Would You Trade Favors for Cousins?

[DForceAUS]

I'm not debating the merits of your post.. but please expound on the last 9 words.

No worries mate I meant as a teammate eg: if things go wrong in a game or a season etc, we know how volatile cousins is. favors we know what he's like so its more a personality/ team mate fit than skill- Cousins might have the talent but thats all Id acknowledge.

 

[mhindy]

I think that his bad body language is mostly a factor of playing on **** teams that fire his favorite coach to hire Corbin. Hayward's body language sucked *** last year too.

 

[DForceAUS]

It has nothing to do with off the court. I dont think Cousins is a bad person at all.

It's his on the court attitude that is the problem.

Totally agree thats the blocker to me why we would not trade, on court attitude, how volatile he is, how he would fit in with our other pieces, if things go wrong etc- thats a red flag for me

 

[UGLI baby]

I think that his bad body language is mostly a factor of playing on **** teams that fire his favorite coach to hire Corbin. Hayward's body language sucked *** last year too.

Had same body language at KU.

 

[Dr. Jones]

It has nothing to do with off the court. I dont think Cousins is a bad person at all.

It's his on the court attitude that is the problem.

Much more fair post than I have seen from you re: Cuz. I can take that.

 

[Dr. Jones]

Had same body language at KU.

lol.. he and Collins shook the building on fast breaks.

 

[enchilada_style]

I like players that are rough around the edges like Artest and Rodman but those were complimentary players that wouldn't completely derail your team if they went completely off the deep end. In the case of Cousins you are building your team around this basket case which is risky business. I'd keep Favors and make up for the talent deficit at other positions.

 

[freakazoid]

Ok, let's ask this question a different way: Who would you rather have as a trade asset? I can absolutely relate to fans who say they'd rather have Favors as part of a team going forward, but as an asset, I hope nobody is confused over trade value. Straight up there should be no question, and I'm about as big of a Jazz homer as you might find.

 

[Dr. Jones]

Ok, let's ask this question a different way: Who would you rather have as a trade asset? I can absolutely relate to fans who say they'd rather have Favors as part of a team going forward, but as an asset, I hope nobody is confused over trade value. Straight up there should be no question, and I'm about as big of a Jazz homer as you might find.

#jazzhomo

nice post, btw.

 

[NUMBERICA]

Worth the gamble.

 

[Doublea]

Just my input, a front court of Cousins and Gobert would be the best in the league.

 

[addictionary]

No, for every reason you stated, minus the part about being the biggest bish. The entire Clippers team take rankings 1-12.