So I found some data reported on the actual testing and incidence of CoViD-19 in a lot of countries...
https://ourworldindata.org/covid-testing
I have heard that South Korea, using methods similar to China's, ran out the testing as first priority, literally going house to house with the test materials, with a strategy to emphasis detecting the virus in the total population, rather than waiting until people turn up, worried or sick, asking for tests. In South Korea, 95% of the tests showed negative, and apparently they found most of the carriers already because they focus first on neighborhoods or social groups were cases were showing up. And they did it quick, before very many people got it.
So far, in the US, about 85% of the tests are showing negative..... showing also that we are deeper into the course than South Korea was. When the disease is fully expended, we'll have healthy survivors who will show antibodies present via ELISA tests, but no virus present per the PCR test.
Most of our tests being done are PCR tests. I think South Korea and China used ELISA tests for the antigen. The best way to detect people who need care and quarantine. Rather than do mass public health crude methods like we are using, we should by now have done the ELISA antigen test on every American. You can, if you have the test strips, literally test kids or workers entering a school of workplace.
Absolutely inexcusable we are not already doing this.
But still, the stat here is encouraging. With only 80% or so showing positive on a direct viral test at this stage, after almost two weeks of shutdown, it is hard to argue that 60% will get it before the transmission rate goes to zero. That would be 200M, maybe 3M deaths we don't start using our known effective medicines and get some vaccines out.
All bets are off for NYC though. Even if they did vote for their government, they didn't deserve to be subjected to all that stupidity.