What's new

WWIII, The Mother of all Oil Wars, Shaping Up

So, this thread was started almost a year before Putin's "Special operation" to counter US-led (Arguably Trump-supported) and Western oligarchic-inspired NAZI agitation in Ukraine provocations using NATO and EU proxies to push hard against Putin's complaints across the years against violations of US diplomatic agreements that NATO would not expand eastward "one inch" following the breakup of the USSR. The Western support for Ukranian military action against Russian ethnic separatists following the 2014 coup and subsequent increase in Ukranian ethnic measures against Russian-speaking or pro-Russian political people inside Ukraine. During the separatist civil war, some millions of people fled all the way to Russia, with stories of horrendous mistreatment. Leaders jailed, voter suppression, ethnic cleansing.

There was a settlement called the Minsk Accords which was supposed to resolve things peaceably and end the fighting in the donbas. Zelensky, who was a puppet set up by a TV mogul, a pro-Western oligarch in Ukraine, repudiated that agreement, and then began preparing for intensifying the suppression of the separatists, massing heavy artillery near the dug-in lines in the Donbas.

In the West, our media calls Putin's invasion "aggression" unprovoked. People in the West who knew the facts and researched the diplomacy train wrote books about how we were crossing a clearly stated "red line" that Russia, not just Putin, considered to be an existential threat against Russia.

Today, in the news, there are brags about over 5 attempts by Ukrainians to assassinate Putin, before the invasion was begun. In Foreign Affairs, the CFR rag, there have been many articles about how to overthrow Putin in the recent months, and there have been further attempts to assassinate him. Western-linked "traitors" inside Putin's military and diplomatic corps have been exposed, some even publicly resigning from posts in the West.

Meanwhile, there is a considerable pro-Russian "political left" and nominal multipolar political aspiration around the world that is just critical of the US for this proxy war with Russia. The President of South Africa, and both leading contenders in the upcoming election in Brazil, are saying this war is the fault of the US. Massive numbers of people around the world, not to mention China, call this a proxy war started by the US.

Only in "the West", that is the Eu/NATO, US/UK countires is this being sold and accepted by the public as purely Putin aggression.

The real context is cartel power positioning. BRICS is apparently a real thing. That is a growing economic grouping of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. With satellite aspirants, other countries, in Africa, Asia, and South America.

Oil may not be the only resource at stake. Russia is the world leader in nuclear energy resources, having been active for years promoting this and building plants around the world for many countries. Russia is the leader in other resources as well.

Now we have Biden bearding the Chinese Tiger saying we will fight for Taiwan.

I just don't know how to tell anyone how stupid they are. Taiwan has never been a part of any Chinese Empire. It was settled by Malay peoples related to the Filipinos over a thousand years ago. It was occuppied by Japan in WWII. Chiang Kai Shek fled there with his Chinese supporters, displacing the aborigines. China has no valid terrirtorial claim in Taiwan, or more properly, in Formosa.. Our media just won't state the fact. Nobody will.

Russia, on the other hand, did hold Crimea and the Donbas as part of its sovereign territory prior to the Russian Revolution, the Communist 1917 revolution, along with the rest of Ukraine. The Ottoman Empire and the British fought wars there trying to push back the Moscow Russians and gain control all through the 1800s and even before. Catharine the Great set up Russian outposts, build cities across the region, including Odessa. It was Khruschev in 1954 that changed the boder between the provinces of Ukraine and Russia, for internal political purposes.

The difference in ethnicity is not all that great between a Ukrainian and a Russian. Both areas were subject to settlements by Vikings along the rivers, and incursions of peoples from the neighboring countries like Turkey (Ottoman). People from India came there for opportunity, who were called gypsys because of their manner of living out of wagons and outside of settlements. In India, they had been the "untouchables". Several huge invasions from the east affected the population as well. The oriental folks of hengisw Khan and Attila the Hun are examples. People from the Mediterranean (Romanians) and Greece moved there as well, but the originals were probably just people moving up from the middle east looking for a place to be. They formed a mix known as Slavs.

People not given to being part of anyone's Empire. People just proud to be themselves.

Ukraine will never just be a part of Russia, or Romania, either. Neither will the Poles ever be part of Germany, or Russia.

But the culture coming fromthe Catholic or Orthodox past is so authoritarian, and the influence of the Reformation so insufficient, they are not going to think of forming local governments controlled by the local people either. Authoritarians like the Czars or the Ottomans are what they know.

