What's new

Yesterday - Bundy Ranch

I think most here have finally come to understand that I am not defending Bundy, per se.. but more so after Harry Reid and others for using/abusing politics and government offices to do their dirty work in pursuit of self financial gain. It just so happens that people/families are being destroyed, by the hundreds, in their wake.

Anyway, something else we just dug up.

There is a potential new highway, interchange, loop, in planning in Bunkerville. There are a few parcels in key spots for the "50 yard line" commercial valuations. The owner? Reid Bunkerville, LLC. THE owner of that LLC? Yep.

The owner of the sandwiched parcel? Bundy.

Post documents please.
 
Post documents please.

I have these quickly. (Parcel ID's)

REID BUNKERVILLE L L C DST-901*#002-26-301-002

REID BUNKERVILLE L L C DST-800 #002-26-301-004

REID BUNKERVILLE L L C DST-800 #002-26-301-005

REID BUNKERVILLE L L C DST-800 #002-26-701-001
 
you seem to be assuming something here. I had a boss once who said "Never assume anything, because. .. . . at that point he went to blackboard. . . . and wrote the word in a particular way our filter won't permit, and stated emphatically that I was embarrassing him.

I understand all about your concerns for local government being corrupt. Perhaps you haven't realized how corrupt national or global governance is, as well.

That's why I argue for LIMITED government power at all levels, and more respect for personal and human rights, of which the right to hold and use property is but one.

I understand some object to anyone who misuses any property as they may judge that. That's why we have zoning ordinances everywhere where there are neighbors looking over their fences, or insomniacs hearing barking dogs next door.

If you stink much, you are in effect punching others in the nose downwind. Clean air is a defensible personal right.. . . equivalent to the "right to life" in fact. I know folks who I think carry that kind of law too far, too.

Tort law is a good area of legal practice, if you can demonstrate harm caused by another to yourself. Things we accept generally as injurious to people deserve codification. At a local level, which is sometimes best because people half a continent away really don't know what damages western range land, and what does not.

If BY had set the line at 4000 ft, nobody would be living anywhere in Utah except along the Colorado river from Moab on down, or the Virgin River below Zions' canyon. Sometimes exaggeration is fun, sometimes it's just stupid. I think BY was a lot like others I decry as "elitist", handing down ignorant (sometimes) decrees. It would have been better to build on the sides of Great Basin valleys in certain respects. That's where you have the gravels that make a building less subject to amplified earthquake damage. The clays in the center of the valleys will act like jello in any earthquake, and keep on rocking long after the original shock ends. . . .

In very broad terms, leaving more decisions to property owners or more local governments is a way of applying nature's general strategy of diversifying life and spreading risks. One central authority dictating that everyone does the same thing means we'll all go down together if anything ever happens that just isn't anticipated by that one plan.

But even more importantly, the right of an individual to own and use property is, as Blackstone observed in medieval England, equivalent to the "Right to Life". If you can't be secure in your property rights, nothing else can be secure.

Ranchers don't "grab" land beneath rivers. Everybody had a common convention on property lines: the property line is the middle of the river. It's the national government that has grabbed the land under the rivers, and in fact the wetlands adjacent to rivers, and in fact in every draw that is tributary to rivers.

You suppose "local land politics" is "the most easily and deeply corrupted cesspool there is" principally because you're as ignorant of the facts as humanly possible. You don't know anything beyond your personal experience or observation, which in fact you did not bother to research and understand. It's just like in the old song about somebody turning a nice little play spot in the woods and turning it into a parking lot. Sorta says to me somebody grew up trespassing on other people's property and complain about how the owner decided to make it a convenience for the general public needing a good place to shop.

What I do realize is, that mega-planners wanting centralized power under government force today do have ideas about taking away, or reducing, the "property rights" of everyone who owns any property, anywhere. Ever see a bumper sticker that reads "Think Globally. Act Locally" ? That's code for implementing the same plan in every community, a call to arms so to speak for footsoldiers for global management. You were right. The local politics has been corrupted. . .

I'd tell you who these people are, and what philosophy they adhere to, but too many people are complaining about my use of precise terms with accurate meanings that could describe it.

I read a little bit down past your diatribe against my "4000 or whatever" comment and failed to connect any of your 20 random dots. Can you retype this in a more concise, readable way to help me see what your point was?
 
Do we really need to rehash Mormons' animosity towards the federal government and racist views of blacks?

Yes, Bundy's religion explained a lot to me about his outlook and stubbornness. He views himself as an altruistic patriot on a noble mission. In reality, he's a selfish cheap *** who doesn't want to pay his bills. There's a reason why people hate working in restaurants in utah county. Many Mormons are frugal cheap asses. They have large families so they try to save money with using excessive coupons and weak tips. At least once a week a fellow coworker would get a note written on a receipt saying something along the lines of, "10 percent is good enough for The Lord so why should i pay you more?"

