What's new

Worldwide Genocide Continues: 13,867 DEAD from COVID-19 Shots

Fortunately, the standard for "credible" is different from "babe believes it".

credulity is cultivated as a vital necessity by all authoritarians, who reflexively reward it with honor and badges. It is so important to state interests, in fact, that no state can sustain itself without a critical mass of adherents.

Most organizations will inexorably cull out any members who fail to display it with sufficient enthusiasm.

In the course of time, this is the reason nations and all other human organizations fail. Building societies on fantasies has no permanent value.

You sit on a little pile of stones prepared for you by your masters and are happy to entertain the occasional passersby who mock you for your position, and you gleefully throw the stones after them, mistaking the fact that the mockers pass on by for some damn kind of success in life.
You are linking to a report on the NIH server, while simultaneously claiming it is being suppressed in the US. Do you truly have no sense of irony?


Those sources include the Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) run by the WHO. Do you trust the WHO? Because, they say that "Adverse event following immunization ... does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the usage of the vaccine. If not rapidly and effectively dealt with, can undermine confidence in a vaccine and ultimately have dramatic consequences for immunization coverage and disease incidence." and "Epidemiological studies are usually needed to assess the causal relationship between the vaccine and the signal.". You didn't link to such a study. If you don't trust the WHO, why are you relying on the reports in the AEFI that they run?


However, in the study you did link to, we should not the authors Results:


Your quote-mining and cherry-picking minor points out of the study and out-of-context is, at best, a thunderously inept thinking.


Because viewing it the way the authors intended doesn't fit with your pre-conceived notions? You're just wrong.


Incorrect. The report is quite illuminating. Your discussion of it is completely wrong, but the report itself is pretty good.


You are welcome to your paranoia.


Nothing in your self-description (a lab monkey who worked with chemists) comes across as a scientist in the field of public health. As a data monkey who actually works with public health scientists, among others, I'm at least as qualified as you.


You are welcome to your delusions.

The report I cited paid all the necessary points of homage to the agenda of sustained pandemic authoritarianism. It involved no original study only analysis of other studies. It appeared useful to me as something that in fact discredited your claim that no deaths had occurred as a consequence to, as events caused by, administration of vaccines to patients.

Almost all studies officially accepted and published in "major" or "accepted" journals have to avoid or overcome the criticism of "disinformation" in today's scientific climate.

We have major news retailers who openly profess today that material which is not helpful to the cause of greater good aka global socialism should not be published, and that is the fundamental thesis underlying all political labeling by those in favor of this "Greater Good"

However, even in this kind of suppression, even the advocates of that suppression, appear in this case to be forced to acknowledge the problem of causality linked to the Covid vaccines.

I saw a pretty good effort to provide "answers" in this study to the problem you don't see/won't admit.
.
 
credulity is cultivated as a vital necessity by all authoritarians, who reflexively reward it with honor and badges. It is so important to state interests, in fact, that no state can sustain itself without a critical mass of adherents.
Since I'm being lectured to on credulity by a guy who see the Rothschilds everywhere, there's little to do but laugh or sigh.

It appeared useful to me as something that in fact discredited your claim that no deaths had occurred as a consequence to, as events caused by, administration of vaccines to patients.
I said no deaths in the US of one particular putative complication. Nothing in your link said otherwise. The source data it quotes specifically warns against assuming causation.

Almost all studies officially accepted and published in "major" or "accepted" journals have to avoid or overcome the criticism of "disinformation" in today's scientific climate.
Yes, it is very helpful to build on what we already know, as opposed to pie-in-the-sky nonsense.
 
Since I'm being lectured to on credulity by a guy who see the Rothschilds everywhere, there's little to do but laugh or sigh.


I said no deaths in the US of one particular putative complication. Nothing in your link said otherwise. The source data it quotes specifically warns against assuming causation.


Yes, it is very helpful to build on what we already know, as opposed to pie-in-the-sky nonsense.
Sophistry is often a sort of lie. So are personal attacks of any kind.