We had a chance when Putin asked the West to just include Russia in NATO or the EU, but we missed that. He was not going to just let our oligarchs monopolize Russia. That was the problem then. It will be the problem after Putin is gone.

I have said Putin would never be able to re-assemble the USSR. I say now we will never run Russia.

Russia will perhaps be the odd-man out for our lifetimes. We will have bigger problems all over the rest of the damn world. We will not be a unipolar UN world order. We will not win the globalism race for a Western-led UN with global governance. We are just too stupid to do all that.
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: MVP
Time to update this thread. I guess it's "Day 101".

Overall, it looks like the Taliban in Afghanistan has a persistent, capable challenger. An outfit that got a lot of the military crap we left behind, like ISIS got some stuff left behind in various places by Obama. Their purpose? Western-instigated local terrorism and atacks on the general BRICS development of infrastructudre through central Asia, linking Russia, China, and India and extension of markets.

The War in Ukraine may have a similar purpose, to limit development of transportation through Central Asia into Eastern Europe. This kind of strategy has been standard British Foreign Office policy for centuries now. Gotta float merchandise on the seas.

I discussed elsewhere George Soros' speech at Davos.

I have pointed out the beginnings of the Iraq war. First, Saddam Hussein was a vital ally against Iran, and the Bushies loved him. But he went bad, and the Bushies hated him. He was not a loyal Western puppet. Madeline Albright, a cousin of the rockefeller clan if not part of its heart, dropped a hint to Saddam that we would wink and smile if he took Bahrain. Biden said as much to Putin if he took "a little slice of Ukraine". The war in Ukraine stinks, but it looks more and more like this is an all-out Putin takedown. We decided we didn't like Putin when he fussed about Western loyalties of foreigners wanting to do business in Russia. Russia has enough o8il to undermine the climate social justice bandwagon, and he is not a true believer. He keeps saying stuff like our Western leadership in the UN is a band of thugs who never keep any treaty or promise. That is, of course, the simple truth. So Putin has be rubbed out. The contract is out to eliminate Putin, and secure all that oil so we can keep prices high.

This war is good for Rockwell and other US arms manufacturers, but it's glory daze for our oil companies.

WWIII boys. Guts and Glory.

Ukrainian guts, our glory and lortsa money for our Bigs.
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: MVP
So, I've been thinking.

What would I do if I were the King of England. With the mentality of a mass shooter who wanted to get noticed in the Press.

I know I'm not supposed to actually go out and meet people in the pub around the corner from Parliament, or one of the really swank joints in The Square Mile (as they say, that special political district that makes all its own rules, "the City of London"). I have no contact with the real world beyond the daily little box prepared for me from the British Foreign Office. And even though The Devil does come calling in the lonesome dead hours after midnight, I am left alone to faintly smile at various heavily-screened and selected callers during the day.

How on earth could I possibly get a gun, or an army, and go shoot up some innocent little country?

Life as King is soooo damn boring.

probably the closest thing to a really exciting and newsworthy mass shooting would be to put a little note in the return box for the British Foreign Office.

Something like, "Let's find some Nazis somewhere, and send them to Ukraine. And how about that fellow who owns the TV station with that moron actor who really wows the people with his show. Let's really make him the Pres of Ukraine, and slip a few extra bucks to that TV shop owner for the "Special Media Operation".

I bet we can really yank on Putin's chain with this one.
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: MVP
So, I've been thinking.

What would I do if I were the King of England. With the mentality of a mass shooter who wanted to get noticed in the Press.

I know I'm not supposed to actually go out and meet people in the pub around the corner from Parliament, or one of the really swank joints in The Square Mile (as they say, that special political district that makes all its own rules, "the City of London"). I have no contact with the real world beyond the daily little box prepared for me from the British Foreign Office. And even though The Devil does come calling in the lonesome dead hours after midnight, I am left alone to faintly smile at various heavily-screened and selected callers during the day.

How on earth could I possibly get a gun, or an army, and go shoot up some innocent little country?

Life as King is soooo damn boring.

probably the closest thing to a really exciting and newsworthy mass shooting would be to put a little note in the return box for the British Foreign Office.

Something like, "Let's find some Nazis somewhere, and send them to Ukraine. And how about that fellow who owns the TV station with that moron actor who really wows the people with his show. Let's really make him the Pres of Ukraine, and slip a few extra bucks to that TV shop owner for the "Special Media Operation".

I bet we can really yank on Putin's chain with this one.
I know, right? A country would never elect an actor or some two-bit television celebrity to be their President.

c36097-6.jpg
donald-trump-history-hair-ss04.jpg
 
Top