In salt lake? Servers average a good 10-15 percent more on tips. That's literally $50-150 bucks more per day.

Every day I worked in the restaurant business in utah county we had folks thing to combine several coupons (even though they specifically state you cannot). When I worked up in salt lake? Never once did someone try to pull one on me by combining coupons.

I don't know what it's like in a "big city" like salt lake, but here in utah county people still talk about "Cain's sin" and how blacks weren't "ready" for the priesthood. I've even heard in some meetings that the holocaust was the Jews' punishment for rejecting Christ while American slavery was Cain's descendents punishment and Native American extinction/removal was their punishment for being lamanites.

The things said by that BYU professor being fired a few years ago weren't surprising to any familiar with utah county or BYU. He was merely repeating what had been said or insinuated during conference, sacrament meetings, and Sunday school countless times.

I'm not mudslinging I'm being serious here. Bundy's religious background sheds some light onto this. There's a lot of perverse thinking in rural Mormon places.

Trout, isn't your mom or grandma an ultra conservative weirdo who spews out racist vitriol? Where do you think she got that from?

Want to know what Bundy was 150 years ago? One of the MM massacre fellas. A backwards thinking hick who thought he was on some sort of altruistic mission against a foreign enemy.

Elder uchtdorf gave a talk last spring during conference about how past leaders have made mistakes. I think, in part, because of the closed-mindedness and rural nature of what was the home base of the LDS church. However, in just the past 50 years you've seen a surge in being an international church and expanding out of its rural and obscure borders.

The vast majority of Mormon Utah County business owners are complete assholes who have no problem abusing labor for their righteous benefit. I'll never understand this hypocrisy. It's the biggest stain on the religion IMO.

There are exceptions to the rule, however. My wife works for great group of Mormons business owners. They treat her better than any company I've interacted with.
 
I have these quickly. (Parcel ID's)

REID BUNKERVILLE L L C DST-901*#002-26-301-002

REID BUNKERVILLE L L C DST-800 #002-26-301-004

REID BUNKERVILLE L L C DST-800 #002-26-301-005

REID BUNKERVILLE L L C DST-800 #002-26-701-001

You believe a US Senator has enough pull to influence the actions of the BLM without stirring up a controversy big enough for his own party to throw him out? What you're suggesting would take so many complacent BLM workers that it's hard to believe a cover up would be even remotely possible. I guarantee you there are enough dedicated republican voting workers involved -- who are pining at the bit for a chance to be the one who took down Dirty Harry -- that a cover up of this magnitude is nigh* impossible.
 
You believe a US Senator has enough pull to influence the actions of the BLM without stirring up a controversy big enough for his own party to throw him out? What you're suggesting would take so many complacent BLM workers that it's hard to believe a cover up would be even remotely possible. I guarantee you there are enough dedicated republican voting workers involved -- who are pining at the bit for a chance to be the one who took down Dirty Harry -- that a cover up of this magnitude is nigh* impossible.

I have outlined it.

Word gets to law firm masquerading as environmentalist group. Said group sues the BLM to protect an endangered species, knowing the BLM can't respond in the allotted 90 day time requirement. Group was happy to be involved as they were awarded attorney fees by BLM for failure to comply. Environmentalists are happy.

BLM under pressure by group works to protect the habitat of the targeted species. Has to take recommendations such as removing cattle.

Rancher loses livelihood, there's now known claim to grazing rights (etc), making the land able to be sold to public via laws passed by REID.

It's not difficult to see 'how' it happens. And I have passed along documentation that proves that, at the least, an investigation should be underway.
 
I have outlined it.

Word gets to law firm masquerading as environmentalist group. Said group sues the BLM to protect an endangered species, knowing the BLM can't respond in the allotted 90 day time requirement. Group was happy to be involved as they were awarded attorney fees by BLM for failure to comply. Environmentalists are happy.

BLM under pressure by group works to protect the habitat of the targeted species. Has to take recommendations such as removing cattle.

Rancher loses livelihood, there's now known claim to grazing rights (etc), making the land able to be sold to public via laws passed by REID.

It's not difficult to see 'how' it happens. And I have passed along documentation that proves that, at the least, an investigation should be underway.

This conspiracy involves way too much time and investment for what little reward.
 
I read a little bit down past your diatribe against my "4000 or whatever" comment and failed to connect any of your 20 random dots. Can you retype this in a more concise, readable way to help me see what your point was?

Get back to me on this when you've quit drinking, for good.

What you do is line up the beer bottles, not connect dots.
 
Back
Top