I don't know anything about the old line banking families. A lot of people say stuff with no real knowledge. I have heard of Venice being once a banking center, I have heard alusions to Popes related to bankers, and I have heard of the City of London,. Some of the American banking dynasties appear to be influential. The allegations generally run more in the line of politcians going to get money to fight wars, and the bankers loan it out. Then there's "our" Federal Resserve, which I actually know next to nothing about.

Still, it is almost certainly true that people of influence have money, or access to money, and common folk are often cut out of the deals.

You allege that I lack good judgment somehow because you imagine I am overly interested in speculattive connections. The common lie/slander that someone is a conspiracy theorist is a tool got up by the CIA in the early 1950s ir oergaos earkuerm when some of the higher echelons of our government were importing former NAZI or German or otherwise highly talented Europeans to bolster our military programs.



The reason this was a necessary tool is just because following the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, some of our industrial giants went looking for a base offshore where they could build their production and ship it where they wanted. The Rockefellers had some pharmaceutical operations in Germany, and some investment in basic industries like chemical plants, oil companies. IG Farben comes to mind, a producer of chlorine gas. And some high tech metals. The Fords invested in auto manufacture as well. I think there are practically no American industrialists who did not build in Germany in the 1930s.

Our elites of this sort were very concerned about the ideas people might get about their involvement and profits from German war production. But wasn't just us, some of our "Allies" were invoved as well.

We created a spy unit during the war that utilized talent from these "German" production outfits, and called it the OSS. After the war, we wanted more of that talent, and wanted a fresh name Americans could accept as a civilian government operation, so the called it the CIA.

Whenever I run across an ignoramus who knows nothing of this sort of thing, I read it out as "Here's a clown trying to impress the cows." Now I confess I talk to cows myself, and they talk back. I can sorta tell if they're gonna stampede from the way it sounds, but I'm can't been sure there are any cow vocabulary items I could write out and give definitions for.

I am not a political activist except in the sense that I despise and hate almost all politicians, all except those who listen to me. So perhaps there are an inconsequential number of exceptions.

What I believe about politics is to be found, largely, in Ambrose Bierce's ""Devils' Dictionary"

As I think I've intimated before perfaps too many times already, human liberty is universally degraded by every alderman, councilman, mayor, or government official, and by every political activist like you.

I have not the time to howl down every do-gooder or self-righteous proponent of governance. You'd have to show me someone who did something without some special regard for some interested and influential sjupporter before you could convince me that there is such a thing as open government in the public interest.

Until you can do that, your sneering insults about supposed ignoramuses are more like four fingers pointed to yourself for every one pointing at others.
 
Since I'm being lectured to on credulity by a guy who see the Rothschilds everywhere, there's little to do but laugh or sigh.


I said no deaths in the US of one particular putative complication. Nothing in your link said otherwise. The source data it quotes specifically warns against assuming causation.


Yes, it is very helpful to build on what we already know, as opposed to pie-in-the-sky nonsense.

You apparently missed, or disregarded, the obvious bias in the linked article. The main thrust in fact was to provide suggestions, without evidence, for all kinds of non-causal possibiliies. A sort of tutorial, if not an outright users' guide, for ascribing other reasons for deaths that the vaccines.

My point in providing the link was to show the actual admissions that a variety of deaths seem somehow related to the vaccination, because of a fairly short amount of lapsed time when the deaths occurred, after a vaccination.

"
  • 9. Mortality after COVID-19 vaccination: More concerningly have been emerging reports of deaths following the various available COVID-19 vaccines. A Norwegian expert group has noted mortality in frail patients vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and advocate a risk-benefit analysis in this cohort of patients [29]. There have been multiple other reasons attributed to deaths with these vaccines including fatal anaphylaxis and a paradoxical syndrome of blood clots and thrombocytopenia (VITT) [14,15]. VITT has been predominantly noticed following the first dose of the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine and this has led to change in vaccine strategy with the CDC panel including various national governments advocating avoiding Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in specific age groups and women [30]."

