What's new

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

Seems to me that you're relying on the opinions of those who want to massage the facts into appearing the way they want them to, rather than the actual facts. The truth is that Sondland said he now recalls an event that apparently slipped his mind when he testified before congress. If that is not suddenly remembering something, I don't know what is.
You said "your claim" to Colton who never claimed any such thing. I simply posted that to be fair no one (jazzfanzers) ever claimed any such thing.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
You think Trump is a dork, so therefore any dorky accusation that someone throws at Trump or a Trump associate is deemed as true by you. No evidence necessary.

Oh you think I said it's true. Well that's where you are wrong.
I said that people might believe something like that COULD be true cause of the way Trump acts. You make your bed etc etc.

Like if someone said that Hayward was acting aloof with his teammates in Boston I wouldnt automatically call him guilty but I would definitely think there was a chance that there was some truth to the accusation.


Fwiw this was how Rubashov responded to you: Cause its wholly consistent with his actions, character and the overall ineptitude of his administration.

Weird that you don't think a person's actions and character might cause people to think there could be some truth to an accusation that is right in line with the accused's character and actions.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Last edited:
The truth is that Sondland said he now recalls an event that apparently slipped his mind when he testified before congress. If that is not suddenly remembering something, I don't know what is.

I think he was lying when he said he "now remembers"....



 
Last edited:
I'm not sure to what you are referring, but lately I have been in less of a mood to argue with people that will not change their minds based on evidence.

I gave you some information on LA County voters and a court order obtained by Judicial Watch requiring LA County to update their voter registration rolls and remove registrants who no longer live there.

A significant number of "jacked-up numbers" in registration, and an voter turnout bragged to be a record turnout, but 40% or so of the registered voters no longer living there. Well, who knows.... maybe those all all the displaced American citizens who now live in the LA River channel or on the sidewalks and parks in cardboard boxes, American workers displaced by illegal immigrants from China, Viet Nam, the Philippines, Mexico, Honduras, etc. etc who may also live in camps in the woods while working for wages not reported to the government in any way, or selling sex and drugs. Who the Hell can know all that. Probably a container ship worth of steel boxes unloaded every day full of Asians. Who knows how many who start out make it across the ocean in boxes that probably make the *****olds of slaveships looks and smell tolerable.

You don't give a **** about human beings, or facts. What the figures in LA indicate, which I posted in response to you, requires about a 120% actual citizen voter turnout in LA County current residents, 75% of whom must have voted Hillary. I figure that's about 0.3 M fake voters for the corrupt dems.

just quit with the bs on facts, or pay attention and respond.

Sonnie Johnson and some other blacks I've heard discuss Ferguson riots complain that most of the rioters there were white, non-resident. And several blacks who were the real qualified dissidents just turned up dead in the back seats of cars. Read a little Sonnie and tell me what you think.
 
Yet you can't provide any?

I tell you what. Let's just discuss baselines.

How do you determine what is/isn't a legitimate vote?

I intend to divert this topic to a separate thread. Be patient. Maybe next week. I won't forget.
 
I gave you some information on LA County voters and a court order obtained by Judicial Watch requiring LA County to update their voter registration rolls and remove registrants who no longer live there.

I'm not Harambe. However, since you dragged me into this, let's look at it.

A significant number of "jacked-up numbers" in registration, and an voter turnout bragged to be a record turnout, but 40% or so of the registered voters no longer living there.

32% of registrations (1.69 million out of 5.31) are being sent letters to verify if they are still living there. Assuming even as man as 90% are not responded to, that still under 30% that will be removed.

You don't give a **** about human beings, or facts. What the figures in LA indicate, which I posted in response to you, requires about a 120% actual citizen voter turnout in LA County current residents, 75% of whom must have voted Hillary. I figure that's about 0.3 M fake voters for the corrupt dems.

http://www.laalmanac.com/election/el02.php

LA County had 57% turnout in 2016, not 75%. Higher than 2012, lower than 2008, and not too different from national averages. Even if every single on of the 1.69 million registrations should no longer be valid, that still puts the LA county turn out at well below 100%

just quit with the bs on facts, or pay attention and respond.

Wish granted. You were wrong. No one is surprised.

Sonnie Johnson and some other blacks I've heard discuss Ferguson riots complain that most of the rioters there were white, non-resident.

Many were not residents of Ferguson, and some not even residents of St. Louis County/City. From the pictures I saw, well over 80% were black.

And several blacks who were the real qualified dissidents just turned up dead in the back seats of cars. Read a little Sonnie and tell me what you think.

https://www.breitbart.com/blog/2014/08/11/Riots-in-Missouri/

Black America’s favorite past time is back on full display in Ferguson, MO, as looting and rioting breaks out after the fatal shooting death of an unarmed 18-year old by Ferguson law enforcement.

I think she's either a a racist, ignorant blowhard, or is deliberating getting some wingnut welfare, just based on that one sentence. Reading further, and a couple of other articles, didn't do much to change that opinion.

However, I have gone over the publicly available information in California, where there was a boast from the State officials about an amazing voter turnout notably in LA and SF something like 75% of registered voters.....

57% in LA, 80% in SF (since SF is much wealthier than LA, this is not a surprise, and again lower than it was in 2008).

and I have gone over the case filed by Judicial Watch, ... there was about a 120% voter turnout in LA county.

Perhaps next time you could go over the case with a person who knows how to add and subtract.

I wouldn't be too sure Rs don't or wouldn't do stuff like that either.

I agree both sides engage in vote tally corruption.
 
Cancel culture run amok.
Ugh so tired of leftist liberals stopping free speech at colleges.

Way to selectively cherry pick one instance where it's not happening. Why dont you two take a break from fantasy and join the real world where censorship is happening all over. Just because you found one time where it's not doesnt mean you just made a point. No one has ever said its everywhere all the time. It can be happening 60% of the time and still be a huge deal.

Also, its Alabama. Cmon. Really? That's your big proof? Why don't you post another instance just like this one from a school in California?

Screeeeech . RUSSIA!!
 
Back
Top