What's new
By:
Filters

2020 Presidential election

infection said:
Which part? The part where he said Tulsi is dropping out and endorsing Biden or the part that was clearly tongue-in-cheek? Also, when you say “you guys,” who is “you”?
Click to expand...

The conspiracies Glenn comes up with and what you’re seemingly spewing. Or did you have some other point?
 
Remember that time some dude here created a thread because Hillary Clinton said Tulsi was a Russian agent? Lolol a poll question is cultish but absolutely idiotic Russia conspiracies are #geteducated.
 
The Thriller said:
The conspiracies Glenn comes up with and what you’re seemingly spewing. Or did you have some other point?
Click to expand...
So saying Tulsi is a Russian asset out to spoil the election for Putin with a third party run is totally reasonable, but suggesting that she’s serving Putin by promoting Biden is spewing conspiracy? Okay. Glenn clearly isn’t serious about Putin using Gabbard to promote Biden, but I’m surprised you thought he was. He was pointing out how asinine the original claim was that Tulsi was an asset helping Trump and Putin by carrying that logic forward.
 
JazzyFresh said:
Trump really **** the bed on the initial phases of this Corona stuff but even now Democrats and doctors are praising him. Well besides the radical-left people who think the word China is racist. That's 100% proof that Trump is doing good work when calling someone racist for saying China is all CNN has.
Click to expand...
Ok. Keep going dude.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
infection said:
So saying Tulsi is a Russian asset out to spoil the election for Putin with a third party run is totally reasonable, but suggesting that she’s serving Putin by promoting Biden is spewing conspiracy? Okay. Glenn clearly isn’t serious about Putin using Gabbard to promote Biden, but I’m surprised you thought he was. He was pointing out how asinine the original claim was that Tulsi was an asset helping Trump and Putin by carrying that logic forward.
Click to expand...

Not asinine at all to think that Tulsi could run as a third party spoiler to wreck chaos in our election. Perhaps if she had been polling better she would’ve.

Tulsi can and will still play a role in wrecking chaos and discrediting the Democratic Party. How many appearances did she have on Fox News this month alone?

Tulsi absolutely serves Russian purposes. Whether she’s in it because she’s a traitor, bought off, or just a self-promoting blowhard.
 
The Thriller said:
Not asinine at all to think that Tulsi could run as a third party spoiler to wreck chaos in our election. Perhaps if she had been polling better she would’ve.

Tulsi can and will still play a role in wrecking chaos and discrediting the Democratic Party. How many appearances did she have on Fox News this month alone?

Tulsi absolutely serves Russian purposes. Whether she’s in it because she’s a traitor, bought off, or just a self-promoting blowhard.
Click to expand...
But it’s insane to think she’s serving Putin by endorsing Biden? That’s just conspiracy nonsense?
 
infection said:
But it’s insane to think she’s serving Putin by endorsing Biden? That’s just conspiracy nonsense?
Click to expand...

yes. That’s nonsense.

Why? Because Biden isn’t a coward and moron, unlike trump.

unless you think Biden and the Democrats are equivalent to trump and the republicans...
 
The Thriller said:
yes. That’s nonsense.

Why? Because Biden isn’t a coward and moron, unlike trump.

unless you think Biden and the Democrats are equivalent to trump and the republicans...
Click to expand...
I think you should take the way you feel about how fantastically ridiculous that assertion is, and perhaps use it as a window to see how ridiculous the Russian asset narrative is. It’s kind of like walking around all day with your butthole showing, then seeing another person walking around with their butthole showing and thinking, “OMG that guy looks like an idiot.” But it doesn’t matter if it doesn’t cause a modicum of self-reflection.
 
infection said:
I think you should take the way you feel about how fantastically ridiculous that assertion is, and perhaps use it as a window to see how ridiculous the Russian asset narrative is. It’s kind of like walking around all day with your butthole showing, then seeing another person walking around with their butthole showing and thinking, “OMG that guy looks like an idiot.” But it doesn’t matter if it doesn’t cause a modicum of self-reflection.
Click to expand...

lol okay.

it’s pretty funny when people (from the right) who write the same tired schtick day after day complain about my lack of self-reflection. Sigh some Things just never change.
 
The Thriller said:
lol okay.

it’s pretty funny when people (from the right) who write the same tired schtick accuse me of my lack of self-reflection. Sigh some Things just never change.
Click to expand...
To be honest, I‘m not certain you have any familiarity with what I write.
 
The Thriller said:
What we're arguing about are two different things. You're arguing whether parties can change or evolve. I'm arguing that no more than two parties can exist in our political system because of the way our Constitution was written.

'm saying is that our Constitution actually prevents more than two political parties from existing. What you seem to argue is that political parties can't evolve or that new political parties can't form. They have and will. Federalists, Your Whig argument actually supports mine, you just didn't recognize it. The Whig party was swallowed up by the Republican party. But our country's history shows that no more than two political parties can exist for a sustained amount of time because of the structure set forth by our Constitution.

Or do you think having more than just 2 parties is just a mental block that we need to "get over?" How do you suppose we "get over" this mental block seeing how we're over 200 years into this thing and never has there been a sustained 3rd party success?
Click to expand...
What part(s) of the constitution do you think bring that about?
 
I agree he's really stepped up his game. Still tons of work to do but if he can fix what Obama did to this country I'm confident he can fix this.

"In the new poll, 55% of Americans approve of the president’s management of the crisis, compared to 43% who disapprove,” ABC News reported. “Trump’s approval on this issue is up from last week, when the numbers were nearly reversed. Only 43% approved of Trump’s handling of the pandemic and 54% disapproved in last week’s poll.”
 
Yell racism then when asked to explain just get angry. A definite go-to move. I now understand where a certain demographic was programmed like robots to do this. This is the face of Democratic party. Claim something, provide no evidence, get Thriller in a hissy fit, then rinse and repeat. Just like crying that the color black absorbs colors and gets hot(common sense) and that seasons and weather effect viruses. Lol posters here literally said these things are false.

 
Last edited:
The notion that trump will fix this is funny. The American people will fix this despite his incompetence and lack of leadership.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top