We don't have a comparable report from US sources exclusively, most of the references in this article come from India. Pretty sure we could do one if our establishment authorities cared for it. So you do perhaps have the point on your clever exclusion of reports outside the US.


Sometimes you seem obsessively biased.

Are you being graded or paid somehow, for maintaining the party line in this forum? Never seen you get very interested in acknowledging points not beneficial to the agenda.
 
Last edited:
Our pharma giants show up as big advertisers in all our mainstream journals, and in grants to department chairs in our great universities. It could hardly be expected that our professionals in these institutions would really rush to the task to discredit their benefactors in any fashion.

At the very least, this fact or circumstances alone should dissuade individuals conversing socially regarding such products from unthinking belief in official assertions. And we should respect and maybe even consider people's experiences with those products, be they medicines or any kind of treatments. The FDA ,moreover, has such a critical mass of connections and relations to the industries regulated, we really should have an independent oversight from third parties on all their worki. Goes for NIH and CDC too.

Just too much good reason to question their work.

Until and Unless we actually take the time, make the efforrt, to evaluate the many anecdotal complaints, we are not really being very reliable reporters on these subjects.
 
Credibility grows out of thorough evaluation of diverse opinions and actually looking for objections to the assertions we make.

Credulity grows out of relying on official or authoritative or whatever report at hand, without questioning it.

Political activism actually requires the exercise of massive credulity in forcing unwanted ideas off the page.
 
I'm looking forward to getting my booster.

Is that the one that will kill me and/or implant a chip in me and/or make my dick fall off or whatever is supposed to happen?
 
Sophistry is often a sort of lie. So are personal attacks of any kind.
You mean, personal attacks like saying "You are handed daily talking points and supporting references, I believe."?

Still, it is almost certainly true that people of influence have money, or access to money, and common folk are often cut out of the deals.
There we agree.

As I think I've intimated before perfaps too many times already, human liberty is universally degraded by every alderman, councilman, mayor, or government official, and by every political activist like you.
I have discussions on message boards. That is not being an activist.

You'd have to show me someone who did something without some special regard for some interested and influential sjupporter before you could convince me that there is such a thing as open government in the public interest.
Just because I don't buy into your conspiratorial nonsense does not mean that I think we have an open government.

My point in providing the link was to show the actual admissions that a variety of deaths seem somehow related to the vaccination, because of a fairly short amount of lapsed time when the deaths occurred, after a vaccination.
Except, it is not an admission. That is a confusions of correlation and causation. Hundreds of people found out they had cancer after watching the last season of Game of Thrones, that does not mean the show caused cancer.

We don't have a comparable report from US sources exclusively,.
We do. It's called VAERS.

Sometimes you seem obsessively biased.
Possibly. I am only human.

Are you being graded or paid somehow, for maintaining the party line in this forum?
Nope. I do this to satisfy my own neuroses.

Never seen you get very interested in acknowledging points not beneficial to the agenda.
Perhaps you just blow by the points that I agree with you upon.
Our pharma giants show up as big advertisers in all our mainstream journals, and in grants to department chairs in our great universities. It could hardly be expected that our professionals in these institutions would really rush to the task to discredit their benefactors in any fashion.
I agree this is major issue.

At the very least, this fact or circumstances alone should dissuade individuals conversing socially regarding such products from unthinking belief in official assertions. And we should respect and maybe even consider people's experiences with those products, be they medicines or any kind of treatments. The FDA ,moreover, has such a critical mass of connections and relations to the industries regulated, we really should have an independent oversight from third parties on all their worki. Goes for NIH and CDC too.
Any such third parties would also be lobbied and courted by the pharmaceuticals, and we would have added a layer of bureaucracy with little or no benefit.

Until and Unless we actually take the time, make the efforrt, to evaluate the many anecdotal complaints, we are not really being very reliable reporters on these subjects.
They actually do that. Try making a report on VAERS; you will likely get contacted for the details of the report.
 
