chinese were being "served" information from that computer.

We know that a lot of top Washington politicos..... Corrupt Joe Biden and his son Hunter, Corrupt Mitch McConnel and his wife Elaine, and Bill and Hillary, and Sen Feinstein and Nancy Pelosi, even Harry Reid and Jon Huntsman, had all been involved in corrupt deals with the Chinese, which undermine our economy and technological position strategically.

It is simply "The Chinese Way" to smooze their way ahead in life, lie and cheat. We know the Chinese have "bought in" on our social media giants and are influencing their policies undermining freedom of speech, freedom of association.... on the so-call "private" monopolistic medias that have profound and corrupting influence on our elections.

The Russians are small-time in all this sort of thing.... but they paid Hillary and Bill millions for advantageous decisions for them. Then they were miffed when Western (George Soros and Obama) fascists displaced the Russian-compliant Ukrainian Honchos, despite the "help" of some other Western interests aka Paul Manifort. Putin was so miffed he launched his military to "re-take" his warm-water base in the Crimea.

The whole hoax over Trump's utter uninvolvement in international intrigue has been run as a tactic to misdirect public attention. We are now tired of all this stuff, and we won't investigate Hillary because Trump believes it is just divisive and counter-productive. He wants to build stuff. Infrastructure, walls.....

The Chinese have tried to smooze Trump too, and are having a hard time shifting to direct fair dealings with us.
 
How do you figure CNN is not left leaning? If that were true, doesnt it make it odd then that stadiums full of Republicans chant "CNN sucks"?
Are they all just a bunch of Republicans mad about sensationalism?

Cmon man? Really? This is why we cant find common ground. We cant even get on the same page with just some simple truths. Somewhere you read that CNN is sensationalism, and havent even bothered to be objective about it. This is where liberals have their faults. You are too scared to go against the grain of your mad liberal party because you know you will be attacked and ostracized by your supposed own pepes. You live in fear. You dont objectively look at things. The leftists are trying to bully the **** out of people now, and its working on a lot of people. Its this self feeding monster. You bully each other into not daring go against your own propaganda. This is why you are unable to change your mind on something.
You don't understand English. If you want to be an American, learn English.
 
Trump won. Now move on please. Stop projecting.
Kids, the word of the day is "projecting." NPC learned what that word meant this week and he is enamored by it, so he's going to be finding ways to use it in almost every post on jazzfanz. So again, children, please remember, the word of the day is "projecting" so if you hear someone use that word (90% chance it's gonna be NPC this week) throw your hands in the air and go crazy so that we all know you remembered what the word of the day was.

tenor.gif
 
A promise by Trump not to continue in a cycle of endless wars, yet, if elected to a second term, I would fully expect a war against Iran. I believe both Bolton and Pompeo feel this is inevitable, and will continue to act to undermine Iranian leaders. Having the far right in control in Israel at this time does not help, IMHO.

Well, any open conflict with Iran would deserve its own thread, but since I called this in this thread, and since authoritarians sometimes rally support, as well as deflect attention from domestic problems, through conflicts abroad, might as well point out this little news item:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/05/politics/iran-carrier-bomber-task-force/index.html

"In a written statement released by the White House, Bolton said the US was deploying the USS Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group and a bomber task force to the US Central Command region in the Middle East "to send a clear and unmistakable message to the Iranian regime that any attack on United States interests or on those of our allies will be met with unrelenting force."

"We will hold the Iranians accountable for attacks on American interests. And the fact that ... if those actions take place, if they do by some third-party proxy, a Shiite militia group, the Houthis or Hezbollah, we will hold the Iranian leadership directly accountable for that," said Pompeo.

https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion...0190506-hujcpw2tcvenrdwjjtnqdcm6a4-story.html
 
Kids, the word of the day is "projecting." NPC learned what that word meant this week and he is enamored by it, so he's going to be finding ways to use it in almost every post on jazzfanz. So again, children, please remember, the word of the day is "projecting" so if you hear someone use that word (90% chance it's gonna be NPC this week) throw your hands in the air and go crazy so that we all know you remembered what the word of the day was.

tenor.gif


Projecting isn't about cartoons, bro.

