What's new
By:

Jazz select Grayson Allen at 21

Ok, there is one scenario where this makes sense to me.

We let Favors go and renounce Exum. Renounce all the other NG contracts other than O'Neal. Sign Paul George. Now, bringing in a combo guard senior locked into a cap friendly contract makes some sense. (to backup Rubio and Mitchell)

I have to think this line of thinking has at least done some to shape the decision to draft him.
 
jazzfan1971 said:
Ok, there is one scenario where this makes sense to me.

We let Favors go and renounce Exum. Renounce all the other NG contracts other than O'Neal. Sign Paul George. Now, bringing in a combo guard senior locked into a cap friendly contract makes some sense. (to backup Rubio and Mitchell)

I have to think this line of thinking has at least done some to shape the decision to draft him.
Click to expand...

Yeah but where is there a guarantee that we'll get Paul George?
 
stitches said:
I mean... if you have good enough foresight to predict 30-8 finish of the season... and then that we will pick a 23 year old undersized 2 guard with defensive issues and streaky shot... I liked this draft a lot. We just happened to draft a player I had ranked a full round later than where we got him.
Click to expand...
I see it more as an amalgam of:

1. We were an end of lottery team at best. That wasn’t acknowledged amidst the emotion of where we were at the time.

2. We believed every draft pick was Donovan or Rudy, and didn’t acknowledge the reality that they were extremes outliers.

3. We downplayed his play as being a hot streak.
 
NUMBERICA said:
Alright.

I did no research on the draft for two years and it was some of the best time not-wasted in that span of time.

I didn't like the Mitchell pick when I got the 3-minute synopsis. But I knew I didn't really know anything, so I quickly chilled.

I also hated the Lyles pick (and knee a lot more) and was dead-right about him. However, by some miracle ended up working out.

I hate this pick more than I hated the Lyles pick and I could go on forever about precisely why (Lyles at least fit a need, his "potential" was enough that even through a **** year carried value to the point he could still be traded for value).

I guess I'll just wave my white flag and my Jazz flag because I have no choice and be really bummed how much time I spent cramming the info that I did.

Here's to hoping for a hell of a sixth man for 7 years or something.

I really didn't and don't have time for this, so maybe this is the slap in the face that I needed. God damn the Grizzlies dangling that pick and the Kawhi drama.

Thanks for bearing with me, I really needed to vent. Go Jazz.
Click to expand...

I promise it’ll be ok.
 
this is lame. drafting Grayson Allen is like drafting tyler hansborogh... sure he'll give you 4 years of pretty medicore but fine I guess bench play. but at what cost? Just so I can be constructive without just complaining, Holiday was the BPA and i woulda taken him
 
infection said:
I see it more as an amalgam of:

1. We were an end of lottery team at best. That wasn’t acknowledged amidst the emotion of where we were at the time.

2. We believed every draft pick was Donovan or Rudy, and didn’t acknowledge the reality that they were extremes outliers.

3. We downplayed his play as being a hot streak.
Click to expand...
While those are to some degree true, it was also understanding how asset-poor this team is, and that hitting on those picks is the best chance to build something longterm.

And that's what's playing into my pant-******** tonight as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top