What's new

Yesterday - Bundy Ranch

It would be kick *** to here what you know from an inside perspective. I can imagine how frustrating it is to not be able to share everything on a public forum.

I'll try to read that report tomorrow and give feedback, if any.

I just got off the phone from a one hour call with the Bundy's. I am looking into lawyers for them and may take over their communications through Hannity to start.
I'm doing a radio interview tomorrow and may post the podcast here afterward, if I sound sexy.
 
I just got off the phone from a one hour call with the Bundy's. I am looking into lawyers for them and may take over their communications through Hannity to start.
I'm doing a radio interview tomorrow and may post the podcast here afterward, if I sound sexy.

This sounds like good news to me. I've been thinking they need help like that. I've been glad to hear Hannity's coverage of the Bundys. Solid and level-headed.
 
This sounds like good news to me. I've been thinking they need help like that. I've been glad to hear Hannity's coverage of the Bundys. Solid and level-headed.

Hannity and level headed are incongruent.

Disclaimer: I have not listened to anything from hannity in years, so I could be wrong about this current issue.
 
This sounds like good news to me. I've been thinking they need help like that. I've been glad to hear Hannity's coverage of the Bundys. Solid and level-headed.

his coverage, although he's trying, is awful. The Bundy's are bad at it too. Given a chance, I will light **** up. the corruption is UNBELIEVABLE.

Hannity and level headed are incongruent.

Disclaimer: I have not listened to anything from hannity in years, so I could be wrong about this current issue.
Fair.

I'm trying to square things off so I can go to St. George soon.

Please.
 
Hannity and level headed are incongruent.

Disclaimer: I have not listened to anything from hannity in years, so I could be wrong about this current issue.

Well, we all have our differences. Sometimes Hannity aggravates me with his solid mainstream sort of style. . . . in comparison to, say, Michael Savage or Lyndon LaRouche, for example.

In what I've heard, his stance has sounded like "So why do we need to use the high-powered cops, just send a Sheriff out to do the job". "How come we send a force of 200 out into our desert to deal with one man, when we couldn't send anyone in to help our guys in Bengazi?" His argument just sounds like misplaced emphasis, skewed priorities, and he didn't claim to know the details of the legal case or the history on the ground, just saying it should be handled on a lower profile.

And, oh, BTW. . . . it was Bill Cunningham, "The Great American", who was asking a couple of nights ago about why the ninja soldiers on Bundy's case when we apparently don't care if Al Sharpton owes the government three times as much. . . . .
 
@PKM

I note your statement that it doesn't look like some agenda being pushed forward in the Bundy matter. Well, I'm looking at a huge pattern that has been going on across a century. I've seen USDA policy objectives from the fifties. . ..1950s.....promoting corporate ag over family ag, for example.

But I have wondered if the Bundy roundup was not in the class of "black ops" or "false flag" provocation, worried if it was a set-up for some so-called radical supposedly conservative outfit to bust out the guns and start a massacre, or something like that, as a major public "psy-op" ploy to push for a roundup of rednecks, more than any cows. . . . .

Needless to say, we need the facts in regard to the Bundy case. I cannot tell you how much I have cheered for the level-headed character of the folks who were there in support of the Bundys. So glad there was no shooting. . . .

I'm willing to give the BLM as well as the governor of Nevada whatever credit they deserve in that, as well.
 
PKM and Hannity working together?

Wow...

This should be good...

tumblr_mgbqxlZhxj1rmiafjo1_500.gif
 
Back
Top