Here's some of the latest info I've come across.

It seems the vaccine is causing a lot of deaths and injuries but the mainstream media aren't reporting it.

How many people are the Covid-19 Vaccines killing?​


150,000 American deaths from the Covid vaccine?

THE VACCINE DEATH REPORT


Listen to what this nurse says.

ICU NURSE: "You're being lied to about COVID."​






Doctors who analyze the vaccine have been finding some strange stuff.

Dr. Carrie Madej Reveals Tentacled Self-Aware Organism (Also Self-Assembling Nanobots & Nanolipids) in Moderna, Johnson & Johnson Vaccine Vials, Possibly Connected to Hydra Vulgaris “Model Organism” and Human Genome Project​

 
She doesn't give full verifiable identifying info about who she is and why she's an expert. She's a nurse that has been working in the ICU and we get her first name. Not even a list of credentials, which would be standard for a medical professional. She doesn't contain her video to things that she has specific expertise in. I wouldn't even trust a doctor that worked directly along side her to speak on the wide range of issues she addresses. Yet she speaks to this very wide range of issues with confidence and authority, the kind of confidence and authority I typically only see in liars, cheats and those suffering from a severe case of Dunning-Kruger.

13:12 She lies. It is well known that sedentary people who are obese, have diabetes, hypertension, all that **** she says are MAJOR risk factors that greatly increase the chances that you will become seriously ill or die.

So just like in a court of law. I see that and I'm done. She's not credible. She says things that are EASILY disproven as though it is a fact. I have zero doubts that she does that throughout. As with most of these videos I listened to her introduce herself then skipped to a random spot to see what she is saying. Turns out I with my incredible luck, jumped right to a part where she is telling a blatant lie.

Makes my job easier because now I don't have to watch the entire 50min of this obvious trash.

But you tossed in the bonus laughs with a headline that claims they are finding self replicating nanobots in the vaccine. I mean, kudos. That's some of the funniest **** I've read in a while.

What kind of dumb MFers do you expect to reel in with this low grade horse ****?
 
13:12 She lies. It is well known that sedentary people who are obese, have diabetes, hypertension, all that **** she says are MAJOR risk factors that greatly increase the chances that you will become seriously ill or die.
Do you mean when she says that over seventy eight percent of covid patients are obese? I talked to someone who knew a nurse who worked in a hospital who said the same thing. I have no medical background but I can listen to what doctors explain in videos. One doctor explained that body fat absorbs all the vitamin D from where it's needed and that's why obese people who get covid have a higher death rate than people with covid who aren't obese. There's a doctor named Lee Merritt who said in a video that only one country did a study to see why some elderly people infected with covid recovered and some died. She said it was Indonesia – I forgot which video it was as I've seen several of hers; it was one of her earlier ones. Their findings were that the patients that died all had low vitamin D levels.


Here's another good video.

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi Warns: COVID Shots to “Decimate World Population”​



Here are some more links to it as it may get censored.
 
Last edited:
You mean, personal attacks like saying "You are handed daily talking points and supporting references, I believe."?


There we agree.


I have discussions on message boards. That is not being an activist.


Just because I don't buy into your conspiratorial nonsense does not mean that I think we have an open government.


Except, it is not an admission. That is a confusions of correlation and causation. Hundreds of people found out they had cancer after watching the last season of Game of Thrones, that does not mean the show caused cancer.


We do. It's called VAERS.


Possibly. I am only human.


Nope. I do this to satisfy my own neuroses.


Perhaps you just blow by the points that I agree with you upon.

I agree this is major issue.


Any such third parties would also be lobbied and courted by the pharmaceuticals, and we would have added a layer of bureaucracy with little or no benefit.


They actually do that. Try making a report on VAERS; you will likely get contacted for the details of the report.

I don't know that much about VAERS. I did go to their site and browse around.

