Click where he says, "Here's the media bias chart".So you have a possible methodology but no actual list of such media. So the suggestion is useless. Gotcha.
Click where he says, "Here's the media bias chart".So you have a possible methodology but no actual list of such media. So the suggestion is useless. Gotcha.
So he loses points for not exploring on his own.Click where he says, "Here's the media bias chart".
Mom just got out of the hospital today, will be on oxygen for the next few weeks. She also got pneumonia but is recovering nicely.
While it's not in list format, the very post you responded to had a link to the chart.Do you have a list of those sources? And who determines where they fall on the scale? I'd like to see that list. Only one I can think of that comes close is npr.
Where exactly, in the methodology article? Stupid to say there is something to see and not post an actual link.Click where he says, "Here's the media bias chart".
Not visible on mobile I guess. I only got to the methodology article because I guessed the word at the end of the sentence might be a link. Is there a link that can actually be tapped to go somewhere? I'm not tapping on every word in a post to find a hidden link.While it's not in list format, the very post you responded to had a link to the chart.
@Jason @coltonYou know we have to judge @Joe Bagadonuts on a curve.
I'll issue a challenge to him. Here's the media bias chart
The challenge is: Only read NON-OPINION articles from sites with a score higher than 36.5 reliability scale(top to bottom), and between -5.5 and 5.5 on the balance scale(left to right) for one month. Refrain from conjecture and watercooler/sacrament/family riff raff bullshitting during this time.
Me? I already have. I've even taken a step back from conjecture and bullshitting. Probably explains my absenteism from this site.
Accepted/Decline?
**** you **** wad. Try just pasting the URL, then it gives a short synopsis and a link that is fully visible in all formats.So he loses points for not exploring on his own.
At least he showed interest. That's a win. Can't be too hard on my man for that.
For anyone else on mobile who can't see links added to words, here's the chart.You know we have to judge @Joe Bagadonuts on a curve.
I'll issue a challenge to him. Here's the media bias chart
The challenge is: Only read NON-OPINION articles from sites with a score higher than 36.5 reliability scale(top to bottom), and between -5.5 and 5.5 on the balance scale(left to right) for one month. Refrain from conjecture and watercooler/sacrament/family riff raff bullshitting during this time.
Me? I already have. I've even taken a step back from conjecture and bullshitting. Probably explains my absenteism from this site.
Accepted/Decline?
It shows up just fine in the app on my Android. It's very basic HTML, so I can't imagine what could be wrong with your phone.

Dude.. I was trying not to be a dick. That doesn't happen often, but it sure as hell shouldn't look like this.**** you **** wad. Try just pasting the URL, then it gives a short synopsis and a link that is fully visible in all formats.
Or just go **** yourself.
Where he says, "But the methodology can be read here", click on the word "here".Where exactly, in the methodology article? Stupid to say there is something to see and not post an actual link.