I've never been a big Tucker fan and thought he was purely a product of environment. That said, even with him aging, I think the value he could bring is being a hustle guy and doing some dirty work, while being respected in the corner. He's a body you can throw at the bigger wings for a few minutes to change things up. I'd definitely take him if he were bought out. Wouldn't trade for him because you'd have to do like a 5 for 1.The love affair around the league with Tucker makes no sense to me. The guy looks toast to me. He isn't nearly the defender he used to be and his offense looks horrible this year. That is with Wall finding him a bunch of clean looks.
He’s also one of those guys that is allowed to get away with murder for some reason... CP3, Beverly, are some of the others. They get more ripe with the refs because of their reputation.I've never been a big Tucker fan and thought he was purely a product of environment. That said, even with him aging, I think the value he could bring is being a hustle guy and doing some dirty work, while being respected in the corner. He's a body you can throw at the bigger wings for a few minutes to change things up. I'd definitely take him if he were bought out. Wouldn't trade for him because you'd have to do like a 5 for 1.
Brantley, to me, doesn't look like he has improved from last year. Looks like he has a low-basketball IQ.I'd give Brantley some minutes at the 4 and see if he doesn't completely screw things up. He's played a year in the G-league already. Throw him out on the floor and see what he can do. He's built like Millsap.
A lot of 1-5 year players appear that way to me too. I think it might be because the game is evolving and changing so fast, that they have a hard time adapting. And being able to adapt is what's separating the leaders from the pack.Brantley, to me, doesn't look like he has improved from last year. Looks like he has a low-basketball IQ.
A lot of 1-5 year players appear that way to me too. I think it might be because the game is evolving and changing so fast, that they have a hard time adapting. And being able to adapt is what's separating the leaders from the pack.
The things Brantley did in college, backing people down and playing bully ball in the paint, don't translate to the NBA. But what he can do is make defensive rotations, use his wide body to stay in front of guys, move the ball on offense and rebound. The thing that holds him back is his 3pt shooting, which is in the low 30s. If he can get that up, he can be rotational.
PJ Tucker looks washed, and he's shooting around 31% from 3pt this year. The Jazz should be able to take a few games and experiment a little with their rotations. Last year, the Jazz make a point to play Rayjon Tucker 10 mins for several games. I think they should do the same with Brantley. I think what's holding him back is the 3pt shooting. The Jazz just make it a huge priority.