Honestly? I don't want him to go. . . but it seems like fait accompli at this point.Even with this flurry of what ifs, I'd still have enjoyed having DM stay and play here. The thing is, where there's smoke, there's fire. Where there's a wall of smoke and orange lights flickering on the horizon off the mountains... there is definitely a forest fire.
I'm having a hard time seeing a scenario where DM stays now after all of this. I'm 99% on this. It's funny to see the Nets back track and say they would be happy to have KD and Kyrie stick around. Yea, right.
3 years and 120M is the risk... as well as a shadow that hangs over the team if it goes poorly.The more I think about it, the more I think Ben is just perfect for where we’re at. He’s a risk…but what is the opportunity cost here? Barrett? Herro? Ben has true star potential. I like getting something more tangible than just picks, and even though he might not want to play basketball again, he has more star potential/equity than a host of picks or either of those players.
If you’re worried about Ben winning you too many games, I’d say that is the least of my worries because he’s been more than happy to sit and Barrett/Herro on their second contracts have just as much potential to middle us out without having the same upside.
I like the Ben Simmons thing. Better premium asset, and potentially better/more picks. The Suns are a great team to deal with if you want picks because they outwardly do not value them, and the bottom could always fall out with Sarver.
Knicks GOTTA jump on this. This is their chance to turn the fans and the public perception around. I don't think the Knicks get out bid.
I am more excited for this Jazz team now than i have been in the past 2 years.
Tbh, when we traded Gobert and postured about keeping DM I was depressed AF. I couldn’t even post.Following this and other threads the past few days has been incredibly refreshing compared to what it was prior to that.
I wonder what changed.
Worst case scenario, the rebuild gets delayed a year. The Hardy hiring, jettisoning Paschall and Forest, trading Royce for no players, and trading Gobert for the Wolves' worst matching salary happened in the span of like 2 days and made it very clear that the Jazz are steering the ship towards a rebuild. It's almost laughable people have thought the Jazz's goal is to really build around Donovan.Tbh, when we traded Gobert and postured about keeping DM I was depressed AF. I couldn’t even post.
Worst case scenario, the rebuild gets delayed a year. The Hardy hiring, jettisoning Paschall and Forest, trading Royce for no players, and trading Gobert for the Wolves' worst matching salary happened in the span of like 2 days and made it very clear that the Jazz are steering the ship towards a rebuild. It's almost laughable people have thought the Jazz's goal is to really build around Donovan.
So, fear not.
Would you guys rather have Simmons or Ayton? I feel like either of these two are better bets than Barrett or Herro if I'm being honest.
I'd also love to get those juicy Lakers picks if Kyrie is dealt.
I think we’d definitely rebuild, but if we kept him for another season it just felt dirty. I was definitely out on investing any time into the team. The first time I’d felt that way in probably forever.Worst case scenario, the rebuild gets delayed a year. The Hardy hiring, jettisoning Paschall and Forest, trading Royce for no players, and trading Gobert for the Wolves' worst matching salary happened in the span of like 2 days and made it very clear that the Jazz are steering the ship towards a rebuild. It's almost laughable people have thought the Jazz's goal is to really build around Donovan.
So, fear not.