That's very naive. Many would claim their denial is a cover-up, or that the guy was killed, or all kinds of things. Nothing Pfizer could say would make this go away.This all goes away if they just come out and say this is fake.
That's very naive. Many would claim their denial is a cover-up, or that the guy was killed, or all kinds of things. Nothing Pfizer could say would make this go away.This all goes away if they just come out and say this is fake.
Why do you hate capitalism?Pfizer Accused of 'Obscene' COVID Profits After Posting Record Revenues
Uhh they could disapprove the entire thing by saying this. You really don't understand this? If the guy didn't work for pfizer this all goes away. I mean, duh...That's very naive. Many would claim their denial is a cover-up, or that the guy was killed, or all kinds of things. Nothing Pfizer could say would make this go away.
I don't but I think it's pretty shady that Pfizer made billions off of others suffering. In most sane worlds that would be frowned upon but you guys have to go to any lengths to protect Pfizer so you do not get exposed.Why do you hate capitalism?
Are you saying the video is fake?Serious question: Has Project Veritas (that name has echoes of the Russian newspaper Pravda, or even Izvestia, nyet?) EVER done ANYTHING that wasn't at best disingenuous and misleading editing, or even completely faked?
Nothing Pfizer says would dissuade you from posting conspiracies against vaccines.Uhh they could disapprove the entire thing by saying this. You really don't understand this? If the guy didn't work for pfizer this all goes away. I mean, duh...
No. The answer is no. Every major “break” they’ve made has been a nothingburger. They edit videos for maximum damage politically. From ACORN, to PP, to Pfizer. It doesn’t stop conservative media from spinning these stories. And that’s their business model; serve red meat for the rube Fox News base. PV gets attention and profit and FN gets angry/paranoid people to stay hooked.Serious question: Has Project Veritas (that name has echoes of the Russian newspaper Pravda, or even Izvestia, nyet?) EVER done ANYTHING that wasn't at best disingenuous and misleading editing, or even completely faked?
Says the Qanoner promoting a conspiracy. What is it exactly CGI? Is the guy not really there? Is he a fake? Explain it. Because if any of these are true, pfizer would say so.Nothing Pfizer says would dissuade you from posting conspiracies against vaccines.
What? I don’t believe in Qanon.Says the Qanoner promoting a conspiracy. What is it exactly CGI? Is the guy not really there? Is he a fake? Explain it. Because if any of these are true, pfizer would say so.
Of course you won't answer a simple question and explain how it's fake or provide a single shred of evidence that actual video evidene is somehow fake. That's asking A LOT for someone to back up their unsubstantiated claim. You won't answer because you fabricated it to protect yourself. You are Qanon.What? I don’t believe in Qanon.
At least make insults that make sense.
LOL you can make stupid made up claims that PV just completely fabricated this story but not one of you have provided anything to back up your Qanon lie. I find it quite cowardly that someone can literally create a conspiracy out of thin air then run away when asked for more info.
That's what I thought, but I thought there was a chance I might have missed something.No. The answer is no. Every major “break” they’ve made has been a nothingburger. They edit videos for maximum damage politically. From ACORN, to PP, to Pfizer. It doesn’t stop conservative media from spinning these stories. And that’s their business model; serve red meat for the rube Fox News base. PV gets attention and profit and FN gets angry/paranoid people to stay hooked.
Just like with this, nothing Pfizer says or does will stop those already predisposed to doubting the Covid vaccine/believe Covid was invented/is being exploited from continuing to believe that way.
It sounds like there are significant questions about the interviewee, to wit, the person they say he is doesn't seem to exist. Additionally, due to editing tricks, he could easily have said something entirely different from what they show out of context. A possible example of that was given above (not by me), so I'm not going to bother going over a precise hypothetical again.Are you saying the video is fake?
Might need to take a break bro.Of course you won't answer a simple question and explain how it's fake or provide a single shred of evidence that actual video evidene is somehow fake. That's asking A LOT for someone to back up their unsubstantiated claim. You won't answer because you fabricated it to protect yourself. You are Qanon.
Do you not agree that it would completely disprove of this if they just came out and said he doesn't work there? It would literally put this to rest if they came out and debunked it.It sounds like there are significant questions about the interviewee, to wit, the person they say he is doesn't seem to exist. Additionally, due to editing tricks, he could easily have said something entirely different from what they show out of context. A possible example of that was given above (not by me), so I'm not going to bother going over a precise hypothetical again.
To be clear, I'm not saying it is a deepfake, although that type of thing is getting to be more and more possible all the time. But if it were, why would they deepfake a nobody? Why not the CEO?