On one talk show the other night, a lady calling in wanted to tell the world that five of her vaccinated friends had since gotten cancer, and these cancers went to stage IV within two months. She asserted positively that there was a specific carcinogen in the vaccine and wanted to warn the world that no one should get the vaccine if they didn't want to just die inside six months. I don't think she would trust VAERS or even any medical professional with her secret knowledge. Sometimes Bill Gates and Dr,. Fauci are the topic as world pandemic engineers.

So here is what I see. In Oct. some liberal news chatterers on some mainstream channel personality feature brought up the subject of pandemic. I remember some of the H1N1 events, I got this one myself. I went to work in my lab with it's usual chlorine load, about ten times OSHA specifications, but what the hell. It's midnight in the desert, right? sixty miles from town. At 5pm the plant shuts down their pretenses of compliance and run full bore, and the desert fifteen miles around become inhospitable for rabbits, crows and rattlesnakes. And H1N1.

In 1983-2-3 I was reading some immunology newsletter. Three New England immunologists had suddenly passed. It was a huge loss to the profession. No one knew why. No one tried to explain why. A hot topic for research in those days was biochemical warfare. My brother, an officer in the military specializing in that area, suddenly died. Some heart condition. He came home from work, asked his wife to run to the store to get some cold medicine, and just died inside five minutes. His doctor told all his siblings get tested for a rare heart condition, a funny valve or some damn thing. OK, so that was probably his heart. Years later, another brother went to that doctor and challenged the medical work and was shown an image of the heart. It was just an enlarged rheumatic fever case. My brother had been a mile runner getting prizes in college competition....... . So anyway, of four scientists working with a variety of corona virus designed for military deployment, I believe one of the four died of something else. But hey, coincidence is coincidence. For all we know, causative coincidence. Meaning we really know nothing.

The delightful thing about Corona virus as a military weapon is that you can deploy it, let the enemy suffer and die maybe, or evacuate the area. And then you can just kill the virus with a good dose of chlorine gas, and march on in.

In March of 2020, Dr. John Trump has some of his lab rats test corona virus inside a steel "bomb" with various levels of gases, including chlorine and ozone and alcohol. It was on the news. These gases destroyed corona virus at low levels on cleaning concentration. Probably, ordinary smog or highway levels of exhaust fumes kill corona virus too. Nobody applied this knowledge in any way....... no mandates for ozone generators inside public spaces, or chlorinators that would cleanse the office with swimming pool sorts chlorine smells.

No question, authorities knew all this. New York City could have been fumigated with a day or two of OSHA-safe chlorine levels, and the Covid would have just stopped dead.

So I have a choice of what to believe.

Incompetent guvmint officials, or a played out unnecessary possibly planned pandemic designed to enhance authoritarian population management.

What the hell.

Who says it can't be both.

Dr. John Trump almost killed the whole scheme by stopping travel from Wuhan to the US. Pandemic pushers had to do promotional visits Chinatown in San Francisco and New York, and do a special business conference bringing Chinese spreaders in from Italy. The Wuhan games, where fake sthletic trainer personnel went around dabbing the bleachers with spilled pop concoctions heavily loaded with virus on got a few cases going worldwide before Nov 2019. Even hiding the new virus as ordinary flu in the official stats, there was just a real damned disappointing outcome.

And then those Chinese lab workers spilled the beans. The whole plot was in jeopardy. They had to be quickly disappeared.

It took from October to March to get it going, even with officials forcing crowded conditions on mass transit.

Five million dead though. Half of that coincidental deaths not caused by the virus. And to get that far, We had to make five vaccines that don't really work as vaccines. To be a vaccine, you need to get the T Cell response, not just an antibody titre. And suppress the use of over forty known antiviral treatements that significantly help when applied in a timely and effective manner, and completely ignore monoclonal antibody formulations and survivor blood serum infusions(antibodies) or white cell transfusions.

I mean, if authorities knew of any better way to look suspicious, I'm sure I couldn't imagine how.

But what really marks this whole thing out as a Machiavellian public political operation is the crazy anti-vaxxers who wanna march in the streets. Gotta be commie cells operating those things.

