NAOS
Well-Known Member
As long as people are saying they want him back I will continue to say I want conditions.
of course. There are conditions for everything. So, why don't you come up with some conditions that are based on reality?
As long as people are saying they want him back I will continue to say I want conditions.
Not sure I'd call it overrated. He produces numbers but isn't anywhere near top level material. He's a good backup forced into a starter's role. That's what the Jazz need, a backup. I don't think Millsap can be sold on that. I don't think Landry is the right fit for that, and Hickson could be sold on it, I think, if the price is right.
Why? Because they're ignorant drama queens. Millsap was relegated to 4th option once Mo came back and Gordo was inserted into the starting lineup, despite being a better facilitator and more efficient scorer than 2 of the 3 getting plays/touches ahead of him. Dude was **** on all year by Corbin and the local media, yet continued to do his job admirably. He was especially effective when playing with the Jazz's young players, which is probably the best reason to bring him back.yaaaaaawwwwwwnnnnn,
must we keep referring to him in this way?
This **** is overblown to all hell.
Eric Bledsoe and a junk piece from the Clips or Deandre Jordans contract.
Alec burks and 2 protected 1st for Eric Bledsoe.
You under-rate Millsap so hard it isn't even funny. He's substantially better than anybody on that list.
/discussion
Why? Because they're ignorant drama queens. Millsap was relegated to 4th option once Mo came back and Gordo was inserted into the starting lineup, despite being a better facilitator and more efficient scorer than 2 of the 3 getting plays/touches ahead of him. Dude was **** on all year by Corbin and the local media, yet continued to do his job admirably. He was especially effective when playing with the Jazz's young players, which is probably the best reason to bring him back.
You missed my point. Goodness gracious.
I would take any of those players over Millsap. Why? Because he isn't worth 12+ million dollars. I think someone will overpay to get Millsap. Look at the FA class. Al is the BEST OBTAINABLE FA out there. He will probably get Max or close to Max money. It's ridiculous.
So, yes, I'd take those players over Millsap, because Millsap will demand too much money and minutes to make it worth it.
Going along with your argument Al is a better player than Millsap, and Pau is better than Millsap as well. Why do you want Paul over Al, when Al is the better player?
No way we sign Al or Millsap. We just can't. It would be stupid beyond belief and a disaster of epic proportions. If Millsap's comments at the end of the season has taught them nothing, then the franchise is in bad shape. I have to believe that they aren't that stupid. No way could they be that stupid. They have two very promising young bigs that will be demanding some pretty big money real soon. You can't wrap up all your cap space in just your bigs. Especially not when Burks and Hayward will be demanding a lot more money real soon too, and especially not when you have gaping holes on your team, like the pg spot. You also cant be signing either one because of the chemistry problems it will create and also upset more of your players. It just bad idea for so many reasons. Also, what about Jeremy Evans? When the hell is he going to play? Jeremy Evans is a stud and its a crime that he doesn't play.