Interesting WaPo article today: https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...eeds-adjust-that-fact/?utm_term=.bba090f5dcbd
Any industry where patents are applied and protected, and there are a limited numbers of ways to accomplish a task. Pharmaceuticals, for example.
Hybrid vehicle technology isn't particularly impressive IMHO. And it is not in the running to be the new standard in how we power our vehicles going forward. If hybrid technology is an example of how aliens are boosting our technology I think we'll be fine on our own.
Good answer, and I agree. However, the difference here is that big pharm has hundreds, if not thousands of “staple” products, that cover a vast multitude of human/animal maladies. The chances of a single pill/vaccine/treatment coming out that would threaten their entire industry is essentially zilch.
I also agree with this, albeit taken in context. While hybrid tech isn’t anything to even raise an eyebrow at by today’s standards, it was pretty radical in 2000 when the first Prius came out. Imagine if it had come out thirty years earlier.
As for the tech as a whole, here’s one way to look at it, in a nut job sort of way (but hey, that’s what this thread is about, right?) Who’s to say that we’ve got 100% of “Hybrid tech” (whatever that may encompass) right now? Going off the assumption that it came from reverse engineering of some alien tech, and that the gov’t, or powers that be (just roll with it) have been, and will continue to, stagger the release or implementation of said tech, how do we really know if we’ve got the full picture.
Ya, the theory is waaaay out there, but is it that difficult to at least say it’s possible? If a bonafide cure for cancer was released tomorrow, how many Rx companies (the drug makers who supply the chemo, and the thousands of other cancer drugs) bite the dust by the end of the week? If the worlds dependence on oil dropped by 50% over a 6-12 month stretch, how do you think world markets would react? If solar energy replaced electric and gas utilities for 50% of the world over a 6-12 month period, what would happen to the global energy markets?
Hypothetical and silly theories abound, I know, but really, what if? We are in a society where essentially every person over the age of 18 has a smart phone with unbelievable capabilities, but we can’t figure out cancer? We can put the world and all of its knowledge, wireless internet that allows us to communicate instantly around the globe, and a lightning fast computer that dwarfs what NASA was using 20 years ago in the palm of our hands, yet we can’t seem to figure out clean energy? Fossil fuels? Still? Really?
Sometimes when I see smoke, there’s a fire. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and looks like a duck, then it’s probably not a goose, even if the mainstream media tells me it is.
I’m not saying that anything in this post is true, and honestly, I don’t believe it is, but I can certainly say it’s possible without much hesitation. It absolutely kills me when anyone says that something is IMPOSSIBLE, but it really grinds my gears when a scientist makes that claim. (Looking at you, Dolton)
Show me a scientist who is 100% certain that something is impossible and I’ll show you a guy who will likely be eating his words in 25-50 years.
I also agree with this, albeit taken in context. While hybrid tech isn’t anything to even raise an eyebrow at by today’s standards, it was pretty radical in 2000 when the first Prius came out. Imagine if it had come out thirty years earlier.
Interesting WaPo article today: https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...eeds-adjust-that-fact/?utm_term=.bba090f5dcbd
I’m not saying that anything in this post is true, and honestly, I don’t believe it is, but I can certainly say it’s possible without much hesitation. It absolutely kills me when anyone says that something is IMPOSSIBLE, but it really grinds my gears when a scientist makes that claim. (Looking at you, Dolton)
Show me a scientist who is 100% certain that something is impossible and I’ll show you a guy who will likely be eating his words in 25-50 years.
I'm not a physical scientist, but I'm 100% certain there's no Loch Ness monster, no Big Foot, no ghosts, no fairies, etc. I'm confident 25-50 years from now the same will be true.
This is a rather broad blanket statement.
I don't believe in bigfoot. However, the history of reports of a large, bi-pedal creature spotted all over the world for thousands of years makes me believe there is something people are seeing and phenomena. I'm certain it's bears in most cases and DNA tests have shown this time and time again.
No problem here. People ARE seeing things. (Although I'd be my retirement there are also Bigfoot cranks manufacturing evidence for a variety of reasons.) The human tendency throughout history when observing unexplained phenomena is to attach supernatural explanations to them. Just because some people see things they can't explain rationally, I'm loathe to accept their often supernatural, or otherwise extraordinary, explanations for them.
Another thing I've been going down the rabbit hole learning about is DMT. That stuff and trips seem fascinating. I don't think I'd ever try it, but it sounds like one hell of an experience.
That could be but if there is a way to travel faster than the speed of life than it would seem not merely possible but very likely that we have been visited. The hallmark of intelligence is curiosity and that curiosity would lead other beings to our planet if the technology permitted this.