Yah just can't manipulate politics without both hands, left and right.

Still, whoever engineered this operation failed. Really. FAILED.

Not gonna be no damn socialist America. In fact, the whole Progressive ball of yarns is coming unraveled. Some damn cat got it and won't quit until it's all ruined. America is sick of it.

But hey, it's all good. We still got America bankrupted.
 
Last edited:
So here's the scientific medical hierarchy of treatments for a virus.

1. Real vaccination involving an exposure to a live, attenuated virus.

2. Real vaccination involving a killed virus or viral particle.

(The word "Real" in the above involves creating a T Cell response that will keep the person protected for years.)

3. Transfusion or administration of antibody preparations from survivors of the virus. Close in time and space means likely the most effective antibodies possible)

4. Infusion of a prepared monoclonal antibody from a commercial bulk operation.

This was specifically what my job in the immunology lab was all about. I prepared specific antigens, which were then cultivated in lab tissue culture preparations to produce antibodies. I then purified the antibodies to make a true "monoclonal" antibody, which was then tested for effectiveness. In a commercial operation, this can quickly be scaled up to make tons of monoclonal antibodies that work on the live virus.

5. Any kind of method to induce a person to produce their own antibodies to the virus, such as the mRNAs. I am disappointed that all our "vaccines" are related in some manner to this technology. I understand it as an effort to get around side effects from the above methods

Apparently, these antibodies don't really last all that long, and the mRNA is quickly catabolized, so "boosters" will be needed almost every six months.

At that rate, just getting the disease and trying to survive it is almost a better choice.

6. Just prepare an arsenal of antivirals for in case you get the disease. Of course, demand monoclonal antibody administration as well.

If you live, you'll have better immunity than options 2-5 as a result. Not a good idea if you have risk factors.

I see no evidence to sustain any kind of idea that the Covid vaccines have any kind of deliberate intended side effects on the public. There are some adverse reactions to ingredients, differing from vaccine to vaccine. I think overall, the adverse effects are a little higher than usual in vaccines.

In the long run, I think a vaccine from method (1) above will become the standard vaccine for Cov19. People gonna get sore about mandates and boosters.
 
Last edited:
It's pretty clear that they want to kill us.

"It All Makes Sense Once You Realize They Want to Kill Us"


Dr. David Martin: Who “They” Are, “The Names and Faces”
https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2021/11/20/dr-david-martin-who-they-are-the-names-and-faces

Covid Shots Are a “Bioweapon”, a “Pathogenic” Injection​



edit
------------------------------------------------------

STUNNING REPORT: CV19 Injections Will Cause Massive Deaths – Dr. Elizabeth Eads​

 
Last edited:
Just for kicks, what does the federal government of the U.S. and the governments of a least 100 other nations have to gain by killing people with vaccines?

Many of these conspiracies assume the U.S. exists on a planet all by ourselves, so it makes their little story at least kind of internally consistent (but usually not and/or only very loosely). Explain why governments all over the world want to kill their citizens?

And no, I'm not reading links posted by Cosmored. He has a proven track record of posting links to non-legitimate websites. In fact he has a proven track record of exclusively posting links to non-legitimate websites.
 
Just for kicks, what does the federal government of the U.S. and the governments of a least 100 other nations have to gain by killing people with vaccines?

Many of these conspiracies assume the U.S. exists on a planet all by ourselves, so it makes their little story at least kind of internally consistent (but usually not and/or only very loosely). Explain why governments all over the world want to kill their citizens?

And no, I'm not reading links posted by Cosmored. He has a proven track record of posting links to non-legitimate websites. In fact he has a proven track record of exclusively posting links to non-legitimate websites.

One thing i know about politicians. They like money. Where do they get money? Tax payers. How much tax do dead people pay? Ya, they dont want us dead. They like money.


Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Watch the video that I just added to my last post if you're serious truth-seekers. The answers to your questions are there.


edit
----------------------------------------------------------------

This video has some answers...