It's about how you see the world in terms of your own ideas.

CNN is about cartoons, not the reality ordinary people believe. Loony toons.
 
Projecting isn't about cartoons, bro.

It's about how you see the world in terms of your own ideas.

CNN is about cartoons, not the reality ordinary people believe. Loony toons.

Not quite. We are talking about psychological projection. Wikipedia has a decent definition: "Psychological projection is a defense mechanism in which the human ego defends itself against unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others. For example, a person who is habitually rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude. It incorporates blame shifting."
 
Kids, the word of the day is "projecting." NPC learned what that word meant this week and he is enamored by it, so he's going to be finding ways to use it in almost every post on jazzfanz. So again, children, please remember, the word of the day is "projecting" so if you hear someone use that word (90% chance it's gonna be NPC this week) throw your hands in the air and go crazy so that we all know you remembered what the word of the day was.

Spot on. I think I'm the one who brought it up. So for NPC, I have new words to study: "auto erotic asphyxiation." Please study, practice, and report back.
 
Hello bubble heads. What world do you live in?

Hillary's reasons for using a private server..... on official SD business.... was to evade the FOIA law. It is illegal to do that. A crime..

What evidence do you have that this was her reason? Because I'm sure you could prove it in a court of law.

You do realize that Trump's using unsecured smart phone puts our security at much higher risk than anythin HRC did. So let's not pretend the email outrage is about anything more than politics.

And, by the way, I am pissed at HRC for what she did. But the way it has been portrayed and politically played is just dumb.
 
Last edited:
Well, any open conflict with Iran would deserve its own thread, but since I called this in this thread, and since authoritarians sometimes rally support, as well as deflect attention from domestic problems, through conflicts abroad, might as well point out this little news item:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/05/politics/iran-carrier-bomber-task-force/index.html

"In a written statement released by the White House, Bolton said the US was deploying the USS Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group and a bomber task force to the US Central Command region in the Middle East "to send a clear and unmistakable message to the Iranian regime that any attack on United States interests or on those of our allies will be met with unrelenting force."

"We will hold the Iranians accountable for attacks on American interests. And the fact that ... if those actions take place, if they do by some third-party proxy, a Shiite militia group, the Houthis or Hezbollah, we will hold the Iranian leadership directly accountable for that," said Pompeo.

https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion...0190506-hujcpw2tcvenrdwjjtnqdcm6a4-story.html

Red, Iran has been there a long time.

Most Iranians don't like their government, and call it "authoritarian". And their country "Persia" and their language "Persian". It is impossibly diverse, and has not had a government that was not "authoritarian" in all it's history. But a huge majority want "democracy", and would be willing to join a revolution to achieve it.

The Iranian government has support from Russia and China, and Cuba and North Korea. With Venezuela, it is the "playground" of world interests seeking to build a new oil cartel to counter the BP/Shell/Standard Oil kingdom that has Saudia allegiance.

Fair enough to say we've fought wars over oil for a long time.

The great movers and shakers of the world, aka CFR/UN Rockefeller assets, have been scheming for a great mid-East War, sometimes referred to as WWIII, ever since the VietNam war wound down. Well, since WWII.

I worry about Trumps little circle of generals. Not so different from Obamas. Not so different from those who would have been Hillary's little circle. Lots of "MIC" influence there.

Obama actually was building up Iran.... well, trying to outdo the Russians and Chinese in supporting the Iranian authoritarian government. But Obama as well as Hillary had no intention of preventing the grand war their generals were planning.

If we don't get that war going during Trumps administration, it will only be because nobody owns Trump so securely they can be confident of the outcome of that grand war.
 
Back
Top