What's new
By:

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

Joe Bagadonuts said:
You've got to be kidding me. It's believable for what reason?
Click to expand...

Cause its wholly consistent with his actions, character and the overall ineptitude of his administration. That's how he has denigrated the office and your government in the eyes of the world, this wasn't being reported by some **** can outfit like Fox News, it was the national broadcasters midday bulletin. Build a wall! And stick that orange dickhead behind it.
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
the claim that he suddenly remembered such a central meeting in this entire thing strikes me as incredibly odd.
Click to expand...

It strikes many of us as incredibly odd, and in fact rather unlikely.

Considering his original testimony was at odds with those that came later, what do you believe is more likely- that everyone else was lying and he decided to join them in that lie for some unknown reason, or that he was lying originally and realized he would be guilty of perjury if he didn't come clean?

Keep in mind this guy, unlike the others, is not a career diplomat. He's a guy that gave Trump a million dollars and in return got an ambassador position.
 
Hey guys. Long time no argue and belittle.

How are things going here? This **** has gotten exhausting and uninteresting. So Im caring quite less about any of this these days.

I did notice Trump tweeted about war with the mexican cartels. But my initial scanning of this forum doesnt show any outrage over it. Just wondering how you feel about it. Is it racist or what? I dont know. Im hoping one of you theys who are much smarter than the rest of us can educate.

Thanks. I will take your answer off the air.
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
My recollection was that Schiff et al were salivating over the things Sondland initially said. They considered him to be a very cooperative, supportive witness. Your claim is that he was somehow trying to protect the president in that earlier testimony and now he's become convinced to tell the truth? I admit that I am not hanging on every word of this process like some people around here seem to be, but the claim that he suddenly remembered such a central meeting in this entire thing strikes me as incredibly odd.
Click to expand...
To be fair no one said he suddenly remembered anything. They said he saw other folks testimony under oath that contradicted his testimony and so he decided to he better tell the truth or risk being convicted of purgery. At least that's how understood the posts I read.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
fishonjazz said:
To be fair no one said he suddenly remembered anything. They said he saw other folks testimony under oath that contradicted his testimony and so he decided to he better tell the truth or risk being convicted of purgery. At least that's how understood the posts I read.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...
Seems to me that you're relying on the opinions of those who want to massage the facts into appearing the way they want them to, rather than the actual facts. The truth is that Sondland said he now recalls an event that apparently slipped his mind when he testified before congress. If that is not suddenly remembering something, I don't know what is.
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
Seems to me that you're relying on the opinions of those who want to massage the facts into appearing the way they want them to, rather than the actual facts. The truth is that Sondland said he now recalls an event that apparently slipped his mind when he testified before congress. If that is not suddenly remembering something, I don't know what is.
Click to expand...
It's funny how other's testimonies are "opinions" but Sondland suddenly remembering something is a "fact".

You're trying really hard to polish a turd here, but I'm sorry to say all you've done is get **** all over your hands.
 
Harambe said:
As expected, @Red is not helping your story, @babe. Neither is the state of California. Or CNN. Or Heritage.org. Remarkably, I'm still willing to entertain the notion that 6 million fake votes were cast, or will be cast in the next election.

Unless we want to talk voter suppression? No?
Click to expand...

My previous effort of estimating possible voter fraud, in LA county alone, gave me the notion that 0.3M fraudulent votes were likely. I have looked at some of the counties around SF as well. My 6M estimate is nationwide.

I have some further information now, thanks to Judicial Watch, from CA only.

I heard on the regular news, Obama openly suggesting that "everyone" should vote, in a context of whether legal or not. This is consistent with ideological beliefs of Open Borders and world citizenship. I haven't heard them, however, suggesting we should send boatloads of folks to China to vote or whatnot. Or any complaint about the Chinese voting procedures.

Until I see you all get on that bus and start preaching voter suppression worldwide, and some sort of consistent voting system worldwide, I'm calling BS on all of you believers in selective concepts determined by local political advantages for your cause.

As I said above, I will be compiling some information about what practices and systematic frauds are going on. R or D.
 
The Thriller said:
Funny how criminals suddenly remember stuff better when others have corroborated to the crime that they lied about committing.
Click to expand...

Or is it he got leaned on to fix his story. At any rate, what we are getting is selective material compiled by a known partisan, and proven liar.And, sorry, even if true, he would, our foreign aid is all quid for national quo, hopefully. The Ukraine had been offering the US the information gratis. This is documented, but Liar Schiff and your lying Media won't publish that.

Trump was being nice, "encouraging" or "thanking" for what had already been delivered, as well as welcoming more documentation as it could be available. This is all within his Constitutional sworn oath of office, to enforce and uphold the laws of the US.

I've never seen so many smart people willing to be so enthusiastic about being so stupid.
 
fishonjazz said:
Cause have you seen or listened to Trump?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...
You think Trump is a dork, so therefore any dorky accusation that someone throws at Trump or a Trump associate is deemed as true by you. No evidence necessary.
Zombie said:
It's funny how other's testimonies are "opinions" but Sondland suddenly remembering something is a "fact".

You're trying really hard to polish a turd here, but I'm sorry to say all you've done is get **** all over your hands.
Click to expand...
I don't think you understood what I said. I wasn't calling the other testimonies "opinions." Fish relies on posts as his news source and said so (as he often does) in the post I responded to. I was calling the opinions of the posters he was referring to "opinions."

And exactly how do you think it downplayed Sondland's testomony to purport that the new thing he suddenly remembered is a "fact"? (Not that I said it was a fact. For some unknown reason you said that I said it was a fact.)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top