German Microbiologist: “They are Killing People with these COVID Vaccines” to Reduce the World’s Population

 
Last edited:
Several types of fruit and other non-human things were given the PCR test in Tanzania and they came out positive according to this video.

Former Tanzanian President John Magufuli Exposes The Fraudulent PCR Test For COVID-19
https://www.brighteon.com/122a55ea-4f64-4b89-8567-372f01378e90


This supports the theory that there are lots of false positives.

The WHO Confirms that the Covid-19 PCR Test is Flawed: Estimates of “Positive Cases” are Meaningless. The Lockdown Has No Scientific Basis
https://www.globalresearch.ca/nucle...ain-reaction-pcr-detection-sars-cov-2/5739959


Anyone who had a positive PCR test was considered to be a "case". The high number of cases was used to justify the lockdowns, etc.


(excerpt)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Essentially, Covid19 has long been shown – to those willing to pay attention – to be an entirely created pandemic narrative built on two key factors:

  1. False-positive tests. The unreliable PCR test can be manipulated into reporting a high number of false-positives by altering the cycle threshold (CT value)
  2. Inflated Case-count. The incredibly broad definition of “Covid case”, used all over the world, lists anyone who receives a positive test as a “Covid19 case”, even if they never experienced any symptoms.
Without these two policies, there would never have been an appreciable pandemic at all, and now the CDC has enacted two policy changes which means they no longer apply to vaccinated people.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Here's a bunch of alternative info on the PCR test.
https://wethepundit.com/?s=PCR+test


Protesters demand an end to PCR testing at B.C. rally
https://www.rebelnews.com/protester...t_2_9_21&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel


PCR TEST 'CASEDEMIC': HOW TECHNOCRATS INTENTIONALLY WEAPONIZED BAD SCIENCE
(excerpt)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We now know that PCR tests:

  1. Cannot distinguish between “live” viruses and inactive (noninfectious) viral particles and therefore cannot be used as a diagnostic tool — For this reason, it is grossly misleading to refer to a positive test as a “COVID-19 case.”As explained by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 Doctors for Disaster Preparedness1 lecture, featured in How Medical Technocracy Made the Plandemic Possible,” media and public health officials appear to have purposefully conflated “cases” or positive tests with the actual illness.
    Medically speaking, a “case” refers to a sick person. It never ever referred to someone who had no symptoms of illness.
    Now all of a sudden, this well-established medical term, “case,” has been arbitrarily redefined to mean someone who tested positive for the presence of noninfectious viral RNA. As noted by Merritt, “That is not epidemiology. That’s fraud.”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Here's a good reason to avoid getting the PCR test.

Johns Hopkins: You Can Be Vaccinated With A PCR Test Without Knowing​



Don't get the jab either.

Stew Peters - Dr Jane Ruby - VAXXED Patients' Blood Examined, Horrific Findings Revealed by German Physicians!
https://www.brighteon.com/25c084ab-b7a0-4c89-bfc8-da5b15fe3052

Stew Peters - Dr Jane Ruby - NEVER BEFORE SEEN! "Vaccine" Victims' Bodies IN BATTLE!
https://www.brighteon.com/e47cd33f-b1bc-479b-8008-41b8bca82acf

Stew Peters Interviews Dr Zandre Botha - Never Before Seen: Doctor Reveals Horrific Findings After Examining Vials - Plus Dr Botha Gives Treatment That Has Been Helping Jabbed Victims
https://www.brighteon.com/92dbdbf8-5081-49ce-9588-d2288df6d47b

DR. FRANC ZALEWSKI - THE THING! - ANOTHER 'LIFE FORM' FOUND IN THE COVID VAX VIALS (ENGLISH SUBS)



AUSTRALIAN 'SPIRO INTERVIEWS DR PEGGY A PATHOLOGIST ABOUT THE BIZARRE BLOOD OF VACCINATED PATIENTS



Blood Under a Microscope: Unvaxxed vs Vaxxed
http://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=YUBOUGRU5RNW
 
Last edited:
Top